In the latest issue:

In Quarantine

Erin Maglaque

Après Brexit

Ferdinand Mount

Short Cuts: Springtime for Donald

David Bromwich

Meetings with their Gods

Claire Hall

‘Generation Left’

William Davies

At the North Miami Museum: Alice Paalen Rahon

Mary Ann Caws

Buchan’s Banter

Christopher Tayler

‘American Dirt’

Christian Lorentzen

Fiction and the Age of Lies

Colin Burrow

In Lahore

Tariq Ali


James Lasdun

Rereading Bowen

Tessa Hadley

At the Corner House

Rosemary Hill

William Gibson

Thomas Jones

Poem: ‘Murph & Me’

August Kleinzahler

The Stud File

Kevin Brazil

John Boorman’s Quiet Ending

David Thomson

In Shanghai: The West Bund Museum

John-Paul Stonard

Diary: The Deborah Orr I Knew

Jenny Turner

The Pretend and the FakeMark Rudman
Vol. 21 No. 5 · 4 March 1999

The Pretend and the Fake

Mark Rudman

378 words

Sam uses the words ‘pretend’ and ‘fake’ to
distinguish representations from real
things. Since all movie ratings are specious,
conflating the slangy use of curse words,
sickening violence, and kinky sex, I
risked taking him to whatever films I thought
would stimulate his imagination.
When I asked if he was scared, he’d answer
in a bold and firm voice: ‘No, dad, it was just
pretend.’ He found the distinction between
the representation and the real, absolute.

If anything in a film looks fake he’ll let me know.
This usually opens the door to a dialogue on
what is objectively real and fake,
like locations as opposed to sets; or
scenes where an actor
appears to motorcycle through a town
as a bomb goes off and remain
fractionally ahead of the explosion
as smoke and flames fill the screen,

when the images were shot separately –
and the actor is riding in an empty room
where blocks hold the wheels in place and fans
blow his hair and the town is a model.
Invention hasn’t kept pace
with special effects.

Since Sam’s obsession with the real and the fake
runs curiously parallel to my own, and
since it’s his responsibility to comment
each time he spots sleight-of-hand, cinematic
or otherwise, I asked if we couldn’t
agree that all representations – all
art – and in this case screen images,
are equally fake, imaginary, pretend.

The beauty of Where Eagles Dare,
and Mary Ure’s role in it, beginning when,
a spy among spies, she’s smuggled in
with the baggage in the belly of the plane,
is that it doesn’t straddle the fence
of believability. Cast as the lone
female among rugged men
whose mission is to raid the German
stronghold in the frozen heights,
Mary bewitches the enemy in quieter ways;
extracts information with a glance.
And why break down the lovely moment
when she and her partner, Richard
Burton, reunite in an appointed barn,
which emanates warmth,
and Mary leans back against the haystacks
to welcome her lover’s embrace.

So much had happened in
less than a decade,
who knows they hadn’t forgotten
how much they’d liked
playing opposite each other
in the film version
of Look Back in Anger.

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Read More

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.

Newsletter Preferences