« | Home | »

Get rid of PMQs

Tags:

Ed Miliband has said with not very much reservation that the idea of getting rid of Prime Minister’s Questions is something he ‘might be up for’. He would look into it. As political statements go, that is edging on the emphatic. In the same interview he acknowledged public enervation at shouting matches.

He is dead right. As a sketchwriter I used to watch these encounters, and watched them deteriorate. In Gordon Brown’s time, his sullen people had a slogan, chanted ever and again: ‘No more boom or bust.’ Which, in the light of the outcome of Brown’s devotion to Ayn Rand’s favourite pupil, Alan Greenspan (granted the Freedom of the City of London in 2006), proved a cosmic custard pie too crude for irony.

I minded the chanting almost as much as the economics. ‘Come on the Rovers’ is one thing, rhythmic fiscal projection another. Where’s the dignity? where the wisdom of staying shut-up? I did less than my share of PMQs and tried, if the business of the day could pass in a flickering light as interesting, to stay for that and write the sketch – very quickly, but actually about something.

The general view of the lodge, though, was that this was being done especially for us, knock-about put on for knockers-about. Unfortunately that includes the ones in the chamber. From the leadership’s point of view, it was a pool of dubious light in which to be seen and perform. Thatcher could be iron-sided, Callaghan spurious-paternal, Macmillan a shrewd, not illiberal old gent who knew a thing or two and carried nice crumbs for discerning pigeons. Macmillan was good at it. Major, creditably, wasn’t. And Cameron is awful.

Overall, PMQs diminish the reputation of Parliament. The general contempt for MPs, which so many of them don’t deserve, owes a great deal to the sheer childishness of such overtures to an unattended opera. If you want a fairer and friendlier public, keep the cameras in committee, especially Public Accounts. Get polite. Get detailed. And remember: people are not as interested in party politics as you are.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Harry Stopes on Trump, #takeaknee and American History: The response to James McClean, a West Brom player from Derry who refuses to wear the poppy on his shirt during October/ November (like the parading of...
    • Thomas Jones on Glen Newey 1961-2017: A message from Glen Newey's family: We are asking for contributions from Glen’s friends, colleagues and students around the world in the hope of ...
    • shosha shuldeiner on The Conventional Mr Hefner: I think the answer to your query as to why has the adjective 'conventional' been attached to Mr. Hefner's description, lies in the the observation of ...
    • Jeremy Bernstein on The Conventional Mr Hefner: I had one encounter with Playboy. I had written a profile of Stanley Kubrick for the New Yorker that centered on chess. I was visiting Oxford and was ...
    • RobotBoy on ‘This Bankrupt Island’: Around five million Puerto Ricans (and those of PR descent) live on the U.S. mainland - more than on the island. There are over 700,000 Puerto Ricans ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement