« | Home | »

On ‘Ripper Street’

Tags: | |

My historical centre of gravity, so to speak, is the 1890s, and has involved research into the London Metropolitan Police; so I’ve been a keen watcher of Ripper Street on BBC2, starring Matthew Macfadyen as Inspector Reid, a fictional detective in Whitechapel around then. It takes a strong stomach to watch it; but historically it’s pretty accurate, despite the occasional (unsurprising) anachronism. This week’s episode centred on the Thames Ironworks factory in the East End; and in particular its football team. Thames Ironworks FC was the original name of West Ham United, a.k.a. the Hammers or the Irons. I’ve followed them for decades. On Monday night, we saw them playing, convincingly (i.e. roughly but skilfully), in late-19th-century strip. The plot involves the murder of one of the star players – with a hammer. It also features the Arsenal. But I don’t want to give too much away.

The show touched tangentially on the broader social significance of football at that time: namely, its importance in forging working-class identity. At one point, the team’s trainer shows Reid around the works. It used to be run almost co-operatively, he claims, with the men having an input through their unions. (I’m not sure if that’s historically true, but it makes the writers’ contemporary point.) Now all that is coming to an end. The bosses have taken control away from the men. They’re trying to break the unions, ‘prising the men away from their fellow men’. ‘But this,’ he says, pointing to the players on the field. ‘The football. They can’t take that away from us.’

But in the long run, that’s exactly what ‘they’ have done. The latest stage of the capitalist exploitation of football (or whatever you want to call it) is the recent removal of West Ham United FC from its cultural roots in Thames Ironworks country, against most of its fans’ wishes, to its huge posh new ex-Olympic stadium in Stratford. Did the writers of Ripper Street have that in mind? I haven’t been to the new ground yet, but I’m told that the atmosphere there, in both the ground itself and its environs, is flat by comparison with the old Upton Park. This may have something to do with West Ham’s results so far this season, which are pretty dire.

Comments

  1. Joe Morison says:

    To lower the tone (sorry), I love the men’s fashion – all those loud colours and hypnotic checks; and the hats, not quite Dickensian in their variety but still a joy. As a lifelong Londoner, its aesthetic feels right.

  2. sol_adelman says:

    They’re saying the only thing that now obstructs WH fans’ view of the game is the curvature of the earth.

  3. Jonathan W says:

    Haven’t seen the show. Everything about West Ham’s move to the Olympic Stadium epitomises the arrogance, folly and contempt that is the corporate, shareholder take over zeitgeist of the neoliberal era we have found ourselves in. And for what good? Oh yeah, shareholder value; profit; money! And it’s the blatant disregard for both the heritage of a club and a contempt for the fans – where else they gonna go? they’re West Ham fans! that is as cynical as it is deplorable and depressing. That’s not to mention the cronyism of the tory peer Karen Brady, exploiting the..Olympic legacy? Newham Council? HMRC? life long West Ham fans? Or, all of the above?

    As a famous Arsenal fan once famously said: “Ever had the feeling you’ve been had?”


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • semitone on ‘I promise that I will do my best’: I read this post, after a long absence from reading the lrb blog, in my car while my two sons (eight and ten) played strenuous, interesting, complicat...
    • Eli Zaretsky on The Mass Psychology of Trumpism: The Freudian concept of identification is helpful here. Identification is unconscious and is something quite different from imitation. "Willed ignoran...
    • Jeremy Harding on Who killed Maurice Audin?: Who killed Mehdi Ben Barka in 1965? Good question. One of the best answers came from Stephen Smith, in Le Monde in 2001. Smith is an LRB contributor. ...
    • Eli Zaretsky on The Mass Psychology of Trumpism: yes, excellent point, however, there are different ways to constitute a "volk." Trump's followers constitute a volk, and its basis is not the US "volk...
    • heinz suenker on The Mass Psychology of Trumpism: thanks for the idea to bring adorno in - showing his contemporary relevance. I think what has to be added is his idea about the 'volksgemeinschaft' - ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement
Advertisement