« | Home | »

New, Shiny, Control Freak

Tags:

The big news here in New York is that I’ve bought an iPad. I’ve been fooling around with it and enjoying the general awesomeness. My preliminary verdict is a. that it is a beautiful toy, objectively expensive but not dear for what it is, and b. that in a couple of years, say by version 3, the tablet will have replaced the computer for most of us, most of the time. Even this version does most non-keyboard-intensive things more intuitively and more prettily and more conveniently than a laptop. The extra-large touchscreen makes you understand that this kind of interface is the future of computing.

I’m not typing this on my iPad, however. That’s because while loads of software is already available for the device, crucial parts of Apple’s own software isn’t. Or rather, it is only available to customers with a US iTunes account. But my account is registered in the UK. This means that I can buy and run pretty much any of the 150,000 existing Apps, except the ones that Apple makes itself. So I can’t use iBooks, Apple’s new ebook shop, or their word-processing program Pages, until Apple deigns to launch the iPad in the UK, and unlocks access to its already-existing software. This is a gigantic pain in the arse and is exactly the kind of thing which Apple-loathers loathe about the company: the mixture of cool attitudinising and Stalinist obsession with control. There is a workaround, involving starting a new iTunes account and using US iTunes gift-vouchers to buy the software, but that is roughly as convenient as carving on stone tablets.

So, back to the election. If the iPad were a British party leader would it be:

a. Nick Clegg, because it’s new
b. David Cameron, because it’s shiny
c. Gordon Brown, because it displays the symptoms of severe control-freakery?

Answer: d., all of the above.

Comments on “New, Shiny, Control Freak”

  1. Phil says:

    in a couple of years, say by version 3

    I wonder. I haven’t played with an iPad, but I do know that it runs the iPhone OS rather than OS X in any form, and the iPhone OS doesn’t multi-task. Which, when you consider that Windows 3 was offering a kind of multi-tasking in 1991, is a bit of a step backward.

  2. outofdate says:

    There I thought the New Yorker was already doing all the free advertising that needs to be done among the well-furnished minds.

  3. cigar says:

    What’s next? “The 10 Most iPaddish MP’s” or “Nick Klegg is the new iPad”, a là “Black is the new White”. If Lanchester’s iPhone/Blackberry addiction gets any worse, he will start writing his LRB articles in 200 character paragraphs…

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Timothy Rogers on In Philadelphia: The closing sentence of this report is true, and very ominous at that. The critical question then becomes, of the voters who actually turn out in Nov...
    • Charles Turner on England, Secede!: The arguments for brexit were dominated by the alleged need to control immigration. Wouldn't there have to be a serious physical border - a fence - b...
    • Locus on England, Secede!: People in Ireland really hate it when people from Britain (or Jersey, I guess) use the term "Eire." They think it sounds outdated, inaccurate and cond...
    • bggilmore on Cleveland, Day Two: I cruised through Atlantic City, New Jersey recently. Trump has some dead casinos there. He doesn't own them and yet his name is still on the building...
    • Timothy Rogers on Cleveland, Day Three: The question isn't her lying (she's an amateur compared to Trump on this front), but whether or not she's more suitable (and less dangerous) than Trum...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement