In the latest issue:

Real Men Go to Tehran

Adam Shatz

What Trump doesn’t know about Iran

Patrick Cockburn

Kaiser Karl V

Thomas Penn

The Hostile Environment

Catherine Hall

Social Mobilities

Adam Swift

Short Cuts: So much for England

Tariq Ali

What the jihadis left behind

Nelly Lahoud

Ray Strachey

Francesca Wade

C.J. Sansom

Malcolm Gaskill

At the British Museum: ‘Troy: Myth and Reality’

James Davidson

Poem: ‘The Lion Tree’

Jamie McKendrick


Jenny Turner

Boys in Motion

Nicholas Penny

‘Trick Mirror’

Lauren Oyler

Diary: What really happened in Yancheng?

Long Ling

BingeingJenny Diski

Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website ( — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.

  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.
Vol. 36 No. 16 · 21 August 2014


Jenny Diski on ‘Orange Is the New Black’

There was a flurry of excitement when the second series of Orange Is the New Black arrived fully formed on Netflix. People set out their binge snacks to binge watch. I was feeling bitter at not having seen True Detective, as everyone had who was either American or hadn’t set their face against giving Rupert Murdoch another sou to get Sky Atlantic, on which most of the things I like to watch are now shown. But I have got Netflix (for all I know owned by Murdoch’s more evil twin), and I’d already watched the first three episodes of OITNB when the original wave of excitement slurped over the sides of the internet. After those three, rather than stopping, I just failed to watch any more. It was amusing, engaging, smart, like the other show written by Jenji Kohan, Weeds, which was also taken up with a pretty white lady who finds herself a making an indecent living out of selling illegal drugs. But OITNB wasn’t compelling enough to make me fire up the Apple TV thing to see the rest of the first series. Yet, the talk got louder: it wasn’t just witty and warm (always a worry), but celebrating the great diversity of American womanhood and all the colours, races and degrees of deprivation and humanity it encompassed. So because I hated being the kid in the playground who is always catching up with the last craze while everyone else is on to the next, I sat myself down to binge watch the rest of series 1 and all of series 2. Late, but not too late to experience the down and dirty of wrecked lives and the loving togetherness of women who couldn’t get away from each other, with the little thrill at its centre of the posh girl with everything being forced to mix it and regularly falling flat on her face.

I finished OITNB because I’d started, but I’ve ended up baffled by the lack of criticism. It’s easy enough to get carried along from episode to episode. The show is a repertory piece, and a masterclass on how to manipulate the viewer with capsule narratives that lead to regular delicious paroxysms of love and hate. Within the walls of the fictional Litchfield Prison there are heroes and villains in multiple storylines and crosscurrents to boo and cheer, but, crucially, because heartwarming is almost always lurking in the wings of any so-called tough US drama, the bad gals, having done their worst, are sooner or later shown to have a gentler, humane side, often brought out by our heroine, Piper, the Wasp, whose fine, blonde hair never seems to suffer from being washed in fetid shit-spewing showers. She is there for us to enjoy watching as she suffers for her privilege, and then as an enabler, with her skills and education, to bring out the kindness in people you might want to hide from under the bed. The Waspy smarts and regular income from home that enable her to buy goodies to placate her foes are there to show us the human underside of the beast. She’s starved by Red, the Russian badass in charge of the kitchen, but ends up sharing a cubicle with her and softening her heart with a soothing homemade remedy for Red’s aching back. Piper makes enemies, but only to show that there is a good side to anyone as long as they come across an educated, privileged white woman, who like Glinda the Good sprinkles her fairy dust over the meanest of the mean. Even the white trash born-again psychotic, Pennsatucky, who gets nearest to killing our heroine, ends up on the wrong end of Piper’s astonishingly murderous fists, and becomes a pussy cat, happy to give her adversary a hug.

This is all fine and uplifting, until you start thinking about the show’s black population. It doesn’t seem possible for a knowing US TV drama to be overtly racist, but it’s impossible not to notice that the only irredeemable characters and spineless bullies are in the African American group. Just two black characters stand out from the mob mentality; the others are seen to succumb to and then run from when it gets dangerous. Sophia, the fireman turned transgender woman, stands above all the dramas, dressing everyone’s hair, serene, courageous, but churning with underlying loss; and the sweetly vulnerable Poussay, working in the library and loving Taystee, pleased to be a friend but not a lover, is uniquely able to resist the murderously maternal drug queen, Vee. Taystee, having been part of Fagin-like Vee’s gang of young people on the outside, goes over to her when she arrives in Danbury, and betrays her friendship with Poussay at the snap of Vee’s fingers. So do all the other African Americans, who, with just a little flattery and a promise of privileges, become her trusty drug runners and muscle. Black Cindy, already shown in flashback to be a bully, becomes Vee’s mocking lieutenant. The nice but easily-led athlete, Janae, just falls in line with the strongest current, as she did on the outside. Saddest of all, Crazy Eyes, an educated but mentally unstable inmate who in the first season falls for Piper and is touching in her hapless love, goes over to Vee with a vengeance, and is soon viciously dealing out beatings to anyone who crosses her mentor. Vee is the wickedest of the wicked, cartoon evil, Vee for very dangerous, using and schmoozing everyone she wants on her side, prepared to kill and maim those who get in her way, until she finally overreaches herself and loses her power. It isn’t that her gang comes good, but that Vee is by now too madly bad for even the gullible to follow. Taystee and the others turn against her with all the self-serving venom they applied in her service. All the other groups – the Latinas, the lesbians, the poor white trash (just the one tiny grumpy Asian lady) – have their dramas and morality tales, but only the African Americans are shown to be arrogant bullies relying on and rejoicing in brute force and fear to maintain their hegemony. I kept telling myself that it couldn’t be as overtly racist as I was seeing, but I couldn’t see how it wasn’t.

So there is half the Western hemisphere cooing over this manipulative soap, almost as cunningly fashioned and seductive as Vee’s plots. It’s today’s Peyton Place, lots of characters to turn to, to favourite, to worry about, all together in one stress-filled environment. If not Peyton Place, then certainly a school drama: the warders might as well be powerful unfair teachers, and there’s even a wicked lady deputy warden skimming the prison funds, for everyone to hate. Poor Bennett, the decent guard with the wooden leg, who falls for inmate Daya and plans to marry her and be a good father to their baby when she gets out, is essentially weak and morally dubious, and at the mercy of the rules and regulations. Inmates are pupils, the uniform is orange or buff instead of blue and green school colours, and, as in any institution, there are inmate rules that the neophyte must learn, initiation rituals, playground gangs, trustees. Tom Brown’s Schooldays brought bang up to date. It’s a prison, it’s a school, it’s a nunnery (has anyone done a convent soap?). It’s women together, menstruating, sharing, manless (mostly), all female humanity showing itself to be essentially decent under the most restrictive of circumstances – apart from the African Americans. It’s soft-centred enough for binge-watching, but there’s lots of viciousness and bullying to jeer and cheer along the way, just like an Angela Brazil story or Audrey Hepburn finding her feet as a postulant nun. Middle-class Piper, the Smith graduate, learns the ropes of the classes below her, and is there on our behalf to put herself, and our image of ourselves, to the test. As if a Smith graduate could fail. I wonder how many black women watch the show. Do they screen it in women’s prisons? It would certainly go down a treat in men’s prisons.

In her original book, Piper Kerman, who becomes Piper Chapman in the series, serves up her stories of crazy characters and the heroine-in-the-wrong-place having to survive, with a substantial helping of information and statistics about the American penal system in general, and particularly with regard to incarcerated women. In the show, some of the characters’ backstories suggest in very broad strokes the social and racial deprivations that have been the lives of the prison population, but mostly the flashbacks are annoying and get in the way of the present-tense vendettas and love stories that we want to push on with. Piper Kerman’s own background made it inevitable that she would write a book about her experience of being an outsider-participant and witness in society’s underbelly. That it would be published, and made into a wildly popular series, was something most of her fellow inmates couldn’t have achieved. But the book doesn’t seem nearly as exploitative as the series. Of course, things have to change to become a TV show. I’m sure they would say that you can’t bang on about wretched life chances and educational sink holes without losing most of your audience (although The Wire managed to do it). The story arc is queen and must move right along. In her acknowledgments, Kerman thanks ‘my husband Larry Smith whose ferociously stubborn love sustains me and without whom I would not have written this book.’ Lucky in life, lucky in love. But any decent scriptwriter would know what has to be done. In the second series, Piper Chapman’s fiancé, Larry Bloom (Smith wasn’t Jewish enough, I suppose), a dreary wimp who it is impossible to imagine any woman sticking with for more than a single date, decides that he can’t tolerate his wife-to-be having a ‘gay for the stay’ affair with the woman, now in the same prison, who got her incarcerated, and Larry is astonished to find that he is, after all, in love with Piper’s best friend, Polly. They go hand in hand on visiting day to ask for Piper’s blessing. Without a lost love and lost best friend, the scriptwriters must have thought, Piper – always the Wasp – would be too thin a character to keep our interest among all those exotics. There’s one episode in which she doesn’t appear at all, and she isn’t missed. So she’s given some extra punishment that real life failed to dish out, a greater existential trial than her fellow inmates, who have nothing much to lose in their lives anyway. The show eviscerates the book of its challenging intentions, and adds the maudlin Piper story to pep up what was clearly written to alert the American public to their broken social welfare and prison system. But who would want to binge on that?

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.