« | Home | »

Cameron Vanishes

Tags: |

‘We will introduce a United Kingdom Sovereignty Bill to make it clear that ultimate authority stays in this country, in our Parliament,’ the Conservative Party’s 2010 manifesto said. It was a promise they never kept. Six years later it’s a promise that’s completely obsolete, thanks to the EU referendum, although just now even that ‘ultimate authority’ is in some doubt, as the Supreme Court deliberates on Miller v. The Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. ‘Our approach to foreign affairs is based on a belief in freedom, human rights and democracy,’ the 2010 manifesto also said. ‘We are sceptical about grand utopian schemes to remake the world. We will work patiently with the grain of other societies, but we will always support liberal values.’

How different everything was in the summer of 2010. A month after he became prime minister, David Cameron hosted the celebrations to mark the 70th anniversary of Charles de Gaulle’s radio appeal to Occupied France on 18 June 1940. The French president, Nicolas Sarkozy, had travelled to London; wreaths were laid at the statue of the general on Carlton House Terrace, next to the headquarters of the Free French during the Second World War. Sarkozy and Cameron gave speeches at the Royal Chelsea Hospital, a 17th-century retirement home for old soldiers from Britain’s wars (many of them fought against France). The building was inspired by Louis XIV’s Invalides in Paris. A contingent of French cavalry trotted around a parade ground at the hospital before the two leaders arrived.

What better way for Cameron and Sarkozy to launch an Anglo-French military alliance than by invoking de Gaulle, the right side of history and all its spangles: ‘Seventy years ago, when darkness was creeping across our continent,’ the prime minister began, before telling everyone about his great-uncle, the diplomat Duff Cooper. A few months later, Cameron and Sarkozy signed the Lancaster House treaties, one of whose provisions was for a Combined Joint Expeditionary Force. Despite Brexit, the terms of the treaties ensure that the Anglo-French military alliance will continue until at least 2020.

In no time at all, the new alliance was forming its response to the uprisings on the eastern and southern coasts of the Mediterranean. In September 2011, Cameron and Sarkozy went to Benghazi and Tripoli and wanted everyone to believe it was their victory. It was if they’d taken the 18 June show on the road. ‘Impunity is over,’ Sarkozy declared, though it was the US, not Britain or France, that had destroyed most of Gaddafi’s capability to fight back. Barack Obama said earlier this year that the worst mistake of his presidency was failing to prepare the aftermath of Gaddafi’s fall; one element of that mistake was placing too much faith in Cameron and Sarkozy – ‘the Europeans’, as he called them. Obama told the Atlantic that Cameron had been ‘distracted by a range other things’ (Malcolm Rifkind called Obama’s criticism ‘a bit rich’).

In 2012, Cameron was awarded the Order of Abdulaziz al Saud (an honour he shares with Obama, George W. Bush and Silvio Berlusconi). In 2013 he lost a vote in the Commons to join military action against Bashar Assad; two years later he won a vote for airstrikes against Islamic State in Syria. Shortly before that, he welcomed Egypt’s President Sisi to Downing Street. So much for the commitment to ‘liberal values’.

‘History teaches us that no government can predict the future,’ Cameron wrote in his introduction to the 2015 National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review. ‘We have no way of knowing precisely what course events will take over the next five years: we must expect the unexpected.’ Cameron, trying to save himself, gave in to his political opponents and agreed to a referendum on Britain’s membership of the EU. He did so because he thought he would win, and he lost. One explanation for that loss was fears about immigration, but weren’t those fears stoked by what he did and didn’t do in Libya and Syria?

What a career. Cameron was elected to Parliament in 2001, became leader of the opposition in 2005, prime minister in 2010, won re-election in 2015, and then after 23 June gave up to go back to pheasant shooting in Gloucestershire – no post at Harvard’s Kennedy School for him. The rise to the top was swift, but what other British political leader has so swiftly vanished?

Comments on “Cameron Vanishes”

  1. rae donaldson says:

    One can only hope he stays ‘vanished’.

  2. streetsj says:

    Although he didn’t resign from Parliament after he lost, I think it’s fair to say that John Major vanished post 1997. The question is how long will it take before DC can reappear as an elder statesman.

  3. Toby_angel says:

    Elder Mistakesman, surely?

  4. enfieldian says:

    in British politics, the smarmy upper-class charmer usually wins – e.g. Blair. In our culture, left-wingers are seen as juvenile, conservatives as grown-up and sensible. But did you ever see two people as politically and emotionally unfit for an adult role as our two Eton boys, Cameron and BoJo?

    • John Cowan says:

      Unfortunately, ruling a country is not historically a role for adults.

    • immaculate says:

      If you believe that Blair was “upper class”, you have no notion of the class structure in Britain. And if you believe that the usual winners are “smarmy upper class charmers”, you have no notion of the past 50 years of British political history. Wilson, Heath, Callaghan, Thatcher, Major and Brown may be described in many ways, but smarmy upper class charmer is most certainly not one of them.

  5. Russell Seitz says:

    The” Cameron Vanishes” lede: “Cameron…gave up to go back to pheasant shooting in Gloucestershire – no post at Harvard for him.” makes oner wonder:

    Would anyone ith a Salperton or Hambleden high pheasant stake care to exchange it for a reverse sabbatical here – I’ll even throw in some rough shooting in Chilmark.

  6. manchegauche says:

    David who?

  7. michael bosley says:

    Don’t count your chickens….according to press reports, Cameron may be Theresa May’s choice as a candidate for the role of NATO Secretary General (£200k per year). Another job in which facile PR skills are seen as ample substitute for actual ability (she could equally well nominate Tony Blair).

    In any case, Cameron occupies a social stratum where this kind of log-rolling is the norm. No matter how incompetent, people born (and marrying) into high privilege are never troubled by reality.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Harry Stopes on Trump, #takeaknee and American History: The response to James McClean, a West Brom player from Derry who refuses to wear the poppy on his shirt during October/ November (like the parading of...
    • Thomas Jones on Glen Newey 1961-2017: A message from Glen Newey's family: We are asking for contributions from Glen’s friends, colleagues and students around the world in the hope of ...
    • shosha shuldeiner on The Conventional Mr Hefner: I think the answer to your query as to why has the adjective 'conventional' been attached to Mr. Hefner's description, lies in the the observation of ...
    • Jeremy Bernstein on The Conventional Mr Hefner: I had one encounter with Playboy. I had written a profile of Stanley Kubrick for the New Yorker that centered on chess. I was visiting Oxford and was ...
    • RobotBoy on ‘This Bankrupt Island’: Around five million Puerto Ricans (and those of PR descent) live on the U.S. mainland - more than on the island. There are over 700,000 Puerto Ricans ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement