« | Home | »

Name Calling

Tags: | |

A one-nation Tory

‘You know what people say about you,’ Jeremy Paxman said to Ed Miliband on Thursday. ‘They see you as a North London geek.’

‘Who cares?’ Miliband replied. Then he asked: ‘Who does?’

Paxman dodged the question.

‘I have to be frank, I suppose I am a one-nation Tory, yes,’ Paxman said at the Chalke Valley History Festival shortly after he left the BBC last year. Disraeli, the originator of one-nation Conservatism as well as Britain’s only Jewish prime minister (Miliband would be the second), was born in Bloomsbury and went to school in Walthamstow. What would Paxman have called him?

Comments

  1. Simon Wood says:

    “Mr Disraeli, would I be right in saying that whereas Mr Gladstone is a sanctimonious CEO, you are more of an effete Creative Director?”

  2. Rikkeh says:

    Interesting that neither Disraeli nor Miliband actually practised the Jewish religion while Members of Parliament. Miliband will at least (correct me if I’m wrong, learned LRB crowd) be the first athiest PM if elected (although by no means the first Oxford humanities graduate in his 40s).

    Paxman’s comment begs the question of where One Nation Tories are actually at home today? With Cameron & Co’s divide and rule (both on national and class lines), are Paxo and his ilk more at home with Labour?

    • David Martin says:

      Wikipedia (if not 100% conclusive: “In the mid-1980s [James] Callaghan told an interviewer that he was an atheist.[citation needed]”.

      • Rikkeh says:

        Ironically, the only way we’ll get definitive confirmation from Callaghan on his atheism now is if he turns out to have been wrong.

  3. Joshua K says:

    Let’s not kid ourselves: Paxman is just a straightforward Tory. Throughout his time hosting Newsnight, if any guest made even a mildly left-wing remark he would start rolling his eyes. For me, the low point was a show he hosted at some point in the mid-noughties, with neoliberalism was at its unchallenged zenith, asking ‘whatever happened to ideology’? A dyed-in-the-wool rightwinger to set alongside James Harding, Andrew Neill, Nick Robinson, et al.

    • Alan Benfield says:

      Quite so: for right-wingers, ‘ideology’ is only ever ‘left-wing’. ‘Right-wing ideology’ is to them an oxymoron: right-wing ideas are only ever self-evident and reasonable (however swivel-eyed they might be)

  4. Simon Wood says:

    Answer the question.

    • sol_adelman says:

      But the partiality of our news filters is a much more interesting one.

      For example: How many people know that the BBC’s Director of News and Current Affairs is a fanatical ‘shrink-the-state’ right winger? The answer, of course, is: ‘A lot less than would know if he were a fanatical (or even moderate) leftwinger’.

  5. jeremyjh says:

    In any case, ‘geek’ isn’t quite the derogatory term it used to be. It evokes knowledge and intelligence, both good skills in a potential leader (if they’re actually there).

  6. Simon Wood says:

    Is it not correct to say that some people would say that the answers here are typical of readers of the North London Review of Books – tangential and recessively parenthetical, indeed, not so much fractured as exponentially fractal?


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • kathleen conway on In Squirrel Hill: Poignant article, beautifully written. Thank you. On this election day, we can hope for a change in our nation. Maybe this will be the day that will...
    • Ally on Fool the Discriminator: >It’s just another media bubble, like the nonsense about the >so-called “millennium bug” in the run-up to the year 2000 Never did I r...
    • Bob Beck on Under the Black Sea: I'm no oceanographer, but as I understand it, lower levels of the Black Sea are anoxic because of the nature of its inflows, and because of the way it...
    • semitone on ‘I promise that I will do my best’: I read this post, after a long absence from reading the lrb blog, in my car while my two sons (eight and ten) played strenuous, interesting, complicat...
    • Eli Zaretsky on The Mass Psychology of Trumpism: The Freudian concept of identification is helpful here. Identification is unconscious and is something quite different from imitation. "Willed ignoran...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement
Advertisement