« | Home | »

Whose Reviews?

Tags:

From ‘NB’, in tomorrow’s TLS:

Readers who depend on Amazon for reviews of new books might have stumbled on one in response to Molotov’s Magic Lantern by Rachel Polonsky. The Amazon reviewer did not like it at all… The reviewer’s “nickname” is given as “Historian” and also as “orlando-birkbeck”. He or she appears to be something of an authority on Russian subjects, having already posted notices of books on Stalin, Trotsky, and Robert Service’s Comrades (“awful”). Orlando-birkbeck has also tackled The Whisperers: Private life in Stalin’s Russia by Orlando Figes, Professor of History at Birkbeck College, London. This time, orlando-birkbeck was mightily pleased… Some Amazon commenters are under the impression that Orlando Figes and orlando-birkbeck are one and the same… We find these suggestions implausible, and are confident that Professor Figes will tell us they are mistaken.

‘NB’ doesn’t mention that orlando-birkbeck also rubbished Kate Summerscale’s The Suspicions of Mr Whicher: ‘Oh dear, what on earth were the judges thinking when they gave this book the Samuel Johnson Prize?’ By coincidence, one of the books shortlisted for the prize in the year that Summerscale won was The Whisperers by Orlando Figes (‘I hope he writes forever’ – orlando-birkbeck). If you want to read orlando-birkbeck’s reviews for yourself you’ll be disappointed, however, since they’ve now for some mysterious reason been taken down from the site.

Comments on “Whose Reviews?”

  1. outofdate says:

    Sweet though, isn’t it, how they stand by each other. Or not so much by each other as one by the other but emphatically not vice versa. Then again, what do we know (and what wouldn’t we give to know) about what price she extracted for her ‘admission’?

  2. alex says:

    Don’t miss comment no. 2 (by reputed author Tim Tzouliadis) at the bottom of the Independent piece you’ve posted – interesting..

  3. Thomas Jones says:

    The mystery is actually, finally solved, once and for all, here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1268121/Richard-Kay-April-23-2010.html

  4. outofdate says:

    Ah told you so.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • deano on Stoke and Copeland: Neoliberal economic policies were designed to benefit the very richest alone, at the expense of everybody else. This latest justification being put ar...
    • Rikkeh on Stoke and Copeland: Exactly. The elephant curve shows us that neoliberalism has, in economic terms, been fairly benign for the world's poorest 10%, been hugely benefi...
    • suetonius on Stoke and Copeland: A few thoughts. One, the left needs to go back to it's roots. "One Big Union." No more defense of Western privilege. We're all in this together. ...
    • wearytruth on Stoke and Copeland: "Corbyn’s stated mission in leading Labour is to offer a break with the past and create an economy for the many, not the few." That was MY stated...
    • Ouessante on Stoke and Copeland: Stoke: Cons+UKIP 49.1%, Lab 37.1%. Saved only by a split vote. Hardly cause for Lab rejoicing I think. They should be very worried.

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement