« | Home | »

Terremoto

Tags: |

I was woken by a text message from my mother: ‘Are you ok news of earthquake.’ I live more than 100km from l’Aquila, and didn’t feel anything at 3.30 this morning – at least, not enough to wake me up. One of the neighbours says she was disturbed by a noise she thought was her husband walking into a door.

The death toll in Abruzzo has now passed 90, and there are more than 50,000 evacuees. Berlusconi cancelled a trip to Moscow to fly over the destruction in a helicopter. The pope said he’s praying for the dead babies. The head of the National Institute of Geophysics and Vulcanology, Enzo Boschi, has pointed the finger at poor building standards. ‘We get upset after every earthquake,’ La Repubblica has reported him as saying, ‘but it’s not part of our culture to build in an adequate manner in seismic zones.’ The INGV has made detailed seismic hazard maps of Italy, as well as indicating the kinds of intervention that could be undertaken to make buildings safer. But according to Boschi no one pays any attention.

As I learned from Susan Elizabeth Hough’s Earthshaking Science: What We Know (and Don’t Know) about Earthquakes, there’s an important difference between hazard and risk: hazard is the probability that an earthquake will affect a given area; risk ‘reflects the exposure of structures, lifelines and populations to existing hazard’. Boschi’s point is that, considering the hazard, the risk in Italy is too high.

When our roof was fixed last year, the engineer had to submit his plans to the provincial seismic planning department. Supposedly it’s now earthquake resistant. Which would be more reassuring if I could be sure the walls were too.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • wearytruth on Stoke and Copeland: "Corbyn’s stated mission in leading Labour is to offer a break with the past and create an economy for the many, not the few." That was MY stated...
    • Ouessante on Stoke and Copeland: Stoke: Cons+UKIP 49.1%, Lab 37.1%. Saved only by a split vote. Hardly cause for Lab rejoicing I think. They should be very worried.
    • streetsj on Stoke and Copeland: As in all votes there are a multitude of reasons why people vote as they do but it seems unlikely that Nuttall's contribution was anything other than ...
    • piffin on Stoke and Copeland: That Labour could beat off Ukip's anti-immigrant challenge in Stoke but lose to the Tories in Copeland suggests the latter result was informed by the ...
    • suetonius on Remembering Seymour Papert: Oh my, flashback inducing. I remember being an undergraduate right when the book came out, physics student at the time. Several of my professors wer...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement