« | Home | »

No One’s Friend

Tags: | |

The winning plan for the new US embassy at Nine Elms, South London, was unveiled two days ago. ‘Not inelegant,’ was the cagey reaction of one architectural critic to illustrations of the new building, which has resemblances to a non-turreted Norman keep, a white version of the Kaaba at Mecca, the base of one of the towers of the World Trade Center, the central stack at Yale’s Beineke Library and the Richard Desmond Children’s Eye Centre at Moorfields. Which is to say that it’s a cube with something of a moat and a colonnaded ground floor, and exterior walls that resemble shards of glass.

The old embassy’s neighbours in Mayfair are hedge funds and the shops of Bond Street. The new embassy will have Battersea Power Station and New Covent Garden, as well as the inhabitants of the colossal residential redevelopment of the south bank of the Thames from Wandsworth to Putney. On Bond St, there’s a bronze statue of Churchill and Roosevelt  sitting together on a bench; in Battersea, the Anglo-American alliance is memorialised in St Mary’s church by a stained-glass window to Benedict Arnold, who’s buried in the crypt.

The window was installed to mark the bicentenary of the Declaration of Independence in 1976, and it depicts Arnold as a model Anglo-American. He fought first for George Washington, then for George III. What American would consider the original turncoat a model for anything other than treason? When he came to live in London after the revolutionary wars Arnold was widely despised and then ignored. He was no one’s friend. So far, the plans for the new embassy haven’t won many friends, either.

Comments on “No One’s Friend”

  1. A.J.P. Crown says:

    Does anyone know where you can see the Thom Mayne competition entry?

    These guys better have an astounding proposal for the glass.

  2. Julia Atkins says:

    For those of us who live on the South bank and regularly demonstrate outside the Embassy this is very good news indeed. Tough on North Londoners, but they’ve always had it their way so far. I’ve actually timed a gentle walk from Trafalgar Square to the new site and its about 50 minutes; less if we assemble at the Embankment. It would have been thoughtful if the Embassy had considered a large open space in the front (suitably barbed-wired ofcourse)for demonstrators. Is it too late?

  3. makanaka says:

    That’s odd. I thought the US embassy in Britain was at 10 Downing Street.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Harry Stopes on Trump, #takeaknee and American History: The response to James McClean, a West Brom player from Derry who refuses to wear the poppy on his shirt during October/ November (like the parading of...
    • Thomas Jones on Glen Newey 1961-2017: A message from Glen Newey's family: We are asking for contributions from Glen’s friends, colleagues and students around the world in the hope of ...
    • shosha shuldeiner on The Conventional Mr Hefner: I think the answer to your query as to why has the adjective 'conventional' been attached to Mr. Hefner's description, lies in the the observation of ...
    • Jeremy Bernstein on The Conventional Mr Hefner: I had one encounter with Playboy. I had written a profile of Stanley Kubrick for the New Yorker that centered on chess. I was visiting Oxford and was ...
    • RobotBoy on ‘This Bankrupt Island’: Around five million Puerto Ricans (and those of PR descent) live on the U.S. mainland - more than on the island. There are over 700,000 Puerto Ricans ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement