« | Home | »

Lack of Care

Tags: |

The Equality and Human Rights Commission inquiry into ‘older people and human rights in home care’ has found ‘many examples of older people’s human rights being breached, including physical or financial abuse, disregarding their privacy and dignity, failing to support them with eating or drinking, treating them as if they were invisible, and paying little attention to what they want’. The report has been met with predictable outrage. The minister for care services, Paul Burstow, says that ‘this government won’t tolerate poor care’ and has ‘ordered 250 immediate inspections of home care providers’. But they’re pressing ahead with their proposed cuts to the adult social care budget, which will see an 8 per cent reduction in services to over-65s.

I work in home care for a private agency. The job is low status, badly paid (£6.84 an hour; senior carers get £7.19), physically and mentally tiring, involves unsociable and unpredictable hours and unpalatable tasks. I have no formal training or qualifications (a philosophy degree doesn’t count). The managers have no care experience; their backgrounds are in sales and recruitment. The agency ensures that I have a CRB check and yearly training, but its interest in my performance ends there. For the past 18 months I have had daily access to vulnerable, elderly people’s homes and provided intimate personal care for them, yet no one has actually observed me at work. Were I stealing from, neglecting, physically or sexually abusing any of my charges, no one else would know. And if, as I hope, I’m doing a decent job, again no one else knows.

My employer chases its care assistants with letters, phone calls and text messages to make sure our training on food hygiene, infection control and health and safety is up to date. ‘Training’ involves watching a PowerPoint presentation and filling in an internet questionnaire. Such box-ticking exercises have little effect on the standard of care, yet time and money are squandered on them that could be better spent supervising staff at work and carrying out spot-checks. The government’s proposal for voluntary registration for healthcare assistants is window-dressing. Until the system is properly regulated, and until carers are given adequate training, real qualifications, job security, decent pay and the status that comes with those things, nothing is going to change.

Comments on “Lack of Care”

  1. Janel says:

    Dear Madeline

    I have been trawling the Net – page 17 of Google search – to find someone commenting on their own experiences of homecare, rather than the politics and ethics.

    Thank you for your very sane appraisal of the situation. I particularly love the exact to the 1p wage scale, I do remember this as a receiver of homecare, when I used to ask my carers about their wages, and their miniscule rises.

    Myself, I am just starting to blog about personal experiences and practical suggestions for improvements, at survivinghomecare.blogspot.co.uk – would you like to join me there as an author?

    I understand you may well no longer be involved in this sector, but wish you well with your honest observations.

    Janel in Brigton

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • deano on Stoke and Copeland: Neoliberal economic policies were designed to benefit the very richest alone, at the expense of everybody else. This latest justification being put ar...
    • Rikkeh on Stoke and Copeland: Exactly. The elephant curve shows us that neoliberalism has, in economic terms, been fairly benign for the world's poorest 10%, been hugely benefi...
    • suetonius on Stoke and Copeland: A few thoughts. One, the left needs to go back to it's roots. "One Big Union." No more defense of Western privilege. We're all in this together. ...
    • wearytruth on Stoke and Copeland: "Corbyn’s stated mission in leading Labour is to offer a break with the past and create an economy for the many, not the few." That was MY stated...
    • Ouessante on Stoke and Copeland: Stoke: Cons+UKIP 49.1%, Lab 37.1%. Saved only by a split vote. Hardly cause for Lab rejoicing I think. They should be very worried.

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement