« | Home | »

Extremist Ideas

Tags: | |

The Counterterrorism and Security Bill 2014-15 has all but completed its swift passage into law. Sponsored by Theresa May and Lord Bates of the Home Office, it promises to expand the state’s paranoid reach in predictable ways: new powers to seize passports and bar UK citizens from returning home; a requirement that internet service providers collect data on users; a provision that airlines and rail and shipping companies may have to seek permission from the Home Office to carry certain groups of people.

More novel is the bill’s requirement that schools and universities conduct surveillance on their students. Section 25.1 states that education institutions are among the ‘specified authorities’ – along with councils, prisons, hospitals and police chiefs – that must ‘have due regard to the need to prevent people from being drawn into terrorism’. The Home Office has published guidance notes on how this duty is to be fulfilled. Administrators must conduct ‘risk assessments’ to uncover ‘where and how’ their students might be drawn to extremist ideology, including ‘non-violent extremism’. All staff members should be trained in ways to ‘challenge extremist ideas’, and if they find anyone who appears ‘vulnerable to being drawn into extremism’, refer them to local anti-terrorism panels for ‘support’. It isn’t only students who will get the benefit of these panels; the bill will mean that any member of the public can be referred to them by a specified authority.

In addition, all visiting speakers must be vetted for their anti-extremist credentials at least two weeks in advance, and their lecture notes and slides scrutinised. Maybe this will help procrastinating academics to plan their lectures ahead of time. Or perhaps they will just stop speaking. Lords Macdonald and Pannick have moved an amendment to Section 25 pointing out that, in addition to the duty to fight terrorism, educational institutions ‘shall also have due regard to the maintenance of academic freedom and freedom of expression within the law’.


  1. pdh60 says:

    Nothing wrong with asking rail, airline and ship for their data?

  2. Philip Amos says:

    Ronald Reagan rather wanted to emulate Margaret Thatcher. The trend since Blair first took office has been to emulate whatever the U.S. is up to, and what it is up to is not by any means synonymous with what the President says or wants to do. It was closely watching the States that I got the idea that the term ‘terrorism’ had been recognized by the right-wing as a very useful term indeed. Use your friends in the media, e.g., Fox News, and loopiest politicos to scare the wits out of people with the word, and then you can use it to justify a multitude of injustices. An eight year-old boy who pointed his Baggins ring at his best friend and told him he could take complete of him was suspended from school for making “terrorist threats”. So have we gone from the Twin Towers to kids playing games, and the gist of the matter is that there’s hardly anything in between that can’t be termed ‘terroristic’, and in the States has been. The U.K is following this lead, of course. But I am in no doubt that this is a conscious, utterly cynical use of a real but overblown issue to gather data on and take control of the activities of all private persons. It is the menacing form of Positive Liberty that Isaiah Berlin warned of in his Two Concepts of Liberty, the very same conception of it that led to totalitarianism in Germany and the Soviet Union.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Timothy Rogers on Fifa v. the FBI: What stake the US has in the ongoing tragicomedy of the FiFa World-Cup selection process is unclear. There is still no mass market for the sport in t...
    • Timothy Rogers on One Cubit the More: Yes, the talk (or essay) was a deliberative, thoughtful one. The cubit is used as a quantitative measure to indicate the amount of scientific knowled...
    • AndrewL on One Cubit the More: Thank you for the link, Timothy. I must admit, I had naively assumed it would be a "shoulders of giants" talk too, but it is so much better than that...
    • Timothy Rogers on One Cubit the More: Here is the link to the talk, which was published in the August 1963 issue of Encounter. It is really about intellectual modesty and clarity about ou...
    • AndrewL on One Cubit the More: In case anyone else is looking for the original Bible verse, as I was, I think it is Matthew 6:27: "Which of you by taking thought can add one cubit t...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive