« | Home | »

Third-Rate Stamps

Tags: | |

By unlucky coincidence, the Royal Mail launched this year’s set of Christmas stamps the day before the Leonardo da Vinci exhibition opened at the National Gallery. On one hand, both versions of The Virgin of the Rocks in the same room; on the other, to ‘celebrate the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible’, Mary looking like one of the Bisto kids, but more inane, with her head wrapped in an ethnically imprecise white cloth, covering her hair but knotted oddly at the back. That’s on the first-class stamp, purporting to illustrate Matthew 1.23 (‘Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son’). The larger version shows a dove, apparently perched on a Windsor chair.

On the second-class stamp, a bulky lilac-clad angel hovers above the sleeping Joseph. The reference is to Matthew 1.21. Biblical scholars may notice that this incident is in fact described in verse 20, but I leave that to them; it’s the aesthetics that bother me. I asked a recent art school graduate, now working in book design, if this was stylish retro of a sort that had passed me by. Apparently not. The 2011 ‘King James Bible’ stamps don’t even have the distinction of harking back to the golden days of Ladybird Books.

Comments

  1. alex says:

    I’m surprised the LRB didn’t discuss the more important issue of whether we should have religion on our stamps. As for the designs I think they are really cool and the above post is just a moan, off-target in more than one place:
    About the verse being wrong – the image could perfectly well represent Matthew 1.21, which continues the direct speech addressed by the angel to Joseph from the previous verse.
    And what kind of criticism is ‘ethnically imprecise’? Many classic representations of the Virgin are also technically subject to that observation but the Christian message is not an ethnic one so it’s about the least relevant thing to say about such an image.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Coldish on Why We Strike: My capacity for sympathy with the concerns of the university staff is tempered by the fact that even after more than 25 years continuous direct part-t...
    • mildly_baffled on Why We Strike: Seems like the financial realities that have raped private sector pension provision in the last decade, are finally catching up with academia - using ...
    • Waseem Yaqoob on Why We Strike: The final salary scheme for university staff was closed in 2011. The USS pension scheme is not funded out of general taxation; it is not a public sect...
    • bidem on Why We Strike: Final salary pension schemes have almost disappeared in the private sector. Basically because they are too expensive. It is inevitable that similar p...
    • Joefarrell on Fischia il vento: The rise of racism and the resurgence of Fascism in Italy is nauseating and worrying, but Italians are justified in complaining that they have had to ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement