« | Home | »

Shop Your Neighbours

Tags: | |

When the protests that followed Iran’s presidential election in 2009 began to fizzle out, the state-controlled media put photos of the demonstrations online, with the faces of unidentified troublemakers highlighted. Viewers were asked to help identify them and even track them down. If the Iranian authorities are to be believed, arrests were made as a result. 

Today, as the web is being undermined by the rapid dominance of apps for smartphones and tablets, the Iranian police would probably, as the jargon has it, ‘go multiplatform’. That, at any rate, is what their colleagues in the Metropolitan Police have just done: unveiling, ahead of the Olympics, a new app called Facewatch ID.

You enter your postcode, and are shown CCTV images of people committing minor crimes in your area. If you recognise anyone, you can let the police know straightaway using the app. The idea is that, if popular, the app will work as a deterrent while also allowing the general public to share in the burdens – and joys – of policing. 

The police – or the people who provide them with the technology – may be hoping for other, less obvious benefits from the new system, which could help prepare the ground for fully automated facial recognition systems. The old inefficient approach – putting up wanted posters at bus stops; policemen showing photos of suspects to potential witnesses – gradually gives way to a hybrid approach, where the photos are distributed via smartphones, only to be replaced by a fully automated approach, where human intervention becomes unnecessary altogether. This isn’t to say that automation gives perfect results – far from it – but it’s easier for its advocates to make the case for complete automation once a hybrid system is already in place.

Comments on “Shop Your Neighbours”

  1. Phil Edwards says:

    I often think that one of the great untold stories of the last half-century is how policed British society has become.

    In the 1957 film Town on Trial, the abrasive new-broom police inspector tasked with cracking a murder case (John Mills) has a questionnaire delivered door to door, asking the locals to tell the police if they’ve seen anything suspicious. The local police are affronted – you can’t do that, man!; asking British subjects to inform on one another, why, it’s tantamount to Gestapo tactics! This, with a murder unsolved. We’ve come a long, long way.

  2. streetsj says:

    Interesting. Is something more of a threat/invasion of privacy just because its more efficient than the prior way of doing things?
    It strikes me that the Facewatch ID programme is very open to “I’m Spartacus” treatment – or for the less brave “he’s Spartacus”. If they are seeking someone for bad reasons then the ID process could easily be neutered by a flash mis-ID campaign.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • ksh93 on ‘Essentially Bohemian’: When Castro visited US in 1959 and met Vice President Nixon, the latter suggested that Castro's regime would do well to emulate the development model ...
    • denismollison on At Mount Rushmore: PS : Apologies, that link should be http://www.startribune.com/the-real-history-of-mount-rushmore/388715411/
    • denismollison on At Mount Rushmore: I'm surprised that this post doesn't reference Mount Rushmore's history as a monument to european americans' treatment of the indigenous people. It i...
    • alan.hertz@faculty.hult.edu on At Mount Rushmore: I don't think it's just a quibble to point out that Tate didn't go into the sugar business until 1859 -- more than a quarter century after the aboliti...
    • Jeremy Bernstein on Boosting: I just wanted to clarify. When I wrote that tritium was super heavy I meant among hydrogen isotopes. Ordinary hydrogen has one proton in the nucleus, ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement