Interview
Why do you write poetry?
 Petals, aardvarks, goulash –
 there is no end to it.
I’m sorry . . . ?
 I, too, am sorry.
 I am sorry for Petula Misericordia,
 her unrequited love for Dan Splendid,
 the mishap with the steam traction engine,
 for the question that comes next.
Obviously poetry is a passion to you?
 By no means. What is it, after all –
 a collection of bombazine dildos,
 lemon-flavoured aertex shirts,
 letters to the editor
 and prunes . . .
You don’t like it then . . . ?
I impugn your question.
You what?
 I impugn it
 with a toasting fork.
 You are a dead broadcaster.
 I am the Cimarron Kid.
You’re not taking this seriously.
 I am always taking it seriously
 out to the wheelie bin
 and dropping in
 the white lady in the grey underhose
 who as we speak is speeding southwards
 in a sealed railway compartment.
Perhaps that is poetry?
No, it’s love.
Can you recall why you began to write?
 I was locked in a toilet
 with a jackdaw and a notebook
 and my mother was pounding
 on the door.
Was it difficult to get pub– ?
 I slept with the editor.
 He was a very old man with a grey beard.
 I suffered his snores
 for an entire weekend in London.
Oh.
What do you mean ‘oh’?
Can you tell us who has influenced you?
 My own mistakes have influenced me,
 and the monsters on the way.
I see. Er . . . how did you feel
about the poetry reading tonight?
 I saw myself translated
 into a pool of slowly spreading marmalade
 that smelt
 of dahlias and hornpipes.
 It was pouring hacksaws and drainpipes
 and frankly,
 I was lucky to get out of there
 alive . . .
How do you see the future of poetry?
 I see us lost in the great library
 at Salivaville, making
 little copies of ourselves there
 and staring at the sea.
The sea . . . ?
 High up on the cliffs,
 we shall watch the approaching squadrons –
 their black sails, polished, empty decks –
 and wait for words to come to us
 without regret.
Ernest Snaffleburger, thank you.
Thank you.
Something to Read
 Today, a poem
 by a member of
 the American Academy of Letters –
 a man who entitles
 his poem ‘Happiness’.
 In the poem:
 some Asian philosophy –
 the flow – you know
 something about
 ‘the intentions of the day’.
 But how can a day ‘intend’?
 The lines of this intentional poem
 have all been justified rightwards –
 and at the end,
 some happy thoughts occur to our laureate
 about great poets:
 Basho, Walt Whitman, Ernest
 Snaffleburger, Czeslaw Milos, Rilke.
 Those are his heroes
 (except for Snaffleburger,
 I just put that in
 to see if you read this far).
 Now, Ernest
 had none of Basho’s brevity,
 none of Whitman’s barbaric yawp.
 Ernest laughed a lot
 but I’m not sure that he was happy.
 He had several wives
 and he kissed them all in different beds.
 Ask him about it all,
 he’d write you a poem called ‘Tears’
 and chuckle as he scribbled
 a lyric impossibly sad.
Send Letters To:
                The Editor 
                London Review of Books, 
                28 Little Russell Street 
                London, WC1A 2HN
letters@lrb.co.uk
                Please include name, address, and a telephone number.
            

