Neve Gordon

Would Meryl Streep, Spike Lee, Tim Robbins or Susan Sarandon be willing to swear an oath of loyalty to the United States and its policies in order to receive public funding for feature films that they star in, direct or produce? In Israel, the far-right Knesset member Michael Ben Ari has proposed a bill that would require entire film crews to pledge allegiance to Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, and to declare loyalty to its laws and symbols, as a condition for receiving public funding. It’s just one of more than ten bills to be discussed during the Knesset’s winter session that several commentators in Ha’aretz have characterised as proto-fascist.

As in most democracies, all new Israeli citizens must declare loyalty to the state and its laws, but the cabinet last month decided to support (22 in favour, 8 against) an amendment to Israel’s citizenship law that would require all newly naturalised citizens to declare loyalty to the Jewish character of the state. In Britain, this would be like requiring Jews, Muslims and atheists who wish to become citizens to declare loyalty not only to the laws of the United Kingdom but also to the Church of England.

The Association for Civil Rights in Israel has warned that this amendment, which will soon become law, is the tip of an iceberg. Some of the bills now going through the Knesset, which have a good chance of being ratified, would make support for an alternative political ideology, such as the idea that Israel should be a democracy for all its citizens, a crime.

A proposed amendment to the existing anti-incitement bill, for instance, stipulates that people who deny Israel’s Jewish character will be arrested. This extension to the penal code, which has already passed its preliminary reading, incriminates a political view. Another bill lays the groundwork for turning down candidates for membership in communal settlements built on public land if they do not concur with the settlement committee's political views or are adherents of a different religion. The point of this is to make it legal to deny Palestinian citizens of Israel access to Jewish villages.

Still another bill that has already passed its first reading stipulates that institutions marking the Palestinian Nakba of 1948 will be denied public funds. This is like denying public funding to schools in the United States that wish to commemorate slavery or to memorialise the crimes perpetrated against Native Americans.

Then there is a bill against people who initiate, promote, or publish material that might serve as grounds for imposing a boycott against Israel. According to this proposed law, which has also passed a preliminary reading, anyone proven guilty of supporting a boycott will be ordered to pay affected parties about $8000 without the plaintiff’s need to demonstrate any damages.

Finally, eight Knesset members are proposing a bill to ban residents of East Jerusalem from operating as tour guides in the city, potentially putting hundreds out of work. The rationale behind this is that Palestinian residents of Jerusalem should not be certified guides because they do not represent Israel's national interest well enough ‘and in an appropriate manner’.

The sudden spate of these bills at this historical juncture is no coincidence. The struggle between the democratic demand that all citizens be treated equally and Zionism’s hyper-nationalist ideal seems to have been determined once and for all: Zionism’s aspiration to promote democratic values is giving way to its nationalist ethos.


  • 2 November 2010 at 5:13pm
    A.J.P. Crown says:
    At least Israelis don't have to declare loyalty to the queen.

    • 5 November 2010 at 3:27pm
      andyboybp says: @ A.J.P. Crown
      Having a queen may lend the perspective of history - a perspective that the Israelis seem to be highly adept at forgetting when it suits their policies and calling on when it can justify them.

  • 8 November 2010 at 9:37pm
    Clif Brown says:
    An excellent summary of the situation in the Knesset. The potential new laws you mention should be proof to all Americans of the value of a Constitution that protects us, in the United States, from such outrageously discriminatory legislation being allowed to stand - because there are no privileged people as the Jews insist they are in Israel. Americans all can be proud that we saw like legislation fall in the face of challenges in the Civil Rights years. Dr. King shamed the nation into acknowledging that the law states the obvious truth - African-Americans are equal in their humanity to whites. So are Palestinians equal in their humanity to Jews. When will Israel admit this fact? Israel and the United States are far from being two peas in a pod when it comes to democracy. We have made progress, they are determined to move resolutely in the wrong direction. The basis of American freedom and respect for human rights cries out to us to support the Palestinians! Instead we fall all over ourselves helping those who oppress them. Hypocrisy, thy name is America.

  • 9 November 2010 at 7:29pm
    Geoff Roberts says:
    Just back from an event in Frankfurt, in which Alfred Grosser spoke about the 9 November 1938 - Pogrom Night in Germany in case you have forgotten. Members of the Jewish community had criticised the choice of Grosser as a speaker because he has - shock horror - criticised Israel policies in Gaza and the West Bank. This, in the eyes of the Jewish community, makes him unfit to comment on the events of November 9, 1938. Grosser has long been a supporter of the principles of enlightenment and human rights, but his critics are going in the same direction as those Knesset deputies, claiming that there are things that you cannot say or write about Israel. Grosser's family is Jewish and it's a rather bizarre situation when he is criticised as aiding antisemitics.