« | Home | »

Anterior Fears

Tags: |

The late Philip Gould was a man of conviction, but he personified a fundamental political error: insisting on the fighting the last war during the next. The Labour Party would lose all its radicalism in the 1990s because influential people like Gould were still armed for battle with Arthur Scargill, the Militant Tendency and Michael Foot’s unsuitable overcoat. New Labour moved absurdly far to the right to show that they weren’t like that any more. Partly in consequence, we are picking ourselves up from the debris left by Peter Mandelson’s ‘filthy rich’.

Gould’s fear of the menacing past was personal: he argued fiercely against Ken Livingstone’s running as Labour’s candidate for mayor of London. ‘He still thinks I’m a Soviet agent,’ Livingstone told me in 2004. A generalised fear continues among Labour’s new outs. Miliband’s first mild gestures toward the interests of the not-rich were immediately met with the idiot term ‘Red Ed’. Old-fashioned Blairites still huddle in shivering immobilism.

It was always nonsense. Militant was long since routed, Scargill become chuntering history when the Labour Party under John Smith – thanks in part to his undoctored image, the ERM fiasco and the Tory split – had a rising lead in the polls. After Smith died, Gould, an honest man full of anterior fears, provided doctrine, statistics and respectability for hungry opportunists to do what came naturally.

Comments are closed.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • semitone on ‘I promise that I will do my best’: I read this post, after a long absence from reading the lrb blog, in my car while my two sons (eight and ten) played strenuous, interesting, complicat...
    • Eli Zaretsky on The Mass Psychology of Trumpism: The Freudian concept of identification is helpful here. Identification is unconscious and is something quite different from imitation. "Willed ignoran...
    • Jeremy Harding on Who killed Maurice Audin?: Who killed Mehdi Ben Barka in 1965? Good question. One of the best answers came from Stephen Smith, in Le Monde in 2001. Smith is an LRB contributor. ...
    • Eli Zaretsky on The Mass Psychology of Trumpism: yes, excellent point, however, there are different ways to constitute a "volk." Trump's followers constitute a volk, and its basis is not the US "volk...
    • heinz suenker on The Mass Psychology of Trumpism: thanks for the idea to bring adorno in - showing his contemporary relevance. I think what has to be added is his idea about the 'volksgemeinschaft' - ...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement
Advertisement