In the latest issue:

Real Men Go to Tehran

Adam Shatz

What Trump doesn’t know about Iran

Patrick Cockburn

Kaiser Karl V

Thomas Penn

The Hostile Environment

Catherine Hall

Social Mobilities

Adam Swift

Short Cuts: So much for England

Tariq Ali

What the jihadis left behind

Nelly Lahoud

Ray Strachey

Francesca Wade

C.J. Sansom

Malcolm Gaskill

At the British Museum: ‘Troy: Myth and Reality’

James Davidson

Poem: ‘The Lion Tree’

Jamie McKendrick

SurrogacyTM

Jenny Turner

Boys in Motion

Nicholas Penny

Jia Tolentino

Lauren Oyler

Diary: What really happened in Yancheng?

Long Ling

Short Cuts: Harry Goes Rogue

Jonathan Parry

Jigsaw MummiesTom Shippey
Close

Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website (www.lrb.co.uk — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.


  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.
Close
Pagan Britain 
by Ronald Hutton.
Yale, 480 pp., £25, November 2013, 978 0 300 19771 6
Show More
The King in the North: The Life and Times of Oswald of Northumbria 
by Max Adams.
Head of Zeus, 450 pp., £25, August 2013, 978 1 78185 418 1
Show More
Show More

The history​ of paganism in Britain spans more than thirty thousand years, almost the whole time that humans have inhabited these islands, bar a few state-enforced Christian centuries in the medieval and early modern periods. It also takes in many different kinds of belief, for some of which we have written records – Roman, Celtic, Anglo-Saxon, Norse – while others are known only from archaeology and from the landscape, which is still marked by many thousands of monuments, some large and obvious, most overgrown or unnoticed. The cairns and barrows and material evidence of grave rituals all signal belief of some kind, but the beliefs of the prehistoric millennia may have been as different from one another as any one of them was from the later documented religions; and the changes from one practice to another, like the change from long barrows to stone circles, or the later and sudden abandonment of henges, even the ‘superhenges’ that had taken a huge amount of labour to create, may have been the result of upheavals fully as great as the conversions of pagan Celts and Anglo-Saxons to Christianity.

Scholars know far more about the pagan millennia than they did even a few years ago, and more information is being unearthed all the time. A paradox that emerges from Ronald Hutton’s extraordinarily wide-ranging survey is that the more data archaeology supplies, the less sure we are of what it all means, or meant. Take the case of the Red Lady of Paviland on the Gower Peninsula, the earliest indication of religious sentiment in Britain. Here, in 1822, amateur archaeologists uncovered a headless skeleton, its bones stained with red ochre, buried with bracelets of mammoth ivory and broken wands. Its discoverers thought they had found the body of what Hutton calls ‘a lady of ill fame’ who had probably plied her trade at the Iron Age fort on the cliff above. We now know that the Red Lady was male, the bones have been dated to 32,000 bc, far earlier than the fort, and the careful arrangement of the body suggests that the dead man ‘most probably possessed some kind of spiritual function’. But what can it have been?

We can only guess, and it’s true that the temptation to make guesses about prehistoric paganism is immense, especially in Britain, where the signs of it are so visible. The beliefs of Stone and Bronze Age Britons were expressed in constructions that involved quite fabulous amounts of work. The six-mile-long ‘cursus’, or embanked walkway, outside Wimborne in Dorset represented half a million man-hours of labour, carried out by labourers using deer-horn picks and shovels made from the shoulder blades of cattle. The bank at Avebury would have taken a million hours. As for the time spent hauling stones and dressing them to a flat surface at Stonehenge (and some of these stones are sarsen, which is harder than granite), what can have motivated the masons to keep pounding away with their stone mauls? And Stonehenge is only one of twelve hundred henges discovered in the British Isles. They must mean something. But again, what?

Repeatedly Hutton confesses that we have ‘no reliable evidence’ and that ‘nothing is certain.’ Yet his survey also makes clear that a quantity of strange facts are being unearthed all the time. On South Uist, archaeologists thought they were on to something when they discovered human bodies under the floor of prehistoric roundhouses. They were buried there as dedications, surely, or maybe as a result of ancestor worship? Then it turned out that the bodies, preserved in peat bog, had been dead for centuries before being reburied. And even stranger, when examined in detail they turned out to be assemblages of several bodies: in effect, ‘jigsaw mummies’. Such careful and complex behaviour must mean something. But what?

What should we make of the chariot cemeteries of East Yorkshire? Most of the bodies face east, and are interred with the left foreleg of a sheep or pig, but some face west, in which case it is the right foreleg. The graves which contain actual chariots have a different system. Is this a matter of social gradations? Competing cults? Just as inscrutable is the much later Roman cremated while sitting in a chair with a cockerel in his lap. Was the cockerel a meal? To wake him up? A gift to Mercury? At Kimmeridge in Dorset, again in Roman times, a group of elderly women were buried with their severed heads, without lower jaws, placed by their feet, and each one was provided with a spindle whorl. Was this execution, or a rite de passage? Questions like this appear again and again throughout the book, with innumerable detailed and even forensic clues but no satisfactory answer.

This has never prevented people from coming up with solutions, on most of which Hutton pours regretful cold water. Over the last hundred years and more, it has been popular to think that past ages worshipped what is variously called the Great Mother, Earth Mother or Mother Goddess. Distinguished scholars pioneered the idea, including Sir Arthur Evans, who excavated Knossos, and the Cambridge classicist Jane Harrison, who proposed a prehistoric and peaceful woman-centred civilisation in Greece. The discovery of Palaeolithic ‘Venus figurines’, statuettes with exaggerated breasts and hips, seemed to support the notion. D.H. Lawrence, Robert Graves and Rudyard Kipling all picked up the idea, so that by the early 20th century, Mircea Eliade commented: ‘A “search for the Mother” had become a major component of the “unconscious nostalgias of the Western intellectual”.’ The only such figurine found in Britain, however, is probably a fake, and belief in passively fertile Mother Goddesses has now gone out of fashion.

Even where we have documentation, as we have for the paganisms of the first Christian millennium, we may think we know more than we do. We think we know that ‘Ancient Britons’ painted themselves blue with woad, that Celtic paganism involved nude female dancing, and that human sacrifice was carried out by the ubiquitous druids. Pliny reported the naked woad-stained processions of British women ‘at certain sacred rites’, and Tacitus gave a dramatic account of the ghastly practices of the druids on Anglesey. Neither report is reliable: Hutton describes the first as ‘salacious myth’, the other as atrocity propaganda. The child found with her skull split near the centre of Woodhenge was for a long time thought to be a victim of a barbaric ritual, like Lindow Man, who seems to have been strangled, hit on the head and had his throat cut; but in 2000 it was realised that the child’s skull had parted along unclosed suture lines – no axe was involved. She may have been buried normally and reverently. Hutton also casts doubt on the usual verdict on Lindow Man: the strangling cord may have been a necklace, the cut throat later accidental damage by peat cutters.

Hutton accords the same careful treatment to the Celtic deities of Toutatis (familiar from Asterix cartoons), the horned god Cernunnos (connected with Herne the Hunter, who is mentioned in The Merry Wives of Windsor and reimagined in Susan Cooper’s children’s fiction), and even Epona the horse goddess, often thought to lie behind the horse-dominated stories of Rhiannon in the Welsh Mabinogion. Britain is notably lacking in evidence for the cult of Epona that was widespread elsewhere: there are two dedications in northern forts, perhaps from Roman cavalry regiments, four doubtful images. There is even less British evidence for Cernunnos.

Discard all the favourite beliefs of the last century and a half, and one may wonder what is left. There are the permanent marks on the landscape – barrows, henges, the tallest prehistoric mound in Europe at Silbury Hill, hill forts everywhere, nearly four thousand of them – and constant new discoveries, many with the power to overturn previously accepted theory. In 2010 a Bronze Age ship, around three thousand years old, was found in Salcombe Bay in Devon, reinforcing the familiar view of Britain as a centre for trade in copper and tin, the essential materials for bronze. But this Bronze Age freedom of movement cast doubt on the whole concept of Celticity, in which ‘the Celts’, ancient and modern, were seen as an ethnically distinct group also marked off by art, language and even temperament. This has remained a powerful force even in modern politics. But what Hutton calls the ‘new model of ancient Celticity’, introduced in 2010 by John Koch and Barry Cunliffe in Celtic from the West, sees the spread of Celtic languages as a consequence of the existence of an Atlantic trade route rather than ‘waves of invasion’.

Trade doesn’t necessarily bring peace. Slave shackles have been found at Llyn Cerrig Bach in Anglesey; hundreds of arrowheads often cluster round hill fort gateways; there are signs of burned buildings and stockades, and skeletons with battle wounds, especially in the heavily populated south and south-west of England. Hutton points out also that the past was just as subject as the present to climate change and to problems caused by technological advance. One effect of the developing use of iron was a collapse in seaborne trade: one big advantage of iron is that it is found very widely and doesn’t need to be combined with anything to be used. Climate change in the Bronze and Iron Ages was far more dramatic than anything we have recently seen: marked cooling for a thousand years from 1800 bc, then a long recovery. Much further back in the past, but not so far back that humans weren’t present to be affected, sea levels rose to drown what’s known as Doggerland, create the North Sea and cut off Britain and Ireland from the European continent and each other.

It’s not surprising, then, that we can see evidence of massive changes of behaviour: long barrows giving way to stone circles, circles and walkways in their turn slighted or abandoned. In each case what beliefs were being rejected, and what came in their place, are unknown. All we can say is that there may have been as many as five different ages of prehistoric paganism, signalled by different kinds of archaeological remains.

There are things, though, that persist. Folk superstition isn’t the same as organised religion, but the practices associated with it could be called ‘pagan’ in its original sense: what happens in the pagus, the countryside, ‘out in the sticks’. Such folk superstitions have hung on through centuries of Christianity, a religion until recently totally intolerant of competitors. Builders continued to put ‘witch bottles’ in the walls of houses, as well as carved shoes and dried cats. More than a hundred cats have been recorded in buildings from the last two or three centuries, and many more no doubt were thrown away without comment by demolition men. In 1840 the navvies building road bridges over the new railway between Manchester and Crewe put carvings, some of them very similar to old cave markings, on the parts of the bridges that took the most strain. It’s a pity that no one asked them why, but possibly they would have said no more than ‘for luck’.

Stranger still, between 2001 and 2008 some 35 pits in Cornwall were excavated and found to contain eggs, claws, fingernails, pebbles, human hair and parts of iron cauldrons. Each pit had been lined with a swan pelt. Digging the pits must have involved a good deal of visible effort, which might well have been dangerous, as the pelts have been dated to the time of Oliver Cromwell, when any such practice was certain to be understood as witchcraft or heresy and severely punished. The leader of the excavation believes that this cult has continued in secret to the present day. It seems to have been a ceremonial practice, not a religion or an organised system of mythology.

Attempts to understand what the pagans believed, whether focusing on solar worship, ancestor worship or the Moon Goddess, tell us much more about the theorists than their data. Yet Hutton argues strongly that this diversity, and this incomprehensibility, shouldn’t be seen as intolerably frustrating. ‘Where the past is concerned,’ he concludes, ‘what is open-ended, subjective, multivalent and individual can be as valuable as that which is fixed and certain.’ Many will be glad to hear it. No documentary arguments will crush local faith in the phallic Chalk Giant of Cerne (an area with a notably high level of human fertility). And even if belief in Mabon son of Madron, Divine Son of Divine Mother, doesn’t find confirmation from a ‘single ancient inscription’, the Mabon Stane still stands by the Solway shore. We remain at liberty to construct our own fictions from the facts.

It may​ nevertheless be a relief to turn from nameless skeletons to Max Adams’s study of King Oswald, also Saint Oswald, king of Northumbria from 634 to 642 ce. It’s unclear why he was selected as the focus for Adams’s attention. There were many other kings in the north in the seventh century, and many other major heroes in Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People, completed about 731. Obvious contenders include Oswald’s brother and successor Oswiu, who ruled for 28 years, compared with Oswald’s eight, and convened the Synod of Whitby, which confirmed the Roman Church’s dominance over its Celtic rivals. At the end of his reign – and this really was an achievement in the seventh century – he died in his bed. Oswald’s predecessor was King Edwin, who also reigned for considerably longer than Oswald (approximately 616-33), and was the main protagonist in Bede’s famous story about the king and his followers’ conversion to Christianity: Edwin’s pagan high priest admitted that serving the gods had brought him little benefit; a more philosophical thane observed that the life of man was like a sparrow flying through the brightly lit hall and out into the dark again, so that any religion which offered more hope deserved to be followed.

Why, then, choose Oswald? Adams writes that he was ‘famously generous, brilliant in battle, a fighter against all odds and winner of Christian glory in death against a great enemy … the first quintessential English hero’. The last claim is bound to be taken with at least a pinch of salt. But in the process of making it Adams gives a lively account of what was going on in the north of Britain during the turbulent seventh century. Much of it reads like a soap opera: wives poisoning husbands, cousins and foster brothers fighting to the death, uncles doing away with nephews, all further contorted by the royal habit of ‘serial monogamy’, a process guaranteed to provide ambitious stepmothers and contentious half-brothers ad libitum.

Perhaps the first point one needs to grasp – well known to scholars but rather contradictory to modern national myths – is that while Christian Celtic-speakers and pagan English-speakers were certainly prepared to fight each other, they were just as ready to fight among themselves. The two Anglian kingdoms in the north-east were Bernicia, north of the Tees, and Deira to the south. One of Oswald’s achievements was to unify them, though not securely and not for long. But these two kingdoms confronted not only hostile English Mercians, ‘the men of the Mark’, but also the British kingdoms of Elmet in the Pennines, Rheged round the Solway, Gododdin in central Scotland, and Strathclyde – the kingdom that lasted the longest – on the west coast. The inhabitants of these four all spoke languages ancestral to Welsh, or related to it. Further south were Gwynedd and Powys in Wales, and to the north was Dál Riata, whose people spoke a Celtic language ancestral to Gaelic, as well as the still mysterious Grampian Picts. Any one of these dozen or so polities might decide to declare war on, or ally with, any of the others. Ethnic rivalry and religious antipathy came well below dynastic rivalry or opportunism as political motives.

Oswald grew up speaking Irish (Scots and Irish Gaelic not yet being distinct) and came under the influence of Saint Columba’s foundation on Iona, where he was probably baptised. His career began when, as a 12-year-old, in about the year 616, he was hustled off with his younger brother Oswiu to shelter at the court of King Eochaid Buide of Dál Riata, at the royal fortress of Dunadd in Kintyre. Their father, Æthelfrith, known to the British as Flesaur the Twister, and infamous for his alleged massacre of a thousand praying monks at the Battle of Chester, had been killed by Edwin, the current king. Edwin was the hereditary though exiled king of Deira and had ambitions to take over Bernicia, while Æthelfrith had been king of Bernicia and taken over Deira. Æthelfrith had done his best to have Edwin assassinated, so it must have seemed overwhelmingly likely that Edwin, saint though he would become, would return the favour and kill Æthelfrith’s young sons (who were also his nephews). There is no evidence he tried it, however.

Oswald seems to have learned to fight in battles in Ireland and Argyll. One remarkable entry in an Irish annal records a severe defeat for Dál Riata in Ireland in 628, where one of the casualties was ‘Oisiricc mac Albruit rigdomna Saxan’: Osric son of Ælfred the Saxon atheling. Osric was probably the son of Æthelfrith’s brother Ælfred and so Oswald’s cousin. Adams thinks that Oswald was present when his cousin fell, and that he acquired his nickname Lamnguin (or ‘White-blade’) in these largely unknown Irish campaigns.

Oswald got his chance when King Edwin was killed at Hatfield, by a force made up of followers of Penda, the pagan English king of the Mercians, and Cadwallon, the Christian king of Gwynedd. (Entirely typically, Edwin and Cadwallon were foster brothers, but Edwin had repaid his fostering by attacking Gwynedd by sea.) The winners followed up their victory with a determined ravaging of Northumbria, which ended only when Oswald, returned from exile, and with support from Rheged, Dál Riata and his own Bernicia, defeated and killed Cadwallon at Heavenfield, long thought to be near where the church now stands a few hundred yards north of Hadrian’s Wall. Adams suggests that’s not the right location, and places the battle a few miles away, on the east bank of Devil’s Water, near Corbridge. The results of the battle are more certain. Oswald now had no serious competitors for rule over both Bernicia and Deira. And, allegedly as a result of a vision of Saint Columba the night before the battle, he now supported the introduction of Christianity to Northumbria, using missionaries from Iona rather than those sent by Pope Gregory to Kent more than thirty years before. Bede, the loyal Romanist writing a century later, does his best for Gregory’s emissaries, but they hadn’t been making much headway.

Bishop Aidan, sent out by the Iona community, set about converting people by the example of his own humility and charity. Given a fine horse by Oswiu’s Deiran sub-king Oswine, he gave it away to a beggar; when rebuked by the donor, he asked whether the son of a mare was more precious to him than the son of God. On seeing Oswine’s repentance, Aidan wept: he saw he had met a humble king, and he knew humble kings didn’t live long. Aidan’s mission, settled by Oswald on Lindisfarne, was a long-lasting success. Despite the eventual triumph of the Romanists at Whitby in 664, the Irish-inspired church in Northumbria became a hive of holy men and scholars, notably Saint Cuthbert, and Oswald’s half-Irish nephew King Aldfrith, the first literate king of the Anglo-Saxons.

Most of Bede and Adams’s post-Heavenfield narratives of Oswald centre on his virtuousness and his postmortem miracles. After only eight years of rule, Oswald was killed in battle at Oswestry (‘Oswald’s tree’) in Shropshire, by an alliance this time of Penda and King Cynddylan of Powys. The ‘tree’ referred to in the placename may have been a memorial cross, as suggested by the Welsh Croesoswald, but Adams thinks it was ‘the wooden stake on which his severed head was impaled’. Whichever it was, the stake or cross was rapidly whittled for relics. King Oswiu marched to Oswestry a year later to retrieve his brother’s head and other body parts (notably the right hand, with which he did his deeds of charity and which was blessed by Aidan with the property of incorruption). These were soon distributed to become objects of pilgrimage. Adams notes that there are now five places that claim to have Oswald’s skull; the real skull is probably the one in Durham Cathedral with the relics of Cuthbert, which is distinguished by ‘a gaping three-finger wide slash across the front’. We might well wonder, holiness apart, what Oswald was doing in Oswestry. Probably, he was pursuing the trade of a seventh-century king, which was making war on his enemies. Adams doesn’t mention it, but it is thought that the Anglians captured Edinburgh in 638, in the middle of Oswald’s short reign. He was picking off parts of the weaker British kingdoms, a process continued by his successors.

Adams goes on to tell us what happened next: for Oswiu, who finally dealt with Penda at the battle of the Winwæd in 655; for Cuthbert and Bishop Wilfrid, ‘perhaps the richest man in Europe’ as a result of massive donations of land by Northumbrian kings; and for the Northumbrian Renaissance itself, which produced the Lindisfarne Gospels as well as Bede, who although born in poverty became the most learned man in Europe. By this time we are beginning to get firm dates, and documentary corroboration.

It’s a potentially inspiring story, and Adams tells it well, but it’s still not clear why Oswald is its hero. Adams claims he was the first to ‘envision’ the modern idea of statehood – but admits that he didn’t go as far as Oswiu. Did he preside over an intermingling of ethnic groups? Adams, like most modern historians, is in this area a determined minimiser, arguing that there was never any ‘great physical invasion of Germanic peoples’, just a change of lifestyle among the British population. After all, he says, the Indian subcontinent adopted cricket and the English law code without any population change. One could retort that the inhabitants of the subcontinent still speak Hindi, Urdu, Marathi etc, while the languages of Rheged and Elmet, Gododdin and Strathclyde have vanished almost without trace. Although Adams plays up continuity as much as possible, other historians have shown that the material signs point to a major economic and demographic collapse in the post-Roman centuries in Britain. Not all change is for the better, just as not all conversions are remembered. Adams’s relatively conventional account implies that the arrow of history points inevitably to us. Hutton hints by contrast that many forgotten cultures may have thought the same of themselves.

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.