Close

Terms and Conditions

These terms and conditions of use refer to the London Review of Books and the London Review Bookshop website (www.lrb.co.uk — hereafter ‘LRB Website’). These terms and conditions apply to all users of the LRB Website ("you"), including individual subscribers to the print edition of the LRB who wish to take advantage of our free 'subscriber only' access to archived material ("individual users") and users who are authorised to access the LRB Website by subscribing institutions ("institutional users").

Each time you use the LRB Website you signify your acceptance of these terms and conditions. If you do not agree, or are not comfortable with any part of this document, your only remedy is not to use the LRB Website.


  1. By registering for access to the LRB Website and/or entering the LRB Website by whatever route of access, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions currently prevailing.
  2. The London Review of Books ("LRB") reserves the right to change these terms and conditions at any time and you should check for any alterations regularly. Continued usage of the LRB Website subsequent to a change in the terms and conditions constitutes acceptance of the current terms and conditions.
  3. The terms and conditions of any subscription agreements which educational and other institutions have entered into with the LRB apply in addition to these terms and conditions.
  4. You undertake to indemnify the LRB fully for all losses damages and costs incurred as a result of your breaching these terms and conditions.
  5. The information you supply on registration to the LRB Website shall be accurate and complete. You will notify the LRB promptly of any changes of relevant details by emailing the registrar. You will not assist a non-registered person to gain access to the LRB Website by supplying them with your password. In the event that the LRB considers that you have breached the requirements governing registration, that you are in breach of these terms and conditions or that your or your institution's subscription to the LRB lapses, your registration to the LRB Website will be terminated.
  6. Each individual subscriber to the LRB (whether a person or organisation) is entitled to the registration of one person to use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site. This user is an 'individual user'.
  7. The London Review of Books operates a ‘no questions asked’ cancellation policy in accordance with UK legislation. Please contact us to cancel your subscription and receive a full refund for the cost of all unposted issues.
  8. Use of the 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is strictly for the personal use of each individual user who may read the content on the screen, download, store or print single copies for their own personal private non-commercial use only, and is not to be made available to or used by any other person for any purpose.
  9. Each institution which subscribes to the LRB is entitled to grant access to persons to register on and use the 'subscriber only' content on the web site under the terms and conditions of its subscription agreement with the LRB. These users are 'institutional users'.
  10. Each institutional user of the LRB may access and search the LRB database and view its entire contents, and may also reproduce insubstantial extracts from individual articles or other works in the database to which their institution's subscription provides access, including in academic assignments and theses, online and/or in print. All quotations must be credited to the author and the LRB. Institutional users are not permitted to reproduce any entire article or other work, or to make any commercial use of any LRB material (including sale, licensing or publication) without the LRB's prior written permission. Institutions may notify institutional users of any additional or different conditions of use which they have agreed with the LRB.
  11. Users may use any one computer to access the LRB web site 'subscriber only' content at any time, so long as that connection does not allow any other computer, networked or otherwise connected, to access 'subscriber only' content.
  12. The LRB Website and its contents are protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights. You acknowledge that all intellectual property rights including copyright in the LRB Website and its contents belong to or have been licensed to the LRB or are otherwise used by the LRB as permitted by applicable law.
  13. All intellectual property rights in articles, reviews and essays originally published in the print edition of the LRB and subsequently included on the LRB Website belong to or have been licensed to the LRB. This material is made available to you for use as set out in paragraph 8 (if you are an individual user) or paragraph 10 (if you are an institutional user) only. Save for such permitted use, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt such material in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department.
  14. All intellectual property rights in images on the LRB Website are owned by the LRB except where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited. Save for such material taken for permitted use set out above, you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, post, reproduce, translate or adapt LRB’s images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the LRB. To obtain such permission and the terms and conditions applying, contact the Rights and Permissions department. Where another copyright holder is specifically attributed or credited you may not download, store, disseminate, republish, reproduce or translate such images in whole or in part in any form without the prior written permission of the copyright holder. The LRB will not undertake to supply contact details of any attributed or credited copyright holder.
  15. The LRB Website is provided on an 'as is' basis and the LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website will be accessible by any particular browser, operating system or device.
  16. The LRB makes no express or implied representation and gives no warranty of any kind in relation to any content available on the LRB Website including as to the accuracy or reliability of any information either in its articles, essays and reviews or in the letters printed in its letter page or material supplied by third parties. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) arising from the publication of any materials on the LRB Website or incurred as a consequence of using or relying on such materials.
  17. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability of any kind (including liability for any losses, damages or costs) for any legal or other consequences (including infringement of third party rights) of any links made to the LRB Website.
  18. The LRB is not responsible for the content of any material you encounter after leaving the LRB Website site via a link in it or otherwise. The LRB gives no warranty as to the accuracy or reliability of any such material and to the fullest extent permitted by law excludes all liability that may arise in respect of or as a consequence of using or relying on such material.
  19. This site may be used only for lawful purposes and in a manner which does not infringe the rights of, or restrict the use and enjoyment of the site by, any third party. In the event of a chat room, message board, forum and/or news group being set up on the LRB Website, the LRB will not undertake to monitor any material supplied and will give no warranty as to its accuracy, reliability, originality or decency. By posting any material you agree that you are solely responsible for ensuring that it is accurate and not obscene, defamatory, plagiarised or in breach of copyright, confidentiality or any other right of any person, and you undertake to indemnify the LRB against all claims, losses, damages and costs incurred in consequence of your posting of such material. The LRB will reserve the right to remove any such material posted at any time and without notice or explanation. The LRB will reserve the right to disclose the provenance of such material, republish it in any form it deems fit or edit or censor it. The LRB will reserve the right to terminate the registration of any person it considers to abuse access to any chat room, message board, forum or news group provided by the LRB.
  20. Any e-mail services supplied via the LRB Website are subject to these terms and conditions.
  21. You will not knowingly transmit any virus, malware, trojan or other harmful matter to the LRB Website. The LRB gives no warranty that the LRB Website is free from contaminating matter, viruses or other malicious software and to the fullest extent permitted by law disclaims all liability of any kind including liability for any damages, losses or costs resulting from damage to your computer or other property arising from access to the LRB Website, use of it or downloading material from it.
  22. The LRB does not warrant that the use of the LRB Website will be uninterrupted, and disclaims all liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred as a result of access to the LRB Website being interrupted, modified or discontinued.
  23. The LRB Website contains advertisements and promotional links to websites and other resources operated by third parties. While we would never knowingly link to a site which we believed to be trading in bad faith, the LRB makes no express or implied representations or warranties of any kind in respect of any third party websites or resources or their contents, and we take no responsibility for the content, privacy practices, goods or services offered by these websites and resources. The LRB excludes to the fullest extent permitted by law all liability for any damages or losses arising from access to such websites and resources. Any transaction effected with such a third party contacted via the LRB Website are subject to the terms and conditions imposed by the third party involved and the LRB accepts no responsibility or liability resulting from such transactions.
  24. The LRB disclaims liability to the fullest extent permitted by law for any damages, losses or costs incurred for unauthorised access or alterations of transmissions or data by third parties as consequence of visit to the LRB Website.
  25. While 'subscriber only' content on the LRB Website is currently provided free to subscribers to the print edition of the LRB, the LRB reserves the right to impose a charge for access to some or all areas of the LRB Website without notice.
  26. These terms and conditions are governed by and will be interpreted in accordance with English law and any disputes relating to these terms and conditions will be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales.
  27. The various provisions of these terms and conditions are severable and if any provision is held to be invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions.
  28. If these terms and conditions are not accepted in full, use of the LRB Website must be terminated immediately.
Close

Letters

Vol. 38 No. 13 · 30 June 2016

Search by issue:

Volumes of White Noise

The cohort studies discussed by Gavin Francis often confirm what everyone already knows: that (statistically speaking) a person born into disadvantageous circumstances is likely to be disadvantaged through life (LRB, 2 June). The addition of DNA collection and analysis to these studies is a recent phenomenon, which Francis hopes will deliver a deeper understanding of the interplay between genes and environment. I suspect this will prove optimistic. We already know that the genetic contribution to most of the common chronic diseases – including stroke, type-2 diabetes, heart disease, osteoporosis, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease and dementia – is surprisingly small. Genetic studies in this area generate great masses of data and any number of ‘statistically significant’ results. Very often the effect of a particular genetic variation is small, there is no plausible explanation, and when different cohorts are examined the results can’t be reproduced. When genetic thinking is applied to such hard-to-define traits as personality, behaviour, lawlessness and intelligence, the danger is that great volumes of white noise will be generated. Yet, as Jonathan Latham and Allison Wilson have pointed out, politicians, corporations and researchers are all partial to research into genetic determinism: politicians because it reduces their responsibility for ill-health and social disadvantage; corporations because it diverts blame; and researchers because funding for this type of research is relatively easy to obtain.

Tim Cundy
University of Auckland

Don’t blame Nafta (necessarily)

Tony Wood writes that ‘Nafta, the free-trade deal signed by Salinas and Bill Clinton in 1994, blew away much of the Mexican agricultural sector, providing a cheap workforce for the maquiladoras – factories set up in increasing numbers to benefit from new tax breaks’ (LRB, 2 June). The maquiladora sector, which was introduced in the mid-1960s, already had about half a million employees when Nafta was signed in 1994. Since then the number of maquila employees has fluctuated around this figure, mostly in response to upturns and downturns of the US and global economies. The Mexican border region, where most of the maquilas are located, has always had higher average wage rates than the rest of Mexico, and the maquila industry has from the outset attracted labour from villages all over Mexico.

Leslie Sklair
London NW1

Turn off the TV

It is a symptom of something or other that two books on autism should have been reviewed by Daniel Smith in the LRB, and one of them recently in the TLS, too, but not in Nature (LRB, 19 May). I was, I think, the first English paediatrician to make the diagnosis, after reading Leo Kanner’s description of the condition. I have since learned that the clinician has to distinguish diseases sui generis from what Harold Himsworth called syndromes (the common endpoint of often quite different conditions), and from what are best seen as the tail ends of a ‘normal distribution curve’ of characteristics. One can discern within what is now labelled ‘autism’ a distribution curve in which ‘cases’ vary from so-called Asperger’s syndrome, characterised by insensitivity to the normal nuances of social intercourse, to persons unable or unwilling to engage socially at all.

The extent to which autism is the result of genetic factors or environmental stimuli or lack thereof, or an interaction between the two, is difficult if not impossible to determine, as is the extent to which adaptation on the part of parents, teachers and their psychiatric advisers to a susceptible infant may enable a child to make the best of his (most cases are male) talents.

John A. Davis
Cambridge

Bevan’s Friend

Thomas Meaney’s account of the life and work of the communist revolutionary Milovan Djilas failed to mention his friendship with Aneurin Bevan, whom he held in high regard (LRB, 19 May). The values of the Labour Party in the 1950s and 1960s had a significant impact on him. After his release from prison in 1966 he continued to live an active political life. When I visited him at his home in Palmoticeva Street in Belgrade he talked about his visit to the UK and his discussions with Bevan and how much they had influenced his political thinking. The frequent meetings of intellectuals and dissidents in Belgrade, often at his home, led to the formation of a ‘free university’, a network of thinkers who created a space free of ideological and political control by the government. The meetings were brutally interrupted by a police invasion in April 1984, which led to Djilas’s last, short-term arrest.

Miroslav Simic
Milton Keynes

Tall Lady, Eating Sandwiches

When assessing the reliability of Prince Pückler-Muskau I neglected to check my own recollection of The Pickwick Papers (LRB, 16 June). Jingle describes a ‘mother – tall lady, eating sandwiches’, not a man, as the victim of a low arch. Her five children ‘look round – mother’s head off – sandwich in her hand – no mouth to put it in’. He does not mention whether or not the sandwich was in her right hand. Dickens does date Jingle’s meeting with Pickwick to 1827 so it is contemporary with Pückler’s stay in London.

Nicholas Penny
London W9

Hungarian Sausages

The speaker in August Kleinzahler’s poem ‘30 Rue Duluth’ recalls a ‘broken link of kobasc/fetched only lately from Boucherie Hongroise’ (LRB, 2 June). I hate to be pedantic about sausages, but surely he means ‘kolbász’?

Philip Coleman
Trinity College Dublin

Please, Mr Kleinzahler

August Kleinzahler writes that he enjoyed good reviews from Guy Davenport and Christopher Middleton when he sent them some poems in 1977 ‘and on the same day Hanna Schygulla turned up on [his] doorstep with a bottle of Liebfraumilch in hand’ (LRB, 19 May). This is too much and too little information. Please, Mr Kleinzahler, I need to know more. Are you saying that Hanna would have been your first choice of female company to celebrate the occasion – that this was the measure of how happy you were – or was she really in Montreal and happened to drop by?

Linda Gray
Vancouver

I hadn’t heard of Christopher Middleton before I read August Kleinzahler’s wonderful remembrance of him, since we inhabited radically different worlds, but reading between the lines, I realise that Middleton and I must have lived in the same neighbourhood in Austin in the 1980s. The description of seeing the skyline when the leaves were off the trees clinched that.

I’d like to set Kleinzahler straight on a couple of things. The music scene had been in full swing since Hank Williams played his last show at the Skyline Club in December 1952, and it had been a countercultural magnet since the early 1960s, thanks to the availability of cheap Mexican pot and legal peyote at any garden store featuring cacti. That was disrupted when Lyndon Johnson became president and a crackdown started. A number of musicians and artists headed to San Francisco, where they became integral to the music scene and continued the underground comics they’d started on the University of Texas’s humour magazine, the Texas Ranger. They started trickling back in the early 1970s.

And although it’s an expensive restaurant, Jeffrey’s was and is anything but a steakhouse. And it wasn’t serving Rhône wines either. I used to gaze at the menu as I walked my groceries home from the supermarket across the street, but it was far beyond my means. Little did I know that the hippie who ran the healthfood store halfway between there and my house would soon start Whole Foods.

Ed Ward
Austin, Texas

In No Mood for Talking

The recent death of Muhammad Ali throws into even sharper relief Raphael Cormack’s tale of his improbable find, in the storeroom of a Cairo book dealer, of a copy of Kwame Nkrumah’s Africa Must Unite, which Nkrumah had signed and presented to Ali during Ali’s 1964 visit to Ghana (LRB, 19 May). An interesting footnote to Cormack’s yarn can be found in Private Secretary (Female)/Gold Coast, Erica Powell’s account of her time as Nkrumah’s private secretary. According to Cormack, on arriving in Ghana Ali was uncharacteristically quiet. ‘I’m in no mood for talking,’ he said, ‘but when I start talking you’ll have to hold your ears.’ If Ali ever did make good on his promise to let loose in Ghana, it wasn’t during his visit with Nkrumah, who on Powell’s telling left (or kept) the Greatest speechless. ‘Whether it was the shock to him, a black American, of finding himself in a country run by people of his own colour, I do not know, but the fact is that he had literally nothing to say,’ she wrote. ‘There was none of his renowned boisterousness, which I found rather disappointing, but he was so utterly handsome, as was his equally speechless brother who accompanied him, that the sight of him far outweighed all else.’

Michael O. West
Vestal, New York

Under the Shadow of Rhodes

Gaia Servadio appears actually to believe that the statue of Luigi Pirandello in Porto Empedocle is really of Lenin (Letters, 2 June). This mischievous suggestion was first aired by the town’s second literary son Andrea Camilleri, creator of Commissario Montalbano, whose statue stands (or rather leans) nearby. Pirandello is represented wearing his customary bow-tie, a sartorial habit not, so far as I know, favoured by Lenin.

Noel Purdon
Adelaide

What have the railways done for us?

George Muir argues that the key benefit in allowing the state rail companies of Germany, France and the Netherlands to run rail services in the UK is the ‘competitive pressure’ they bring to the bidding process for train operating franchises (Letters, 2 June). The question follows: why are these European countries perfectly able to run fine rail services at home without the help of such ‘pressure’ from abroad?

Guido de Graaff
London SE16

Just to be clear

Robert Potts, in his review of J.H. Prynne’s Poems, implies that the first edition of Prynne’s collected poems was published by Bloodaxe in 1999 (LRB, 2 June). In fact the first edition was published by Fiona Allardyce and myself in 1982, under the imprint Agneau 2. The 320-page volume was reviewed by Elizabeth Cook in the LRB of 16 September 1982. The circumstances surrounding the publication of this true first edition are laid out in full in Jeremy Prynne’s 80th-birthday festschrift, For the Future, edited by Ian Brinton, published by Shearsman just about now.

Anthony Barnett
Lewes, East Sussex

Good Grief!

Ian Jack writes: ‘At around 7 or 8 p.m. every Saturday night …’ (LRB, 2 June). That teeth-grating superfluity – ‘p.m.’ and ‘night’ – is now part and parcel of the flapdoodle of the unworthy heirs of the Observer et al. To discover that it is apparently acceptable to both a writer of the quality of Mr Jack and the editors of the LRB left me as surprised as Mr Astor was to learn that most his staff were ‘in debt’.

Allen Pizzey
Rome

Read anywhere with the London Review of Books app, available now from the App Store for Apple devices, Google Play for Android devices and Amazon for your Kindle Fire.

Sign up to our newsletter

For highlights from the latest issue, our archive and the blog, as well as news, events and exclusive promotions.