In the latest issue:

Real Men Go to Tehran

Adam Shatz

What Trump doesn’t know about Iran

Patrick Cockburn

Kaiser Karl V

Thomas Penn

The Hostile Environment

Catherine Hall

Social Mobilities

Adam Swift

Short Cuts: So much for England

Tariq Ali

What the jihadis left behind

Nelly Lahoud

Ray Strachey

Francesca Wade

C.J. Sansom

Malcolm Gaskill

At the British Museum: ‘Troy: Myth and Reality’

James Davidson

Poem: ‘The Lion Tree’

Jamie McKendrick

SurrogacyTM

Jenny Turner

Boys in Motion

Nicholas Penny

‘Trick Mirror’

Lauren Oyler

Diary: What really happened in Yancheng?

Long Ling

Can you close your eyes without falling over?Hugh Pennington
Close

Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website (www.lrb.co.uk — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.


  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.
Close
Vol. 25 No. 17 · 11 September 2003

Can you close your eyes without falling over?

Hugh Pennington

Pox: Genius, Madness and the Mysteries of Syphilis 
by Deborah Hayden.
Basic Books, 379 pp., £20.99, January 2003, 0 465 02881 0
Show More
Show More

Syphilis and the League of Nations have more in common than you might think. Both were dumped into the dustbin of history in the 1940s: syphilis by penicillin, the League of Nations by the Second World War. But the connection goes further than chronological coincidence. Before the war, the League took a deep and direct interest in syphilis, with its Health Organisation arranging conferences on the laboratory diagnosis of the disease. These were not talking shops. Technical experts met in Copenhagen in 1923 and 1928, and in Montevideo in 1930, to test large numbers of blood samples in the laboratory, to evaluate methods of treatment and to compare their findings with clinical diagnoses.

There were good reasons for the Health Organisation to have acted in this way. At that time, chronic syphilis could be difficult to diagnose, because the damage it did to sufferers’ skin, bones, brain, nerves and blood vessels was very similar to that caused by an enormous variety of other diseases. ‘Know syphilis . . . and all things clinical will be added unto you,’ the great Sir William Osler had said. But it was vital to get things right. Drugs were available, but they were dangerous and expensive. In the untreated, symptoms could disappear quickly, as the organism went to ground, only to re-emerge randomly and unpredictably decades later, to cause madness, paralysis, blindness, attacks of excruciating pain and death.

With the coming of penicillin, syphilis collapsed as a killer; its cause, the bacterium Treponema pallidum, is still exquisitely sensitive to the drug – more so than any other organism. The disease itself survives, however, even in countries like Britain which have effective health systems. In London, most syphilis sufferers are white HIV-positive males between the ages of 25 and 44 who have attended sex-on-premises bars; in the jargon of the GUM (genito-urinary medicine) clinic, a majority are MSM – men who have sex with men.

So, although syphilis is a shadow of its former self, it has not gone away, just like another ‘old’ pathogen, tuberculosis, the decline of which has been reversed since HIV began turning off immune systems and drug-resistant mutants were encouraged by poorly administered therapy. Forgetting about traditional adversaries makes it easier for them to return. Deborah Hayden’s book reminds us of the havoc syphilis wreaked in the pre-penicillin era, and examines its effects on the lives of the famous, on composers, poets and writers: Beethoven, Schubert, Schumann, Baudelaire, Flaubert, Maupassant, Wilde, Nietzsche, Joyce, Karen Blixen, van Gogh. Hayden reminds us, too, that politicians – Hitler, Abraham Lincoln and his wife – can, like anyone else, catch sexually transmitted diseases. Her approach is profitable and her choice of sufferers sensible: many of them left records of their views – and fears – about syphilis and its effects on their thinking, so that her accounts are more than just clinical studies. Inevitably, her case histories have a strong forensic flavour. She has had to arrive at a conclusion about the syphilitic status of her subjects on the basis of incomplete and circumstantial evidence, and under the handicap of denial and concealment; most people do not publicly, or even privately, admit to a syphilitic past.

Pox breaks new ground by casting syphilis – up to a point – as a romantic pathogen, as tuberculosis was long seen to be. Although in reality there was nothing romantic about the suffering endured by a child dying of tuberculous meningitis or paralysed by spinal disease, the notion of a young life being extinguished after a slow decline was once the inspiration of many novels and much poetry. In The White Plague, René and Jean Dubos remark how death from consumption, because ‘it was believed to affect chiefly sensitive natures . . . could be used at will to render the heroine more attractive, to purify her soul through suffering and resignation, to show the cruel workings of an inevitable fate’. Numerous writers died young from it themselves, of course, leading people to ask whether the disease had added to the brilliance of Keats or the Brontës. Were Chopin and Paganini better composers for having had it? For two millennia people believed in the spes phthisica – a feverish stimulation of the intellect among the tuberculous and an unreasonable optimism about their chances of recovery. Nobody believes it any more: the notion that the bacillus has a beneficial effect on intellectual activity was a literary invention. The only way to explain the stimulation of creativity in the terminally ill is that they were often given opiates to lessen their suffering.

For unrelieved pathos, it is hard to beat the 19th-century ‘pillow pictures’ of propped up, terminally ill consumptive girls (they couldn’t lie down because it made them short of breath). The Nasjonalgalleriet in Oslo has some fine examples. Unlike The Scream, they are not surrounded by crowds of tourists, even if one of the best of them, The Sick Child, is also by Munch. As an adolescent, he had witnessed the slow death from tuberculosis of his sister Sophie. When first exhibited in the mid-1880s the painting was too much for bourgeois Norwegians, who condemned it as the work of an anarchist Impressionist. But that was nothing compared to the vituperation directed at Albertine in the Police Doctor’s Waiting Room, painted at much the same time by Munch’s mentor, Christian Krohg, which depicts Oslo prostitutes waiting to be examined for syphilis by a police surgeon. Today it is on show a few steps away from The Scream – Krohg had to hire an empty warehouse to show it – and it remains the closest we are likely to get to a syphilitic ‘pillow painting’.

It was rumoured that Munch had painted one of the figures in Albertine, but there is a more instructive, though indirect, connection between him and syphilis. He met the Bradford-born composer Fritz (later Frederick) Delius in Paris, and they became lifelong friends. Delius had built up strong Norwegian connections after meeting and impressing Grieg in 1887, and ten years later he became notorious there after it was alleged that some incidental music he had written for a play by Gunnar Heiberg was a parody of the Norwegian national anthem. While in Paris, according to Sir Thomas Beecham, he showed a ‘decided preference for low life’, and we can be fairly certain he contracted syphilis there. The Treponema lay low in him until 1910, when he had a severe bilious attack and developed headaches and back pain, severe enough for him to stay in sanatoria in Dresden and Wiesbaden. Over the next decade he developed numbness in his hands and blurred vision, and in the early 1920s his gait became unsteady. In 1925, all this suddenly got worse: by the summer of that year he was blind and couldn’t walk or feed himself; his ability to sense the position of his body in space had gone. He could sit upright only if propped up in a chair with arms, and had excruciating ‘lightning’ pains in his legs. Just before his death, in 1934, he needed morphine injections every four hours. Delius had tabes dorsalis, one of the classic late manifestations of syphilis. Tabes destroys the nerves in and close to the spinal cord that transmit signals from muscles, joints and deep tissues to tell the brain where they are. He was one of the 10 per cent of tabetics in whom the Treponema also destroys the optic nerve, a particular misfortune because, as Osler said, ‘the normal man walks by faith, the tabetic by sight.’ The test for tabes is to see whether the patient falls down if he closes his eyes when standing with his feet together (90 per cent of tabetics are men). The Treponema dealt harshly with Delius, but, helped by Percy Grainger, Philip Heseltine and Eric Fenby, he went on composing. Spes syphilitica, perhaps. In a sense he was lucky: syphilis did not carry him off in his prime.

Consider the 19th-century Scottish surgeon Robert Liston, ‘tall . . . powerful . . . dressed in dark bottle-green coat with velvet collar . . . grey trousers and Wellington boots, thumb stuck in the armhole of his vest . . . chewing a tooth pick’, and famous for conducting the first major operation under anaesthetic in England in December 1846. ‘Now gentlemen, time me,’ he said. Two or three rapid sawings with the amputation knife, three or four more, half a dozen strokes with the saw and the leg was in the sawdust. ‘Twenty-five seconds,’ said the dresser. The blood vessels were tied with the ligatures Liston kept in his buttonhole, and the patient was taken back to bed five minutes after he left it. ‘This Yankee dodge, gentlemen, beats mesmerism hollow.’ Liston was said to be exceedingly, even excessively, fond of all kinds of pleasure. His syphilis caught up with him and killed him almost exactly a year later. It left his nervous system alone but attacked his aorta and weakened its wall, causing a bulge as big as an orange to develop. The aneurysm pressed on his windpipe and eventually leaked: while seeing a patient, he coughed up more than a pint of blood. At the beginning of December, he developed severe shortness of breath and died a week later, of suffocation.

Both Liston and Delius were working productively in the final stages of their disease. For those who developed the commonest kind of late syphilis, dementia paralytica, or general paralysis of the insane (GPI), as it was called for most of its history, this wasn’t possible – its chief effect was to destroy the patient’s mind. Hayden believes that GPI explains much about the careers and deaths of many of those she writes about. Her research is exemplary, and from the evidential point of view her accounts are definitive, but I don’t agree with her interpretation, which is based on the notion that ‘the warning period of general paralysis of the insane can last for years and can be characterised by the wildest euphoria.’ Richly deluded the patients with GPI often were, but their delusions were just that, and it wasn’t long before they were overtaken by dementia and death. The average survival from diagnosis was just over two years; most died within three.

The disease usually went through four stages. The first was called by some specialists the medico-legal period, in the course of which the patient’s personality changed. Depression, tiredness, inattention to detail at work, neglect of family and failures of memory were often combined with a bounding mental energy that encouraged the victim to think up grandiose schemes and go on extravagant spending sprees. Sufferers lost their inhibitions, committed thefts, got drunk in public, were guilty of sexual assaults. Clergymen consorted publicly with prostitutes, doctors indecently exposed themselves. Common symptoms were headaches, temporary paralysis and speech defects.

The second stage was characterised by megalomania, which is what GPI is remembered for today. Ideas of grandeur often became more and more fantastic as the illness progressed. The patient might start by imagining himself a genius, writing a book that would make a fortune, understanding many languages (but not speaking them because he’d lost his teeth) or planning to buy up the entire stock of lottery tickets and so win the prize. Any lingering connection with the real world would then vanish. The patient would be 800 years old, the world’s greatest physician, with 30,000 wives, passing wine instead of urine and stools of solid gold. In the third stage, which began after a year or two, his ideas would become more and more limited and contradictory, reduced eventually to the murmuring of single words, like ‘millions’. The patient could still feed himself, often so greedily that he risked choking. His surroundings were ignored, time meant nothing, and, in the jargon of the asylum, the patient became wet and dirty.

This condition merged into the fourth and final stage, graphically described by Frederick Mott in his account of neurosyphilis in the six-volume System of Syphilis published in 1910: ‘there is nothing more pitiable or degrading than the sight of a number of these wrecks of humanity sitting in a row, their heads on their breasts, grinding the teeth, saliva running out of the angles of the mouth, oblivious to their surroundings, with expressionless faces and cold, livid, immobile hands.’

Such a desperate disease called for desperate remedies. In 1917, Julius Wagner-Jauregg, an Austrian psychiatrist, began to treat GPI by infecting patients with malaria: there was anecdotal evidence that a range of fevers had been associated with remission or recovery from psychiatric illnesses. Malaria worked. It was most beneficial if given during the early stages, and about a third of patients got much better. It killed a few, but on balance saved lives and restored some minds. Wagner-Jauregg received the Nobel Prize in 1927 for this work, but is now forgotten. Both he and Freud were students at the University of Vienna, and they worked together for a short time at the Institute of General and Experimental Pathology there. Wagner-Jauregg tolerated psychoanalysis but, like many since, regarded it as speculative. It was certainly of no value in GPI.

Hayden’s book is a worthy addition to the literature of plague – it’s worth remembering that more than 75,000 people died from GPI in Britain alone during the 20th century – but it’s impossible for one volume to do justice to more than a fraction of the syphilis story. Hayden gives only five pages, for instance, to the Tuskegee scandal, when US Public Health Service syphilologists deliberately withheld treatment from four hundred black sharecroppers and labourers in Macon County, Alabama, between 1932 and 1972. Even though her account is too fair to the doctors (she doesn’t mention the $50 funeral grant, which was a powerful inducement for the impoverished to remain in the study), it can’t hide the racism and the medical arrogance that were an integral part of the research.

Tests for the disease today are much more specific than those laboriously investigated by the League of Nations. The Treponema genome has been sequenced, but that still hasn’t answered questions which were outstanding long before Tuskegee. Why did some untreated syphilitics get GPI, others tabes or aortic aneurysms, while many had no long-term problems at all? What happened during the decade or more that intervened between infection and the onset of these manifestations? Why was the organism so selective in the parts of the nervous system that it attacked? Such questions are relevant not just to conditions that are now historical curiosities: the answers could help us to understand current problems, such as how and why different kinds of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) produce different symptomatologies. But they remain unanswered because they are too difficult for present-day scientific methods and approaches.

The medical history of syphilis is a wonderful illustration of the truth of Pasteur’s aphorism that ‘chance favours the prepared mind.’ The man who in 1905 discovered the Treponema, Fritz Schaudinn, was an expert on protozoal parasites, and he (wrongly) classified it as one. At that time, organic arsenical compounds were being used to treat protozoal infections so they were naturally tried on syphilis. In the first ever application of brute-force organic chemistry to therapeutics, Paul Ehrlich synthesised and tested hundreds of them. His 606th product was dihydroxy-diamino-arsenobenzene: salvarsan. Although toxic, it was often curative. Alexander Fleming was particularly good at administering it and made a great deal of money from treating his rich London patients. Indeed, salvarsan money probably helped him to keep his bacteriologist’s job at St Mary’s Hospital, where he was later to discover penicillin.

Towards the end of her book, Hayden skilfully dissects the many attempts to show that Hitler suffered from syphilis. Her verdict is ‘not proven’. But whether or not he did have it, there can be no doubt that his end was hastened by its defeat at the hands of penicillin. After the drug’s introduction in 1943, the priority destination for the scarce supplies was not soldiers wounded on the battlefield but those wounded in the brothel. Their rapid return to the front line made a massive contribution to Allied military manpower after D-day. Hayden has done a good job of analysing cases of syphilis among the famous; the full story of its impact on ordinary people remains to be told.

Send Letters To:

The Editor
London Review of Books,
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address, and a telephone number.

Letters

Vol. 25 No. 19 · 9 October 2003

Hugh Pennington incorrectly places the US Public Health Service's scandalous Tuskegee syphilis experiments in Macon County, Georgia (LRB, 11 September). The experiments occurred in Macon County, Alabama, where Tuskegee, with its black Tuskegee University and Veterans Administration Hospital, is located.

Clarence White
Atlanta, Georgia

send letters to

The Editor
London Review of Books
28 Little Russell Street
London, WC1A 2HN

letters@lrb.co.uk

Please include name, address and a telephone number

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.