In the latest issue:

Real Men Go to Tehran

Adam Shatz

What Trump doesn’t know about Iran

Patrick Cockburn

Kaiser Karl V

Thomas Penn

The Hostile Environment

Catherine Hall

Social Mobilities

Adam Swift

Short Cuts: So much for England

Tariq Ali

What the jihadis left behind

Nelly Lahoud

Ray Strachey

Francesca Wade

C.J. Sansom

Malcolm Gaskill

At the British Museum: ‘Troy: Myth and Reality’

James Davidson

Poem: ‘The Lion Tree’

Jamie McKendrick


Jenny Turner

Boys in Motion

Nicholas Penny

Jia Tolentino

Lauren Oyler

Diary: What really happened in Yancheng?

Long Ling

Short Cuts: Harry Goes Rogue

Jonathan Parry


Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website ( — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.

  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.

I sometimes have​ bad dreams about being back in the army. It’s not that the experience of National Service was entirely unpleasant; indeed some of it was highly enjoyable. But even at the best of times there was a sense of living in an open prison. In my case, this oppressive sense of unfreedom lay in the knowledge that it would be many long months before I would see my family again or take up my scholarship at Oxford. It was a miserable moment when I looked out of the window of the train carrying us to the troopship in Southampton, only to see the towers and spires of the university city flash past, so near and yet so remote.

Until the publication of Richard Vinen’s superb history, the best accounts of National Service were fictional: David Lodge’s Ginger, You’re Barmy is a particularly successful evocation of the miseries and absurdities of the conscript’s life.* But Vinen, who was born in 1963, when the last national serviceman was demobbed, draws on memoirs, interviews and official records, to evoke and analyse past experience in a way which will command the unqualified assent and appreciation of those who were there at the time. If anyone wants proof that historians really can recover the truth about the past, this book will provide it.

My own experience was exactly what Vinen would have predicted for a shy, if upwardly mobile, grammar school boy. I was conscripted in 1950, just after the period of service had been increased from 18 months to two years because of the Korean emergency. My future college insisted that I should do my National Service before coming up. It was a sensible rule, as I would have sunk without trace had I been plunged at the age of 17 into the sophisticated world of postwar Balliol, but it meant that I was a year younger than most of my fellow conscripts.

I did basic training in the infantry at the Welsh depot in Brecon. I failed the officer selection board (WOSB), and was transferred from the Welch Regiment to the First Battalion of the Royal Welch Fusiliers, where I became an orderly room clerk. This was a piece of good fortune for me, but not for my former companions in the Welch Regiment, who went to fight in Korea, a destination from which some of them never returned. By contrast, the RWF sailed to peaceful Jamaica, where I spent the next 18 months, eventually reaching the rank of corporal. (I discover in Vinen that I was saved from Korea because only those aged 19 or older could be sent there.) Demobbed in 1952, I had to attend Territorial Army summer camps for the next three years, by then as an officer in the Royal Engineers.

My first fortnight of basic training was traumatic. Immediately on arrival, we were lined up to be vaccinated and given four roughly administered injections. The painful swelling in my arm was as nothing compared with the horrors of the barrack room. I had never been away from home before and, having grown up in the countryside, knew little about the industrial working class. I found myself surrounded by miners, steel-workers and labourers, who had never possessed pyjamas, who when they spoke of ‘books’ meant the Dandy or the Beano, and whose conversation was an unbroken stream of obscenity. The gloom was leavened only by the banal pop songs of the day, sung repeatedly as we sat blancoing belts and polishing boots: ‘A man without a woman is like a ship without a sail, a boat without a rudder, a fish without a tail.’ None of this would bother me now; indeed, after years studying what historians call popular culture, I would find it interesting that the song ‘Silver Dollar’, composed in 1907, should still have been around in 1950. But I had led a sheltered life and in my priggish innocence it seemed as if I had been plunged into a Dantesque hell.

There were other humiliations. In the tests designed to identify those of subnormal intelligence, I proved unable to assemble a bicycle pump. Years later I discovered that this failure put me in a distinguished succession. Tom Harrisson, ornithologist, explorer and a founder of Mass-Observation, is only one of several notables who had a similar experience. Even so, my mechanical ineptitude lent a singular irony to my eventual posting to the Royal Engineers.

Things got better when I was moved to another hut filled mostly with grammar school boys who were regarded as potential officers or NCOs. Basic training, however, continued to be unpleasant. I didn’t mind the square-bashing or even the bayonet practice: plunging one’s weapon into a sack of straw never for a moment felt like the real thing. Sleeping out in the snow on an exercise in the Brecon Beacons was quite exciting. But the threat of being ‘back-squadded’ – having to do the six weeks all over again – hung over me because to complete the course you had to pass in PE and I couldn’t climb a rope however hard I tried. But of course, when the time came, nobody cared whether I could climb a rope or not.

‘Clerks,’ Vinen writes, ‘were usually men who were too well educated to stay in the ranks but too plebeian, obviously lacking in martial qualities or rebellious, to become officers.’ Far from being rebellious, I was in those days obsequiously conformist, and my parents (a successful tenant farmer and a former schoolteacher) would have bridled at the suggestion that they were plebeian. But I was certainly lacking in martial qualities. In the test for potential officers at the WOSB, the squad under my hesitant leadership, when required to transport a huge log across a bridge, managed to drop it into what was supposed, for the purposes of the exercise, to be a raging torrent below. When asked at my interview whether I could imagine myself leading men into battle, I was unable to give a convincing reply. I knew nothing about the army. No members of my family had ever done military service – agriculture was a reserved occupation – and Welsh grammar schools did not have cadet corps. When I was posted to the Territorial Army I was sent to another WOSB and passed easily, but by then I was a young gentleman from Balliol.

Vinen, who is very interested in class, stresses that the army had a firmly binary structure into which grammar school boys did not fit easily. There were officers and there were other ranks, with nothing in between; warrant officers were drawn from long-serving members of other ranks. In the regular army, the officers typically came from the upper middle class and landed gentry, and the other ranks from the rough end of the working class. This left little room for the people in the middle, who, as in Hilaire Belloc’s poem, looked ‘out of place and mean, and horribly embarrassed’.

The troopship Dilwara, in which the battalion travelled to Jamaica, had been built in 1936. With its strict segregation of officers, who travelled in first-class luxury, and other ranks, who were crowded together in squalid conditions below the water line, it embodied the social assumptions of the prewar era; and its sadistic staff resembled prison guards. I managed to lose my meal ticket; I found it again, but it was taken for granted that I had stolen it and for the rest of the voyage I was ignominiously marched to and from the canteen.

Once arrived in Jamaica, however, the orderly room clerks, because of their socially anomalous position, had rather a good time. We were a congenial little band with our own barrack room; and I was allowed to keep a sizeable library in my locker (though my reading was not as highbrow as my fellow historian Peter Burke’s during his stint as a pay clerk in Singapore, which in a typical two days, Vinen tells us, included Galileo, Gide and Rimbaud). Although subject to weekly parades and periodic kit inspections, we were excused weapon training and most other military duties. We also enjoyed a certain cachet, because it was widely assumed that we were privy to the battalion’s secrets. We enjoyed reading the confidential reports on junior officers and we received extra helpings in the cookhouse because the cooks, who were mostly regular soldiers on a long-term posting in the Caribbean, wrongly believed that we were in a position to help them bring their families to Jamaica from the UK or get them special leave to go home.

The battalion’s official duty in Jamaica was to assist the civil power: that is, to uphold the status quo during what turned out to be the last years before decolonisation. Under the labour leader Alexander Bustamante, pressure for Jamaican independence was mounting, and there were anti-colonial demonstrations all over the Caribbean. The RWF had one company permanently stationed in British Honduras, where dissatisfaction with British rule was particularly intense, and from time to time the battalion was required to send other troops to curb protesters in Antigua, Grenada and British Guiana. But such encounters were non-violent and there was no parallel to the atrocities which involved national servicemen in Malaya, Kenya and Cyprus.

As well as learning how to disperse rioters, the soldiers performed ceremonial duties such as mounting a guard of honour for the arrival of the new governor, Hugh Foot. They also helped out in moments of difficulty, such as the emergency triggered in August 1951 by Hurricane Charlie. This was Jamaica’s greatest natural disaster of the 20th century, with 17 inches of rainfall in a few hours, gusts of 125 mph, more than 150 deaths and thousands of injuries. It was the only occasion when the orderly room clerks were issued with live ammunition. The wind had blown down the walls of the local prison and seventy inmates, some of them due to be hanged that week, escaped to the hills. We were sent to find them. To our relief, we failed to do so, though we managed to lose one of our number, who spent the night wandering in the hills.

As the 23rd of Foot, the Royal Welch Fusiliers were not without social pretensions or indeed literary ones; I took vicarious pride in knowing that it had been the regiment of Robert Graves, Siegfried Sassoon and David Jones. They had no successors in my time. In Jamaica the officers lived a cheerfully philistine life, playing polo, attending cocktail parties and spending weekends on the beaches of the north coast. The other ranks took their pleasures where they could find them. For the regular soldiers this usually meant the brothels of Kingston. On return to camp they were required to attend the grandly named Prophylactic Ablution Centre. Those who failed to do so and then contracted VD could end up in a military prison. An additional deterrent was the rumoured treatment for gonorrhoea, said to involve an instrument resembling a folded umbrella, which was inserted into the sufferer’s penis, opened up and then pulled out.

My own life was nothing if not chaste. I didn’t smoke or drink beer, or even tea or coffee. Duties in the orderly room were undemanding and I spent much of my leisure time playing cricket. On one occasion we played against a side that included Alf Valentine, the young spinner who took eight wickets in the first innings of his first Test against England in 1950. Unfortunately, it poured with rain. Undaunted, our hosts poured petrol on the pitch. A huge pall of black smoke rose over the ground and we resumed play on an extreme version of a rapidly drying wicket. Jamaican cricket involved a good deal of audience participation and my own delivery of slow leg-breaks was frequently accompanied by cries of ‘Mash him up, man! This is no bowler!’ The battalion’s cricket coach was a former West Indies Test cricketer who a few years later was hanged for murder. By that time I was at All Souls, where one of my senior colleagues was a member of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council that rejected his appeal.

‘Join the army and see the world,’ said the recruiting posters of the day; and in Jamaica even clerks had some opportunities to travel. We twice climbed Blue Mountain Peak (7400 feet high, but covered in mist when we got there). We also spent idle days by the white sands and transparent blue waters of Doctor’s Cave in Montego Bay. A more daring trip was to the Cockpit Country, home of the Maroons, descendants of escaped slaves, who in the 18th century had, after several wars with British troops, been allowed to remain in this remote and inaccessible area in a state of semi-independence. It was said that no white men ever went there. After a long trek on foot our unheralded arrival one evening at the Maroon town of Accompong caused consternation. We were ushered into a large barn, where by the light of oil lamps we were interrogated as to the reasons for our intrusion and involved in a lengthy, arcane, and on both sides seriously under-informed debate as to whether or not the treaty of 1738 allowed us to be there. Understandably, the Maroons decided that it didn’t.

Almost as exciting was a visit in March 1952 to Guantánamo Bay, then as now a base for the US Marines, though without its later associations. A friend and I managed to attach ourselves to the battalion’s rifle team, who were travelling to Cuba on the cruiser HMS Sheffield for a shooting match against the marines. We were amazed by the luxurious facilities on the American base and, after the postwar austerities of our army food, which mostly came out of tins, we were thrilled to discover unlimited supplies of steak, chops, chicken and ice cream. We also learned that an American recruit in training was paid as much as a British lieutenant after four years’ service. There was a marked contrast between our bored cynicism and the determined attitude of the marines. To our astonishment, they actually enjoyed being soldiers and even spent their pocket money on sending away for books on weapon training.

Our time in Cuba coincided with the military coup which brought back the dictator Fulgencio Batista. But though we travelled by bus up the island as far as Camagüey and saw a good deal of decaying baroque splendour, the revolution eluded us. We spent a week cruising on the Sheffield while its crew practised firing their ear-splitting six-inch guns. Living conditions were infinitely worse than on the Dilwara. Each mess deck, about 15 yards square, accommodated forty men. There was no fixed place to sleep; the ratings hung their hammocks anywhere or just flopped down on the floor. The watch system meant that no one got a complete night’s sleep anyway. It was easy to see why Samuel Johnson thought that a sailor’s life was like being in jail with the chance of being drowned.

I wrote home regularly and my mother kept my letters. Reading them sixty years later, I feel intense embarrassment. The writer’s views on politics and race are callow and distasteful. Repelled by Kingston’s crowded and filthy conditions, this bigoted youth attributed the poverty that surrounded him to the inherent idleness and fecklessness of the black Jamaicans. He was equally scornful about their desire for self-government. A character in Ian McEwan’s novel The Children Act remarks that all of us had beliefs at the age of 17 that would embarrass us now. Vinen found that it was not unusual for ex-national servicemen to be shocked when they reread their diaries and letters. He tells us that Paul Foot (Hugh Foot’s son) found it painful to read the diary he kept at the time of Suez; and he suggests that most conscripts who expressed political opinions merely adopted those of their parents. That was certainly true of me. I went to Jamaica with the views I had imbibed from my father and mother and I returned with them unchanged. Vinen quotes Peter Burke’s flattering suggestion that Jamaica created my interest in anthropological approaches to history, but it is, alas, not true. I had some interesting encounters with Rastafarians, but I saw them then as comic curiosities, not subjects for serious study, leave alone respect. It was not Jamaica, but Balliol and All Souls that widened my horizons and turned me into the leftish liberal I now am.

I remember no discussion of politics in our barrack room, other than the rumour that if Churchill got back in the 1951 general election he would extend the period of National Service to three years. We were thoroughly unpolitical and barely aware that our role was the doubtful one of trying to hold together the crumbling remains of the British Empire. National Service produced very few radical dissenters; and ex-national servicemen seldom became the student rebels of the 1960s. But neither did they necessarily become timid conformists. Their experience taught them that it was futile to protest against orders, but easy to circumvent them in practice. It was in the army that many innocent young men first learned how to ‘skive’, evade responsibility and look out for a ‘cushy’ billet. Vinen rightly concludes that ‘far from being an institution that took “bad lads” and exposed them to the brisk regularity of military life, National Service often took “good boys” and exposed them to a world of profanity, petty crime and almost pathological enthusiasm to avoid hard work.’

To fly us home the army had chartered an ancient Avro York aeroplane operated by a private company called the Lancashire Aircraft Corporation. The War Office had decided that this was the most economical form of transport. It took several days to reach England, with prolonged stops at Bermuda and Gander, Newfoundland. A few months afterwards the same plane, carrying the latest batch of troops and their families to Jamaica, disappeared shortly after leaving Gander.

What do I retain from this experience of more than sixty years ago? Not much. I have a shameful taste for military bands and films about army life, like Tunes of Glory, with Alec Guinness and John Mills. An intense dislike of denim, which I associate with fatigues and servility, has deterred me from ever wearing jeans. I love to hear a Jamaican accent and, despite its violence and gang warfare, I still think of the island’s extraordinary beauty. Crucially, what I took away from my National Service was a resolution that when at last I got to Oxford I would do my best never to leave it.

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.


Vol. 37 No. 5 · 5 March 2015

Keith Thomas is surely right that one of the most insidious legacies of National Service was its elevation of inactivity to a fine art (LRB, 5 February). I can’t, however, agree that most of us emerged with our views on politics and society unchanged. I entered the services as a lukewarm Anglican with a vague belief in the inherent superiority of British values. The coup de grâce to my religious convictions was applied by an army padre putting a squaddie on a charge for failing to salute him. My confidence in the Dixon of Dock Green bobby was severely shaken by the practices and attitudes of Her Majesty’s Constabulary seconded to Cyprus to assist in security operations. My belief in a free, frank and fearless press foundered as I witnessed Barbara Castle pilloried daily for her exposure of what was going on there. And any illusions I clung to concerning the tommy’s exemplary discipline were dispelled when, following the murder of the wife of a British sergeant in 1958, random Cypriot males were rounded up and brought to our camp for muscular interrogation.

Looking back, I was certainly handicapped by a loss of two years in career progression compared to those who managed to evade the call-up and, unlike in France, that shortfall wasn’t compensated for by taking the time into account in calculating pension entitlement. Moreover, friends of mine in France who, like me, were on active service still receive annually a substantial three-figure gratuity from a grateful nation. But then in France every government still contains a ministre des anciens combattants.

David Minns
St Georges les Bains, France

I missed service in the forces, though the prospect loomed over my adolescent years. My brother, John, a grammar school boy, was conscripted into the Royal Artillery in 1953, and chose to do his service before he went to Cambridge. He started as a gunner and never progressed. He failed the officer selection test because he had physically helped his team to build a bridge. He was, I think, in the rebellious category of national servicemen. The army took him to Egypt and the Canal Zone, where he ran an office under canvas. He learned to type and earned an extra 6d a week, ‘efficiency money’. One day he was offered a driving test, which he had listed himself for. He wasn’t ready for it but went through the motions; he was told he had failed and to fill in the paperwork necessary. He went away and did the paperwork, certifying himself as having passed. He could drive any vehicle thereafter, and wasn’t troubled by a driving test again.

Returning home on a troopship, he and some others avoided the futile tasks they would have been given to do elsewhere on the ship and instead sat on deckchairs at the stern of the ship, reading. When asked, ‘What are you men doing here?’ he stood up and answered: ‘Man overboard picket, sir.’ They were left to carry on.

I once asked him why he had never smoked, since cigarettes were cheap, or free, in the British army. ‘I would never do anything the army wanted me to do,’ he replied.

Gerald O’Callaghan
Beverley, Yorkshire

The army didn’t require manners. A friend of mine, put forward for the officer selection test, was too polite. As he came up to the first hurdle on the obstacle course he saw a fellow soldier approaching alongside. ‘After you,’ he said. Like Keith Thomas, he was failed.

Sandra Spears
London W10

Vol. 37 No. 4 · 19 February 2015

Like Keith Thomas I too was called into National Service in 1950 (LRB, 5 February). Like him, I avoided transportation to Korea and was excused the atrocities committed by British forces in Kenya, Malaya and Cyprus. Otherwise my military service was somewhat different from his. On being mustered, I was very quickly transferred from an unearthly spot in Yorkshire to the Household Cavalry barracks in Windsor. I spent two years as a motorcycle dispatch rider in the Life Guards. With the honourable exception of the riding master, all the commissioned officers were Etonians and little appeared to have changed since the Iron Duke himself ruled the roost in Whitehall.

I discovered (it was hard to miss) that there was a semi-organised ring of male prostitutes within the Guards known simply as ‘the business’. It was ignored by the authorities until an MP or suchlike was caught in one of the royal parks with a guardsman. As far as I know little was done to prevent similar things happening again and again. Newspaper coverage was minimal. On completing my two years with the Life Guards, I too served my remaining three and a half years in the Territorial Army. Little has surfaced of the disorder, the almost mutinous conditions and total collapse of military discipline in the TA.

Dennis Abey
London SW19

send letters to

The Editor
London Review of Books
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

Please include name, address and a telephone number

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.