In the latest issue:

Real Men Go to Tehran

Adam Shatz

What Trump doesn’t know about Iran

Patrick Cockburn

Kaiser Karl V

Thomas Penn

The Hostile Environment

Catherine Hall

Social Mobilities

Adam Swift

Short Cuts: So much for England

Tariq Ali

What the jihadis left behind

Nelly Lahoud

Ray Strachey

Francesca Wade

C.J. Sansom

Malcolm Gaskill

At the British Museum: ‘Troy: Myth and Reality’

James Davidson

Poem: ‘The Lion Tree’

Jamie McKendrick

SurrogacyTM

Jenny Turner

Boys in Motion

Nicholas Penny

Jia Tolentino

Lauren Oyler

Diary: What really happened in Yancheng?

Long Ling

Close

Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website (www.lrb.co.uk — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.


  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.
Close

Thinking about the three things I learned yesterday, courtesy of Levine Breaking News – a mysterious right-wing, LA-based, showbiz-obsessed website that sends me, unsolicited, ‘breaking story’ email updates several times a day. The first: Odontophobia is the fear of teeth. Good to know, but surely raises some questions. Whose teeth? What about that lady on the catafalque in the Poe story? Berenice: I think that was her name. Everyone seemed to love her teeth. And what exactly is a catafalque, by the way? I’m an English professor, but I have to admit, I’m not sure. Or was it Ligeia?

And then there’s the philosophical issue: is it possible to be afraid of one’s own teeth? Hard not to conclude that if that were the case, one’s teeth would chatter constantly – out of sheer self-reflexive existential fear and trembling. (Subtext in these opening paragraphs: having inordinate if not Martin Amis-like dental bills of late – on top of all the moving expenses – have decided to come out as auto-odontophobe.) Life really would be simpler without them. Just gum everybody to death. One’s own, one gathers, are going to outlast one. Obviously somebody’s idea of a joke. Hilarious! that some crumbling bone-pegs and a bunch of grotty fillings get to trump the warm, lovely, soft pulsating flesh!

Second new fact: In the average lifetime, a person will walk the equivalent of five times around the equator. Merely flag this one for now: subtly foreshadows, of course, sombre overarching Diary theme. Distract reader with Pooterish footwork. Oh, yes, that eczema on one’s feet – latest horror of middle age – has abated somewhat now. Thank you for asking. Stress-related. I think it’s mostly gone because at last I’m now moved into the new house – albeit into one paint-fume-filled room only; still sleeping on the air mattress. Javier, Raul and jolly crew of mariachi-loving daubers still working away in the others. Yesterday they brought in a tiny television and watched telenovelas all day long while patching and priming. Bathroom as yet unavailable; knowing looks going between them when they see me peeking in wistfully at the window. One has to slink away into tall bush at back of the yard, then somehow freshen up with the garden hose. Reminds me, like so many things, of my sad childhood – one much worse than Sonia Sotomayor’s.

And yes, it’s undeniable: packing up several decades’ worth of precious tat at the old place last month was hugely stressful, a Major Life Passage and all that. One’s pale, vine-withered, all-too-sensitive skin took notice. Nor did Blakey help matters when she said: Well, that’s how it started with my father. (We’re still legally married, btw; the ban on same-sex marriage voted in in the November election did not affect those of us who got married last summer.) B. my junior by 13 years. Which means when I’m 90 she’ll only be 77. Cracks in his heels that wouldn’t heal. Jungle rot. Then he never left his chair again.

Third new fact, speaking of rot: According to suicide statistics, Monday is the favoured day for self-destruction. Today is a Thursday, so does this mean that the strange new backyard in which I’m now sitting and noodling away on my laptop is in fact a simulacrum – some sort of bizarre posthumous reality? One is in Limbo, perhaps, with the Unbaptised Ancients? (That white wrought iron patio furniture – nice but also slightly funereal – might suggest as much.) But wait – isn’t that a barbecue pit over there? Oh, no: it’s far worse; I’ve ended up in – Hah! Just kidding!

Missing Blakey and dogs horribly, though. B.’s in Boston on some complex family business; Wally and Charlie in the kennel in Novato till the furniture comes out of storage and everything gets moved in. One struggles to keep oneself from phoning Gloria – W. and C.’s hirsute but kindly kennel-mistress – to ask yet again how they are doing. If only they could text me. Or maybe leave a little message on my Facebook Wall. Self-destructive thoughts when forced to admit they can’t. Like Susan Boyle, all one wants is to have one’s little life back.

B., thank god, seems fine. Calls frequently from Cambridge on the Crackberry; thinks I’m making an insane fuss about moving five houses up the street. Full of kind spousal forbearance when I tell her we desperately need expensive vintage-salvaged-wood kitchen ‘eco-hutch’ – I’ve just seen it on the Sundance Catalog website – with special digitally temperature-controlled rack for wine bottles. But she’s also taken to reading me bits of The Wisdom of Schopenhauer over the cell phone:

That human life must be some kind of mistake is sufficiently proved by the simple observation that man is a compound of needs which are hard to satisfy; that their satisfaction achieves nothing but a painless condition in which he is only given over to boredom; and that boredom is a direct proof that existence is in itself valueless, for boredom is nothing other than the sensation of the emptiness of existence.

If the immediate and direct purpose of our life is not suffering then our existence is the most ill-adapted to its purpose in the world.

But what about one’s all-time bummer favourite? That each step forward we manage to take is part of ‘an ultimately futile effort to keep ourselves from falling’. Or something to that effect (I’m dredging it up from newly-formed memory-sinkholes). Even I have to admit that the saying applies: my two whopper black eyes have faded, but the sense of frailty I’ve been feeling since I tripped in the garage a month ago and broke my nose (the day before the movers came) has not entirely dissipated. All too suddenly learned exactly what falling flat on one’s face meant.

Schope-a-Dope, the Misanthrope: nailed it as usual. You can walk all you want, dance into the whole stupid business with gusto – step-don’t-fall! step-don’t-fall! step-don’t-fall! – till one day you step and SPLAT!! you do fall. And then, of course, you don’t get up. Chances of such a mishap increasing exponentially, it seems, if you’ve already walked the equivalent of five times round the equator. Knees, if you will, go belly up. So it makes sense to worry. I’ve moved around a lot in my life – three years here, five years there, 15 years in the last place. (Yes, I know it was only five houses away.) Is this the last big move I’ll ever make? Will I be carted out of this particular terminus feet first? Head encased in the bubble wrap and ice?

And when, bloody bodkin, will I have my clothes back? Another day of no underwear. Must take grungy laundry bag to Bev’s again. Hoping single clean pair of jeans don’t fall down on the way there. Was a regular Capability Brown yesterday directing the hauling guys in the backyard – yes, take away that Grecian urn from Home Depot (legacy of previous owners) – but the risk of accidental self-exposure had been great.

For reasons I’ll explain in a moment, the new house is named Princess Diane; or The Princess for short. (Likely – I already see – to morph into La Principessa in Mapp and Lucia moods.) A classic double-decker San Francisco ‘Painted Lady’ – meaning a late 19th-century wooden domicile of cheesy touristic charm (and, some would say, tragical unhipness) combined with innumerable dilapidated surfaces in need of extremely pricey and time-consuming repair. A plummeting global economy seems not to have lowered the local cost of Lincrusta refurbishment.

Royal monicker commemorates a poignant moment in personal and civic history: that solemn evening – the end of the day that followed the death of Princess Di – when along with thousands of other stunned mourners one found oneself on Market Street, dead-marching from the Castro all the way to the British consulate at Market and Montgomery. Stretched out, as far as one could see: a vast, slow-moving throng of Di-worshipping gay guys and gal-guys, tremulous with grief and shock, eyes red from weeping. Some clutched single pink roses, others little tea-lights, gently cupped against the cold San Francisco night air. (Dank and freezing as usual, even in August.)

Two leathermen – severely and without camp, like two centurions – unfurled between them a billowy Union Jack. Stumpy-legged little lesbians moaning softly, wringing fat little fists at the loss of Her Loveliness, emblem of every sexy-confusing, perfectly coiffed Straight Woman one could never have. One found oneself blinking back tears. (Horrid old LRB, I seem to recall, never gave the Gorgeous One’s lamentable demise the respect it demanded.) Heart-rending scenes.

I was with Bev and my old girlfriend, Tiny T., the medieval viol player. Yes, we were very sad – as What Normal Person Wasn’t That Week? (There, callous mouse-pushers of Little Russell Street! – I’ve said it.) But even we had to laugh at the freaky-Frisco scene unfolding when we got down to the consulate. For there, at the microphone on a hastily assembled dais: the irrepressible Reverend Cecil Williams. Yes, the Reverend C. himself: beloved ‘minister, author, social activist’ (according to one of his numerous websites); celebrated ‘Founder and Minister of Liberation of Glide Memorial United Methodist Church of San Francisco’; world-esteemed ‘spokesperson for the poor and marginalised’; clarion-call ‘voice for human rights’ etc and dare one say, Local Blowhard and Publicity Hound of the highest order. Our very own Rev. Al Sharpton, in other words, but with hair less frowsty and vehement.

Back in the late 1970s, Williams was one of an embarrassing number of prominent Bay Area leftie muckety-mucks (Jerry Brown, Angela Davis and the soon-to-be-assassinated Mayor George Moscone and City Supervisor Harvey Milk were others) bedazzled by the ghoulish Reverend Jim Jones, charismatic leader of the San Francisco-based Peoples Temple cult, Elvis-style drug addict, ambisexual pussy-predator, and self-anointed ‘revolutionary socialist’ who in 1978 subsequently persuaded 900 or so of his followers, mostly poor African-Americans, to ‘step to the other side’ by drinking cyanide-laced juice in a mass suicide at Jonestown, the ostensibly utopian colony he founded (and named after himself) in the jungles of Guyana. His the greasy, goading voice from the megaphone: Let’s get gone. Having accomplished this pious job of work – as the older reader may no doubt recall – Jones then blew his own brains out in the swampy afternoon heat. Let’s get gone.

Pre-Jonestown, the Reverend Cecil was pretty tight, I guess, with his fellow man of the cloth; he defended Jones in the press (as did Harvey Milk) when local journalists started getting alarmed by sinister stories coming out of the mysterious enclave in South America. On YouTube you can actually watch a creepy little TV clip from 1976 – shot during a visit to San Francisco by future First Lady Rosalynn Carter, then campaigning on behalf of her husband, Jimmy Carter, who was elected president that year – in which a beaming Rev. Cecil stands shoulder to shoulder with his deranged colleague, both of them warmly applauding Mrs Carter.

At the consulate, unsurprisingly, the Reverend C., now the elder statesman, was in full preening flight. Jonestown forgotten; every man his own amen corner. Yet if appropriately hortatory and grand, he also seemed a bit fuddled. Kept referring to someone he called ‘the Princess Dah-Anne’. Didn’t say it just once either, but repeated it a whole bunch of times; all the way through, in fact, his rambling and apparently spontaneous address to the crowd. Dour suits from the consul’s office looking disconcerted. Polite tugs at the Reverend’s dashiki sleeve – unheeded. Was it possible he didn’t know who she was? Yes, this poor lady – this Princess Dah-Anne – had somehow come a cropper; though how and under what dramatic life-circumstances seemed to have eluded the Reverend. Didn’t he watch television or read Vanity Fair? And what about the equally unfortunate Dodi? All CW seemed to know was that whenever a candle-lit procession of thousands came down Market, it was his duty to grace the occasion with words of spiritual uplift.

The lady’s name stuck in one’s head, for who could forget such a moving scene? Even as the Rev. Cecil reminded us, in all his wonderful holiness, that the Princess Dah-Anne was now eternally at peace, even singing with God’s seraphic choir, the Castro’s legendary Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence – beefy gay guys in nuns’ habits who venerate The Hunky Jesus and turn out in force for every Pride march – were working the increasingly restive crowd: shaking their pop-bead rosaries and warbling rude jests about Charles and Camilla and the tampon. The Reverend seemed unaware of the blaspheming Sisters – though, it’s true, might not have got the jokes even if he had been. A few overwrought misfits were now also shrieking and booing. Local screamers. Rev. Cecil sailed on, eyes transfixed by the television truck that had suddenly arrived. The Sisters wore glittery make-up of some sort that created little sparkles on their skin: the Fairy Scintilla. And despite the sadness everyone felt, it was magical.

Now more than a decade later, hoping my new home, the second Princess, can provide her own kind of solace. Show that laughter through the tears is possible, even though one’s irreversible decline has begun. Might it even be possible, I wonder, to face down the impinging decrepitude – if not exactly with pleasure, then perhaps with a certain spry insouciance? Simply laugh and refuse it – as one might a suspicious-looking package?

Not that one would escape the inevitable blast; but wouldn’t one at least feel a little better during the defenestration? More intact psychologically? Our Princess Diane was built in 1874, after all – survived the catastrophic 1906 fire and earthquake – and I have to say she still looks pretty fabulous for her age. Granted: has had lots of work done. (It goes on even now.) But so what? Never say never. She even went solar a few years ago. Became a full-fledged Zoroastrian. With a topee.

And it’s true, one’s funky little neighbourhood, midway between the Castro and the Mission, still brings its share of joyful daily surprises. A few days ago I saw a tall, thin, white-bearded man with a cane walking down the street and it was Havelock Ellis. I suppose you think Ellis died in 1939. Well, he didn’t. And he’s in great shape, too. Still working on his sexology. Doesn’t worry a hoot about people saying he’s outmoded. Likes living in the States. Still a urolagniac too! Later the same day I saw the Queen Mother, riding a Segway and looking bonny and regal in a sun hat.

James Ensor is also here – though in his case, alas, only in a printed form. I love him! You know, turn-of-the-century Flemish painter of weird Belgian carnival scenes. Big catalogue from current Ensor show at MoMA arrived the other day from Amazon and instantly supplanted IKEA catalogue as favourite glossy picture book of the moment. Fun to see again, of course, all those surreal pre-Lenten revellers. Goofy grinning hyena-people in masks and fake noses. Some wearing cardinal hats; others, clownish Belgian lace bonnets. Grimacing devils with rotting mongrel-teeth. Goggle-eyed crones and monkey-men. Chalky-looking pierrots. Drunken spirochetes. E. coli bacteria with legs.

But the paintings that I hadn’t seen before have been eye-openers. The skeleton ones, for example. Bittersweet vignettes of bone-men and women engaged in banal human activities. Marvellous vanitas titles too. Skeletons Trying to Warm Themselves. (Three of them in top hats and shabby clothes huddled round a wood stove.) Skeleton Examining Chinoiseries. (Elderly seated connoisseur-skeleton in Flaubertian dressing-gown studying silks in cosy library.) Particularly awesome: scabrous-delightful Two Skeletons Fighting Over a Pickled Herring. These two, you feel like you know them. One’s academic colleagues etc, etc. That idiotic hat. Also what it’s like to clamp your jaws together that way. Loosening bottlecaps with your teeth is no doubt a bad idea, but sometimes it’s the only way to get them off.

James Ensor, ‘Two Skeletons Fighting Over a Pickled Herring’ (1891)

Not that we don’t have skeletons of our own here in the New World. You need only go a few blocks down to the Mission (still overwhelmingly Hispanic) to encounter tons of jolly-slash-gruesome Day of the Dead imagery. Skeletons in sombreros playing guitars or taking baths; dancing, flirting, giving one another haircuts at the barber’s shop. They’re everywhere in fact – on posters and T-shirts and taquería signs, even in the form of miniature papier-mâché figures in store windows. All entertaining enough in a way, of course. Posada and Manilla, the two Mexican master-engravers who gave the fine old Día de los Muertos imagery its modern graphic form in the late 19th century, were no doubt astute if raffish critics of the human scene. Daumier-like. But maybe I’ve just got jaded by too many calaveras wearing Pancho Villa hats. They’ve ceased to deliver any jokey-macabre hit. Like the omnipresent graffiti and now-fading OBEY stickers on telephone poles – local boy Shepard Fairey has gone on to better things since his big-deal HOPE poster for the Obama campaign – they’ve become a visual cliché for me, part of the usual SF street décor. I barely notice them.

With Ensor: just the opposite. It’s partly the weird contrast between the warm fleshiness of the paint – all that luscious pinky-yellowy-rosy impasto – and the arid, humiliating subject matter that delivers said galvanic shock. Despite having lost their corporeal cushioning, E.’s squelettes still have needs and emotions and (no doubt louche) predilections. Mad hopes and visionary gleams. They’re dreamers of a sort – as full of psychology as Sargent’s Madame X. Just like us, in other words. So it all goes on. You can bet on it: were these the skeletons of today, instead of those of a century ago, we’d see some of them loafing around in coffee shops with their laptops, trying to write screenplays.

But I also love the portraits. Myself in 1960 – Ensor’s risible depiction of himself in cravat and elegant suit with a skull-head in place of a face? Edgier than Hirst ever was. My Aunt Asleep and Dreaming of Monsters awfully good too; you can see the demons. I blush to mention the several nice, never-before-exhibited portraits of myself – Rotund Lady Packing Up Book Boxes; T.C. Trying to Find Black & Decker Drill; Would-Be Butch Thing Installing New Toilet Seat – but there they are. (Ditto that pellucid little still life with the lightbulbs and new extension cords I got at Target last week.) It’s flattering to be painted – even in transit – by a great artist.

And maybe there’s a lesson in it all. The Turneresque Adam and Eve Expelled from Paradise (1887) may be my new favourite among his works. No skulls or skeletons in this one: there weren’t any, you’ll recall, before the Fall. Just a big orangey-yellow swirly blob in the sky (God) with several spidery admonishing tentacle-things. God seems to be pointing down with one of them at Adam and Eve – two absurd little naked figures running off in the bottom right-hand corner.

The cartoon rendering of our First Parents is exactly what I love about it. They’re so Damn the Torpedos, Full Speed Ahead. No foot-dragging or moping around together, à la Cranach, under the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, waiting to see if God might change His mind. No sad ambling off like Milton’s Adam and Eve –

The World was all before them, where to choose
Thir place of rest, and Providence thir guide:
They hand in hand with wandring steps and slow,-
Through EDEN took thir solitarie way.

(And needless to say: no Just a minute, Adam, I have to have a twinkle.) On the contrary, Ensor’s A. and E. are hauling ass! Eve slightly ahead, stealing a look back on the fly to make sure guilty hubby is burning rubber too. Eeek! Eeek! Sweetie, hurr-eeee! He’s right behind us!

Granted, the two of them are just starting out on the five-times-around-the-Equator business. They will undoubtedly have to slow down later. Yet to come: the jungle rot, the dental problems, the predations. Arthur Schopenhauer – ne’er-do-well great-great-grandchild, 84,538 generations on – not yet a blot on the landscape, but will be.

But in the meantime – in the Here and Now – it’s inspiring just to see them move – and so beautifully. Blasting it like a pair of sprinters off the blocks. You end up feeling good for them, paradoxically exhilarated. You know it’s hit them; they’ve suddenly grasped what it is they have to do. Namely: make a new home, in a new place. Before the gig is up.

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.