Francis FitzGibbon

Francis FitzGibbon is a KC and a former chair of the Criminal Bar Association.

Short Cuts: Judicial Activism

Francis FitzGibbon, 23 April 2026

How do we want our judges to make their decisions? Robert Jenrick, shadow justice minister for the Tories until his defection to Reform in January, told the Conservative Party Conference last year that ‘judges who blur the line between adjudication and activism can have no place in our justice system.’ Judicial activism is a habitual complaint of those on the right when legal...

Short Cuts: Why Juries Matter

Francis FitzGibbon, 11 September 2025

Juries decide​ the outcome of about 1 per cent of criminal cases in England and Wales, and yet the jury system is permanently under threat. The latest threat comes in Sir Brian Leveson’s Independent Review of the Criminal Courts, which the government commissioned to deal with the ever growing backlog of cases in the Crown Court. Leveson suggests replacing the jury with a judge and two...

Letter

Trial by Media

6 February 2025

Patrick McGuinness quotes from Chris Jefferies’s statement to the Leveson Inquiry (LRB, 6 February). Leveson cited his treatment by newspapers as an instance in which the press had shown itself ‘indifferent to individual privacy and casual in its approach to truth, even when the stories were potentially extremely damaging for the individuals involved’. But what if Jefferies had been put on...

Diary: Why I Resigned

Francis FitzGibbon, 24 October 2024

Theplan to ‘off-shore’ asylum seekers to Rwanda was the last straw. In May 2023, I resigned as a (part-time) immigration judge after twenty years in the job. It was less a matter of conscience, more of recognition that the role had become irrevocably tainted by the politics of asylum. For years, people coming to the UK for respite from horrors in their home countries had faced...

From The Blog
30 January 2024

On one view, a placard in the street in front of a court building, visible to members of the public who may or may not be jurors, could hardly amount to an interference with anything; it might even give useful information – especially if a decision to acquit based on conscience really is a right that jurors have.

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.

Newsletter Preferences