In the latest issue:

Short Cuts

Jonathan Parry

Real Men Go to Tehran

Adam Shatz

What Trump doesn’t know about Iran

Patrick Cockburn

Kaiser Karl V

Thomas Penn

The Hostile Environment

Catherine Hall

Social Mobilities

Adam Swift

Short Cuts: So much for England

Tariq Ali

What the jihadis left behind

Nelly Lahoud

Ray Strachey

Francesca Wade

C.J. Sansom

Malcolm Gaskill

At the British Museum: ‘Troy: Myth and Reality’

James Davidson

Poem: ‘The Lion Tree’

Jamie McKendrick

SurrogacyTM

Jenny Turner

Boys in Motion

Nicholas Penny

Jia Tolentino

Lauren Oyler

Diary: What really happened in Yancheng?

Long Ling

Purgatory be damnedDiarmaid MacCulloch
Close

Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website (www.lrb.co.uk — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.


  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.
Close
The Last Office: 1539 and the Dissolution of a Monastery 
by Geoffrey Moorhouse.
Weidenfeld, 283 pp., £25, March 2008, 978 0 297 85089 2
Show More
Show More

The focus of Geoffrey Moorhouse’s book is a great church with one of the most recognisable profiles in Europe: Durham Cathedral. The ‘last office’ – ‘office’ in its specialised meaning of a communal act of worship – was the last sung service of the Benedictine monks, which closed their life at Durham in the time of Henry VIII, on 31 December 1539. This is where Moorhouse starts, in a study of Durham that is more than just a study of Durham, and which is enriched by his usual stylish prose and eye for detail. The book would be a good place to begin if one wanted to understand the life of medieval English Benedictines and the brilliant bureaucratic and political skills that destroyed their world in the 1530s.

That New Year’s Eve was an end, but also a beginning, because Henry was planning something new for the vast Romanesque church on the loop of the River Wear. The cathedral was now his ‘New Foundation’, a freshly founded corporation of dean, prebendaries and ancillary staff created out of the cathedral priory in 1540; but it also remained the ancient church, with its penumbra of monastery buildings, complete enough to lend themselves for a scene or two in Harry Potter movies. Durham houses the tomb of early medieval Europe’s greatest historian, Bede, and that of another Anglo-Saxon monk, Cuthbert, probably a more effective bishop of Durham in death than in life. Cuthbert was also the name of the 16th-century bishop who did his best to steer the cathedral through the early Reformation: the thoughtfully traditionalist theologian and mathematical writer Cuthbert Tunstall (‘Dreaming Durham’, they called him at the time). It is through the prism of Durham, with its generous archive surviving from the Reformation and long before, that Moorhouse surveys Henry’s wider enterprise, which left England after 1540 with just one ghost of a monastery, out of around eight hundred corporate foundations standing in England and Wales eight years before. The story has often been told, but such an astonishing act of bureaucratic destruction bears revisiting, and there is no better vantage-point than the high peninsula above the Wear, looking south towards the sealing-wax and counting-houses of Westminster.

One of the oddities of the medieval Church in England was that more than half its cathedrals doubled as monasteries. This was very unusual elsewhere in Latin Catholic Europe, and occurred only in places with some English influence; the peculiarity dated from a reforming mood among kings and bishops in Anglo-Saxon times, when monasteries seemed the guarantors of best practice in the Church. The bishop was the nominal abbot of such a cathedral, even if he was not actually a monk: the real head, equivalent of a dean or provost in non-monastic cathedrals, was the prior, and so these exceptionally stately monastic houses were called ‘cathedral priories’. Henry VIII dissolved them all, but then refounded them all apart from Coventry, a spare cathedral in the diocese of Coventry and Lichfield which was demolished, and Bath Cathedral Priory, a nominal cathedral in Bath and Wells, which looked more like, and became, a large parish church. Henry even elevated some former monasteries to be cathedrals for the first time: Westminster Abbey, Gloucester, Peterborough, Oxford, Bristol, Chester.

This was the most substantial change to the Church of England’s structure in the whole Reformation. Of the older cathedral priories, Durham was the most spectacular; its splendour signalled its bishop’s unique status in England as a prince-bishop like those in the Holy Roman Empire, with six gunners included among the episcopal staff in the 1530s. There cannot have been many churches in Christendom possessing a seven-branched candlestick 38 feet high, its paschal candle rearing up another 30 feet; not many cathedrals, either, which excluded women except in a small space at the west marked off by a marble line in the floor. Durham Priory ran its own college for monks in Oxford – now disguised as Trinity College. The monks in Durham did well for themselves; in their huge dormitory, they each had a little bedroom compartment, and for about eight weeks of the year, at four liturgical intervals, they decamped from these cosy quarters to an abbey manor-house sited in pleasant water-meadows to enjoy ludi, or games, sustained by a distinctly unmonastic diet – lamb, dates, rice, figs, salmon.

One might forgive Protestants in the Reformation for thinking that it was all a bit much – St Benedict himself might have agreed. But Henry VIII was not a Protestant. That is not necessarily confusing, because monarchs in mainland Europe who did not break with the pope as Henry did still closed down monasteries or confiscated Church lands – the most eminent was the Holy Roman Emperor. Indeed, Cardinal Wolsey, the pope’s representative in England, had dissolved a number of monasteries in the 1520s to produce a de luxe school and even more de luxe university college: the difference was that this round of closures was more or less a redistribution within the Church’s system, unlike Henry’s secular grabbing of monastic lands and property. What is confusing about the dissolutions of the 1530s is the crabwise way in which England’s monasteries were attacked: Henry even founded two new houses in 1537 (one for monks, one for nuns) to pray for his soul and that of his wife Jane Seymour, but within two years he decided that he had enough prayers elsewhere, and dissolved them too. The problem for monasteries was that many devout Catholic Christians took their cue from the failed monk Erasmus, whose reaction to his failure was to condemn the monastic life as useless. One of Henry’s leading courtiers and fixers was Thomas Howard, Duke of Norfolk, and he was up to his neck in dissolving monasteries, while being one of the crustiest traditionalists among the peerage. Such men could view what was happening as a structural adjustment in Church and Commonwealth, with the proceeds from dissolution giving the king money to do what good English kings were supposed to do, fight France. Equally, they might applaud the idea of returning lands to laypeople, who might find better uses for them after centuries in the dead hand of the Church.

Protestants (or evangelicals, as they were generally known in the 1530s) might accept such propositions, but they had different priorities: they despised the late medieval industry of prayer for the dead, and monasteries were above all prayer factories. So when, in 1536, Bishop Hugh Latimer wrote to Henry VIII just after the passage of a Parliamentary act dissolving smaller monasteries, he made a sharp political point, although with an inexact grasp of Church history: ‘The founding of monasteries argued purgatory to be; so the putting of them down argueth it not to be . . . Now it seemeth not convenient the Act of Parliament to preach one thing, and the pulpit another clean contrary.’ Thomas Cranmer too wanted purgatory cut down to size, and he was delighted to see monks dispersed, especially those at his own cathedral at Canterbury, but he was remarkably restrained in his personal pickings from the dissolutions.

Not so the king’s chief minister throughout the whole process, Thomas Cromwell, who, even aside from landed estates, did very well out of the anxiety of monks and nuns to keep him sweet: nuns’ cooking, game, money were all very acceptable. Yet, discreetly, Cromwell was an evangelical in a fairly radical mode, and he shared Cranmer’s relish in seeing the monasteries go; he also used one of his most reliable leading assistants (who was both a bishop and an ex-friar) to close all the friaries in 1538, removing at a stroke a host of mainly conservative pulpits. Closing monasteries may have been Cromwell’s downfall, because almost the last to go in 1540 (even later than Durham) was Thetford Cluniac Priory in Norfolk, mausoleum for the Howard family. It is clear that the Duke of Norfolk was battling to save Thetford and turn it into a secular college of priests to tend his family corpses. But there was no successor institution at the dissolution, and the duke’s realisation that there was nothing in the pipeline may have been the moment at which he decided that Cromwell must go. A month or two later, Norfolk personally ripped the Garter insignia from Cromwell’s clothing when the minister was arrested and sent to his death in the Tower.

It was probably the mix of motives among those involved that enabled Henry to get away with the most audacious act of vandalism in England in centuries. In particular, there was never any official condemnation of monastic life to alienate traditionalists in religion. The first Act of Suppression of 1536 actually praised ‘divers and great solemn monasteries of this realm wherein, thanks be to God, religion is right well kept and observed’, and it explained that to dissolve smaller monasteries would strengthen monastic life. It also contained offers of exemptions for small monasteries with a will to survive and ready cash or a powerful patron, and that must have taken the sting out of Parliamentary opposition. About this time, the king also first experimented with converting a monastic cathedral, Norwich, into a chapter with dean, prebendaries and canons; he made the abbot of St Benet’s Hulme the new bishop of Norwich, and St Benet’s lands became those of the cathedral, while the Crown got the bulk of the old cathedral estates (predictably, larger than those of the new bishop). After this curious transaction, no one ever remembered to dissolve St Benet’s, and to this day the bishop of Norwich remains the abbot of its melancholy ruined gatehouse amid the Broads.

Still, none of Henry’s devices proved enough to stop a great rebellion in the North, the ‘Pilgrimage of Grace for the Commonwealth’, the kernel of which was popular fury at monastic dissolutions. The pilgrims requisitioned Durham Cathedral’s ancient banner of St Cuthbert to perform its usual job of ensuring victory on campaign. Cuthbert delivered the goods (unlike his episcopal namesake, who was hiding out in one of his castles), but the king cheated both saint and pilgrims: having conceded most of the rebels’ demands and even entertained their leader at court over Christmas, Henry played for time until he could provoke them into renewed protest and then exercised military brutality in the North.

The Pilgrimage’s defeat spurred a change of direction in 1537: dissolution first of larger monasteries which had actively encouraged the rebels, with some abbots hanged, and then closure of a random scattering of other houses through much of the realm. Now the surrenders were outside the Act of Parliament and were supposed to be voluntary acts by each monastic community. Soon there was an extra incentive in the shape of pensions for all who co-operated in surrenders; additionally, a significant number of abbots who had not been hanged, drawn and quartered had been won over by being made assistant bishops. There was something of a lull in 1538 while the friaries were put down – no rich financial pickings in these homes of apostolic poverty – but then the king’s urgent need for cash to pay for his new coastal defences against France prompted a final deluge of closures, Durham and the other monastic cathedrals included, during 1539. The last to go was a favoured royal abbey at Waltham Holy Cross, from where the composer Thomas Tallis was forced to set out to find a new career in spring 1540. And still no official statement had said that monasteries were bad things. The preamble to a second Act of Parliament in 1539 merely noted without much comment that there did not seem to be many monasteries around any more (I paraphrase), and that it was therefore important to confirm that the title of former monastic land was the king’s. Because of this lack of official condemnation, it was legally possible to set up new monasteries and nunneries in the 19th century, though Anglican bishops at the time were deeply unenthusiastic about them.

The fact that there were still bishops around to begrudge the refounding of monasteries in Victorian England is an indirect tribute to Henry VIII’s work of remodelling cathedrals and creating some from scratch. If his successor and son Edward VI had lived, they might have suffered the fate of cathedrals in Scotland, and been ruined or turned into parish churches, their bishops eventually dispersed or rendered powerless. But Edward died young and when his half-sister Elizabeth brought back Protestantism in 1558-59, she was not inclined to go even as far as Edward in forcing change. So the Church of England, more by luck than judgment, preserved far more of the old life of secular and monastic cathedrals than any other Protestant Church in Europe. That continuing tradition of beautiful music and ceremonial goes a long way to explaining the oddly Janus-like theological stance of the later Church of England, never quite sure whether to be Catholic or Protestant.

At Durham, a good proportion of monks stayed on as prebendaries and canons, together with the prior as a dean, comfortably ensconced in his old house, now the deanery. Most of them would have welcomed Mary’s restoration of the old Latin rite (though she did not restore the monastic chapter), and during a failed Catholic rebellion in 1569, some of them welcomed back the Mass to the cathedral. But when, as late as 1579, the last prebendary who was an ex-monk resigned, he was married with a family. He had witnessed decades of tension between those who had known the old monastic world at the cathedral and incomers sent by Edward or Elizabeth to be new brooms (or hatchet-wielders or bonfire-stokers). Beginning with Dean Horne under Edward, the career Protestants also brought wives who delighted in taking no notice of the marble line in the cathedral floor.

Two dates seem askew in Moorhouse’s text. First, St Cuthbert’s shrine was not stripped of its jewels at the dissolution of the priory in 1539 but in late 1537 or 1538, when other great monastic shrines were similarly despoiled. This is a matter of some importance, as events were moving very quickly at that point, and the stripping of the shrines marked a moment when much of the power evaporated from the monasteries: to take away their shrines was to take away the reason some of them had been founded, which softened them up for surrender. A slightly later instance of destruction also appears wrongly attributed to Dean Horne (though he smashed plenty in the cathedral and its precincts): the elaborate Corpus Christi canopy stored in the parish church of St Nicholas was destroyed before he arrived in Durham, by roving royal commissioners from London in summer 1547, one of whom jumped up and down on the unfortunate object to destroy it.

It is likely that the present evangelical congregation of St Nicholas would think little more of Corpus Christi canopies than Edward’s commissioners, but to compensate for such losses, there are objects of beauty enough now in Durham Cathedral, witnesses to a continuous tradition of cherishing the fabric from the Restoration of Charles II to the present day. Geoffrey Moorhouse knows this building well and loves it, which makes for an engaging chronicle of how Reformation descended on one of England’s most triumphal houses of God.

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.