In the latest issue:

Real Men Go to Tehran

Adam Shatz

What Trump doesn’t know about Iran

Patrick Cockburn

Kaiser Karl V

Thomas Penn

The Hostile Environment

Catherine Hall

Social Mobilities

Adam Swift

Short Cuts: So much for England

Tariq Ali

What the jihadis left behind

Nelly Lahoud

Ray Strachey

Francesca Wade

C.J. Sansom

Malcolm Gaskill

At the British Museum: ‘Troy: Myth and Reality’

James Davidson

Poem: ‘The Lion Tree’

Jamie McKendrick


Jenny Turner

Boys in Motion

Nicholas Penny

‘Trick Mirror’

Lauren Oyler

Diary: What really happened in Yancheng?

Long Ling


Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website ( — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.

  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.

When​ people in Kisumu, in western Kenya, began voting on a Tuesday morning in early August it was more like a party than an election. At the Kenyatta Sports Ground, a large triangle of dirt and trees in the city centre, whistles blew, vuvuzelas honked and drums banged; there was shouting, laughing, singing, cheering, even dancing. Cigarette smoke and the smell of booze drifted up from boisterous clumps of young men. Other voters smiled and chatted as they queued in their hundreds, some with babies swaddled in polyester blankets. It was 4.45 in the morning, still dark and more than an hour before the polling stations were due to open, yet new arrivals were latecomers already. To work out which of the dozen growing lines of people they should join, they used the torchlights on their mobile phones to read lists of names taped to a breezeblock wall beside a sign declaring the availability of ‘Clean Executive Toilets & Bathroom’. At the front of each queue stood a police officer with an AK-type rifle. Behind each police officer, inside little pagoda tents, officials in yellow reflective vests branded IEBC (the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission) worked by gaslight to prepare ballot boxes, papers and fingerprint-operated electronic voting machines.

Kenyan voters go beyond the grudging apathy of their Western counterparts: one person one vote isn’t a chore but something to celebrate. I met people who queued to vote and then drove about, collecting the elderly and infirm and ferrying them to polling stations. Ronald Ngala, a T-shirt beneath his dark suit jacket bearing the logo ‘Kenya Daima’ (‘Kenya for ever’ in Kiswahili), had arrived before midnight hoping to be the first to vote. ‘In 2013 I was sixth in line!’ His plan was to vote quickly then leap in his Toyota Corolla to fetch others for whom the journey to the polling station was too expensive or arduous, or who couldn’t be bothered. ‘Some people take voting for granted and they’re the same, same people who complain about bad leadership.’

I spent the day driving to polling stations in different parts of Kisumu as the temperature soared towards 40°C. Long into the evening, diligent officials counted ballot papers, scanning the results into tablet computers and transmitting them to constituency and national tally centres. Late that night I came across a polling station next to a playground across the road from the Octopus Bottoms Up Club, where the returning officer and his colleagues had been at work for more than 24 hours. They were surrounded by empty soft-drinks bottles and a woman was asleep on the table. ‘I think the machine is tired too,’ the returning officer said as he struggled to scan the tally sheet.

Despite the exuberance of polling day, elections in Kenya are usually tinged with a degree of tension and fear. The ethnic logic of Kenyan politics means that political differences tend to resolve along ethnic lines. Since a ‘multi-party’ system replaced the one-party state in 1992, all but one of past five elections have been scarred by violence. In 2007 more than 1100 people were killed and half a million made homeless during two months of politically motivated ethnic violence that tore through the Rift Valley, raging in the slums of Nairobi and across Kisumu. Trigger-happy police were responsible for a third of the killings. Others were carried out by tribal gangs using machetes, bows and arrows, rocks, clubs and arson.

As the poll approached last month, the gap between the leading candidates, President Uhuru Kenyatta, a Kikuyu, and Raila Odinga, the leader of the perennial Luo opposition, grew ever narrower. Each side appeared convinced it would win and that losing would be proof of the other’s fraud. Theirs is a dynastic rivalry stretching back half a century to Kenya’s independence in 1963. Kenyatta, the 55-year-old millionaire son of the country’s first president, fought his campaign on the evidence of economic growth and big infrastructure, delivered during his first term, which began in 2013. Odinga, the 72-year-old son of the country’s first vice president, campaigned against inequality and corruption. Both men formed alliances with politicians from smaller tribes, and ethnic allegiances seemed to say more to the voters than any of the campaign rhetoric.

When I went to sleep late on Tuesday night it seemed as if Kenya had dodged a bullet. But in the small hours on Wednesday morning Odinga rejected the provisional results from some polling stations published on the election commission website, which gave Kenyatta an early lead. Later in a televised press conference, Odinga, who is overwhelmingly popular in Kisumu, a Luo stronghold, dismissed the entire election as an ‘attack on democracy’ and said: ‘You can only cheat the people for so long.’ His followers in Kisumu were quick to react. From a distance an urban riot in Kenya is signalled by plumes of black smoke rising into the sky. Further in, tear gas prickles at the back of the nose and throat and stings the eyes. Then the sound of shouting, breaking glass, splintering rocks. Finally the sight of hundreds of young men, flaming barricades and boulders strewn across the road.

I headed for Kondele, a poor northern neighbourhood of Kisumu, with a large roundabout beneath a new multi-lane flyover. ‘No Raila, no peace!’ the crowds chanted as tyres burned beside them. A contingent of around two dozen riot police advanced towards them, batons, shields and rifles at the ready. ‘No Raila, no peace!’ the protesters screamed as they fled from a volley of tear gas. Repairing to the flyover for a clear view I watched as a water truck extinguished a fire, which was relit moments later. A police helicopter circled. Protesters lobbed rocks and set new fires. ‘They should not do that,’ a man standing next to me said. ‘It is a waste of people’s resources. They are burning the things of the common wananchi’ (‘ordinary people’ in Swahili). A chorus of ‘Uhuru must go!’ from the protesters below was followed by the more dangerous ‘Kikuyus must go!’ Three of Kenya’s four presidents since independence, including Uhuru Kenyatta, have been Kikuyus.

Later, I joined a group of Kenyan, European and American journalists to speak to some of the protesters. Some were drunk, some angry, some friendly. They performed for our cameras, brandishing rocks and leaping over fires. Beyond them we found a contingent of police, sweating in helmets and flak jackets. A couple of cops sat in a pick-up, their G3 rifles pointed at the crowd. The police, perhaps a dozen in all, were cut off front and rear by hundreds of protesters. So were we. As rocks began to rain down, and police fired into the crowd – first tear gas, then bullets, which we later worked out from the casings were blanks – we left. In our undignified retreat – we looked like members of a fetishists’ athletics club, in gas masks, goggles and protective headgear – we sought out alleys that would take us off the main road and away from the street fighting. The first was a dead end; in the second I spotted a muscular man in a tank top and woolly balaclava whirling a sling above his head. In due course we found a clear exit and ducked out, residents pointing us the way to safety. By nightfall the protesters had worn themselves out and the police had returned to their barracks.

The following morning opposition leaders claimed to have evidence of hacking and widespread rigging. They demanded that Odinga be declared president-elect. The cry was taken up in Kondele where a crowd gathered once again, this time in celebration. Waving leafy branches and blowing vuvuzelas the crowd did a dishevelled clockwise conga around the roundabout, singing as riot police looked on – but they must have known their celebrations were premature. A day later opposition officials staged a walkout at the national tally centre in Nairobi: enough of ‘fraudulent elections’. For a while that night I watched the results on a television in a bar in Kisumu, until the staff, sensing trouble was afoot, threw us out and padlocked the door. After reading out the result from every one of the 290 constituencies the election commission chairman declared Kenyatta the winner with 54 per cent of the vote.

The reaction was instant. I heard a woman wailing, then a man screaming in fury. The rumble of angry voices grew louder. Someone banged repeatedly on the corrugated iron sheets of the shacks in the marketplace. The helicopter was back, a searchlight scanning the slum. From behind us police in trenchcoats and tin helmets, carrying rifles and sticks, walked silently towards the orange glow of burning tyres. Pops and bangs echoed around Kondele and its adjacent neighbourhoods. Soon, gunshots followed: too many, too fast, to be anything but live rounds. Were the police shooting into the air or into the crowd? The stand-offs and battles continued well into the night. Residents said police chased protesters and kicked down doors, filling homes with tear gas and beating the people they found inside. There were similar scenes in parts of Nairobi.

The next morning I visited the local hospital and found a man with a bullet wound in his chest. Another, unable to speak, had been shot in the jaw. A third was bandaged where a bullet had passed through his thigh. Michael Oluoch, sitting up on a gurney in the corridor, claimed not to be a protester: somewhat implausibly he said he had just been out shopping for meat. In any case, police had shot him too. He was 21. In another hospital a six-month-old girl, Samantha Pendo, was in a coma after police cracked her skull with a baton: her parents said it had happened when their house was raided.

Human rights groups believe that at least two dozen people died in the protests that followed the final election results: a relatively small number in the long history of political violence in Kenya. As Odinga and his colleagues prevaricated the protests fizzled. People wanted to get back to work. A week after the election, Odinga said he would challenge the results in the Supreme Court, calling Kenyatta a ‘computer-generated’ president, a reference to opposition allegations that the electronic tally system was hacked. The petition was filed on 18 August. When Odinga went to the courts after the 2013 election, he lost. This time he is calling for the election to be annulled and rerun. At the time of writing, the judges have seven days left to make their ruling.

25 August

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.