In the latest issue:

Real Men Go to Tehran

Adam Shatz

What Trump doesn’t know about Iran

Patrick Cockburn

Kaiser Karl V

Thomas Penn

The Hostile Environment

Catherine Hall

Social Mobilities

Adam Swift

Short Cuts: So much for England

Tariq Ali

What the jihadis left behind

Nelly Lahoud

Ray Strachey

Francesca Wade

C.J. Sansom

Malcolm Gaskill

At the British Museum: ‘Troy: Myth and Reality’

James Davidson

Poem: ‘The Lion Tree’

Jamie McKendrick

SurrogacyTM

Jenny Turner

Boys in Motion

Nicholas Penny

Jia Tolentino

Lauren Oyler

Diary: What really happened in Yancheng?

Long Ling

Short Cuts: Harry Goes Rogue

Jonathan Parry

Rotten as TouchwoodLoraine Fletcher
Close

Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website (www.lrb.co.uk — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.


  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.
Close
The Poems of Charlotte Smith 
edited by Stuart Curran.
Oxford, 335 pp., £35.50, March 1994, 9780195078732
Show More
Show More

Charlotte Smith was the first English novelist to make a castle or great house into an emblem of the state. Before her, houses in novels provided appropriate settings or confined rebellious heroines: Smith introduced the house as a microcosm of the condition of England and a site for the subtlest display of an author’s political loyalties.

In Reflections on the Revolution in France, published in November 1790, Burke likens the Ancien Regime to an old building badly in need of repair, whose inhabitants, however, still ‘possessed in some parts the walls, and in all the foundations, of a noble and venerable castle. You might have repaired those walls, you might have built on those old foundations.’ He uses the house metaphor throughout Reflections, warning the English against ‘pulling down an edifice that has answered to any tolerable degree for ages the common purposes of society’ and recommending that the parts be firmly secured so they cannot warp and ‘start from their allotted places’. The architecture of the state and, especially in cartoons, the state as architectural folly became familiar images in the decade that followed the French Revolution and remained common well into the next century.

Sceptical and pro-Revolutionary, Smith saw satirical possibilities in Burke’s architectural metaphor, and in her novel Desmond, two emblematic buildings represent the old regime and its replacement. Parodying Burke’s lament over the imprisonment of Marie Antoinette, the hero predicts that ‘a hundred pens will leap from their inkwells’ to refute Burke. Desmond is one of the very few contemporary novels to deal directly with the Revolution; even the English Jacobin writers were waiting to see how the cat would jump before committing themselves.

Smith expands Burke’s metaphor in The Old Manor House, a grimly witty account of England under authoritarian rule. Rayland Hall needs to be completely rebuilt and to have a better owner than the tyrannical aristocrat, Grace Rayland. Her housekeeper reflects that the building is ‘as rotten as touchwood, and the rats are forever coming in. I never saw the like of this old house – it will tumble about our ears I reckon, one day or another, and yet my lady is always repairing it.’ The inheritance and running of the Hall are disputed by corrupt clergy, tricky lawyers, upper and lower servants representing capitalist and lower-class interests, and a gang of criminals hiding in the cellars. Smith’s plot weighs the claims of the Hall’s actual owner, its would-be owners and its most deserving owners as part of a skilful reformist argument about the ownership of England and the political and social divide between the over-privileged and the dispossessed. She began writing the book in the summer of 1792 and the doubts produced by the massacre that September of prisoners in Paris are written into the plot. Though her hero and illegitimate heroine are obviously the most deserving owners, they have no legal right to the Hall – this is of course Smith’s point. They are torn between obedience to parents and authority figures, and the wish to make a new life independent of tradition. In this way the familiar ingredients of the love story are turned into a contemporary political fable. The house metaphor was used in her later novels, but never so successfully after the Terror.

Jane Austen read Smith’s novels as they appeared through her teens and early twenties. At 14 she professed to idolise Delamere, the impetuous half-mad lover who loses the heroine of Smith’s first novel, Emmeline, to a naval officer. Austen’s Catharine in The Bower, a fragment among the juvenilia, refers to Smith’s novels as ‘books universally read and admired, and that have given rise perhaps to more frequent arguments than any other of the same sort’, and Catharine is quite a good reader. Austen enjoyed Smith’s acerbity and the emotional extremism of her characters, though as a Christian and a Tory she grew increasingly hostile to her ideas. As well as being pro-Revolution, Smith was mildly deist and soft on fallen women and divorce. But Austen saw what Smith was doing with her political houses, and created her own great estates – Pemberley, Mansfield Park and Donwell Abbey – as reassuring emblems of a more just England where some improvement might be needed, but no change of ownership. Of all Rayland Hall’s descendants, Mansfield Park, Chesney Wold, Howards End, Wragby Hall and many others, only Mansfield Park fills its novel so completely.

Smith was born Charlotte Turner in 1749 to a landed Sussex family. Her mother died in childbirth when she was three, and her father overspent his income sufficiently in the next 11 years to take the advice of friends and find himself an heiress. Charlotte was by now fully grown, attractive and witty. She disliked what she saw as the pretentiousness of her middleaged future stepmother. But the heiress objected to being made fun of by a satirical 14-year-old, and stipulated that Charlotte shouldn’t live at home after the marriage. A match was arranged for her with the son of a wealthy West India merchant, and at the age of 15 she was ‘sold, a legal prostitute’, as she put it long afterwards, to Benjamin Smith. There followed a rapid succession of children, some of whom died; Benjamin meanwhile grew more feckless and violent. When he was sent to the King’s Bench prison for embezzlement, she joined him there, using the time to prepare Elegiac Sonnets and Other Essays for publication. It was printed in Chichester in 1784 at her own expense and was very popular, although she didn’t make as much money from it as she hoped. The night before the Smiths were released from King’s Bench a group of prisoners tried to blow the walls down with gunpowder, but the couple got safely away and went to Normandy with their children: Benjamin was still in debt and had to stay out of England. Living in a ruinous unheated castle during the winter of 1784-5, Smith translated Manon Lescaut for an English publisher and, after a labour she didn’t expect to survive, had her 12th and last baby. The success of the Sonnets, combined with her determination not to risk another pregnancy, seems to have led her to insist on a separation when the family returned to England. She looked after their surviving nine children while her husband settled in Scotland to avoid his creditors, making occasional forays south, in disguise, to try to collect his wife’s book money which was legally his. His father left a complicated will meant to provide for his grandchildren and guard against his son’s extravagance, but it was so badly drawn up that it was almost certainly a model for the Jarndyce and Jarndyce lawsuit in Bleak House. The suit wasn’t settled until 37 years after Benjamin’s father’s death; by then, his son and daughter-in-law were dead, and the little money left by the lawyers came too late to help their children.

Smith died in 1806, leaving 65 volumes of poems, novels and children’s books. Her poems have been collected and admirably annotated by Stuart Curran at the Brown University Women Writers Project. The edition gathers together all the Elegiac Sonnets that appeared in the 1780s and 1790s, and two longish blank verse poems, ‘The Emigrants’ and ‘Beachy Head’, as well as animal fables and occasional verse more jaunty than she generally allowed herself to be. Lacking the wit of the prose, the sonnets blazon the author’s sensibility, her capacity to suffer and to sympathise. Curran describes her as the first poet in England whom in retrospect we could call Romantic and claims that she anticipates Wordsworth. But the characters in Lyrical Ballads are the poor and outcast, whereas in Smith’s sonnets sensibility in grief is generally restricted to the better educated. ‘Written in Farm Wood’ contrasts the peasant’s lot with her own:

                                                           all his hours
To wholesome labour given, or thoughtless mirth,
No pangs of sorrow past, or coming dread,
Bend his unconscious spirit down to earth.

But she could sometimes treat the same subject in a less patronising way. In ‘To Sleep’ she writes:

Clasp’d in her faithful shepherds sheltering arms
Well may the village girl sweet slumbers prove,
And they, O gentle Sleep! still taste thy charms
Who wake to labour, liberty and love.

Her early verse is preoccupied with death and suicide; in six sonnets the speaker, Werther, is presented without irony. The sonnets are only loosely related to The Sorrows of Young Werther, a cult book with spin-offs in teacups and yellow britches. Goethe’s Werther actively defies society, killing himself before he can be corrupted. There’s little energy in Smith’s Werther sonnets, and some are just an assortment of inert metaphors. Metrically, however, she is sensitive and flexible, and this is her great distinct ion as a sonneteer. Her most successful tone is gothic and macabre. ‘Written in the Churchyard at Middleton in Sussex’ describes graves gutted by the sea as the coast erodes. The tide

Tears from their grassy tombs the village dead
And breaks the silent Sabbath of the grave,

stripping the bones among shells and seaweed while the speaker looks on in envy. Although she could be belligerent in person and in her letters, in the sonnets she only shows her vulnerable side. In the octave of ‘On some rude fragment of the rocky shore’, a female speaker sits on a bleak beach watching a storm where

O’er the dark waves the winds tempestuous howl,
The screaming seabird quits the troubled sea,

and compares herself in the sestet to a shipwrecked sailor. The conceit is drawn out with strained ingenuity to the final lines:

Faint and more faint are heard his feeble cries
Till in the rising tide, the exhausted sufferer dies.

In her blank verse Smith developed the reflexiveness of landscape setting and speaker with more philosophical and political overtones. ‘The Emigrants’ concerns the exile of French aristocrats and clergy lucky enough to have escaped in 1793, and the violence spreading through France. Her loyalties were changing fast that year, and her dedication refers to the ‘dreadful scenes that have been enacted in the past summer’. The poem reminisces about her childhood freedom, wading into the Arun for willow herb and flags – a freedom lost in marriage. Her sorrows may seem intrusive, but like The Prelude, the poem is about the growth of the poet’s mind and her angle of vision: the external world is inseparable from the sensibility that contemplates it.

Passages of self-revelation contained within a larger subject show the growing confidence of her poetic voice. She makes her bleeding heart a pageant for England as Byron supposedly did for all Europe, and includes her personal history, motherhood, family quarrels, debts and lawsuits. Like other Jacobin writers such as Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Hays and Elizabeth Inchbald, she was defining for herself attitudes which were just starting to be termed ‘radical’: beliefs connecting the private with the national life and so politicising sex and the family.

During her last illness she was still working on ‘Beachy Head’, which combines reflection with striking land and seascapes. It was published posthumously by Joseph Johnson, who had published many radical writers in the 1790s, though Smith met him when the more exciting times for his house were over, and only her last few books have his imprint. ‘Beachy Head’ brings together botanising, speculation on fossil forms, Sussex history including the Viking and Norman invasions, a scholar-gipsy figure, looters of ships wrecked on the coast and a hermit in a cave at the cliff base. It sounds like a ragbag but coheres thanks to its sense of the permanence of nature, from which the marks made by human societies are easily effaced.

Many of her poems appeared first in the novels. Smith’s heroes and heroines are often poets whose verses are given in full, and then transferred to new editions of Elegiac Sonnets as they came out. The effect of this is to pull the fictional characters out of their stories and to link their distresses more closely with her own. This is especially true of her last novel, The Young Philosopher (1798), written after her daughter Augusta had died, possibly from TB. Smith believed that crooked lawyers had deprived Augusta of the money that would have bought her a chance of survival. In the preface to her previous novel, she violently attacked the legal profession, and Smith wrote herself into The Young Philosopher as the older heroine, Laura, who goes mad after the abduction of her daughter by a crooked lawyer.

The literary value of most of the sonnets is doubtful, but the blank verse and fiction have style and wit and I very much hope that this volume will be followed by a reissue of some of the novels.

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Letters

Vol. 17 No. 20 · 19 October 1995

Claudia Johnson (Letters, 5 October) defines two strains of Austen criticism. She argues convincingly for Terry Castle’s anti-normative Austen but does less than justice to what she calls – unfairly, I think – the elegiac reading In my review of Charlotte Smith’s poems (LRB, 21 September) I suggested that Austen’s houses, emblems of England, were created in reaction to the pro-revolutionary Smith’s crumbling English architecture. Austen’s houses need improvement but not demolition or (until Persuasion) a change of ownership, and she knows that this is a point of view that needs to be argued for, not taken for granted. Surely readers can acknowledge the strongly Tory and Christian element in Austen without being pushed into the Austen Heritage Park, nostalgic for a serene past where nothing out of the ordinary happens.

J. Woolley (Letters, 5 October) does not clarify the current debate. She – or he – is lyrical on the marriage of true minds of Elinor and Marianne, ‘a single whole, true twain, concordant one’, but says that this is ‘nothing at all to do with the masked or unconscious homoeroticism that might be induced by the warmth of the sisterly shared bed of Terry Castle’s imagining’. Woolley seems not to have read Castle’s letter of 24 August, where she defines what she means by homoeroticism. The warm bed Marianne shares with Elinor and leaves to write her last miserable letter to Willoughby is of Austen’s imagining, not Castle’s. As with Shakespeare, to whom she’s best compared, there can be no definitive Austen. In all the novels there’s plenty to tug against traditional constructions of class and gender. Nevertheless, the traditional constructions are vividly there.

Loraine Fletcher
University of Reading

send letters to

The Editor
London Review of Books
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address and a telephone number

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.