« | Home | »

Shampoo in the Eyes

Tags:

I’m in New York for the 30th anniversary of the LRB’s American launch. While this fact is not rocking the foundations of our democracy, it does mean that I had to listen to the second leaders’ debate over the radio. As everybody knows, radio can have a dramatically different impact from television. The famous example was the Nixon-Kennedy debate of 1960, won by Nixon on the radio and, decisively, by Kennedy on TV. Though as soon as I type those words, I find myself wondering what the relative size of the audiences was. In 1960, was the TV audience really so much bigger than the radio one? Wouldn’t that have meant that the impact of the debate was much closer than it is reported as being?

Anyway – I listened to the radio version. Several things were clear. The debate overall was more aggressive. Brown and Cameron were better prepared for Clegg, and did their best to come at him without too obviously being in cahoots; Clegg did well, though he didn’t self-evidently win the debate in the way that he self-evidently won the first one; Brown seemed more relaxed; Cameron was better too. Brown delivered his rehearsed zinger (about his sons squabbling in the bath) with more zeal than anything he’d managed in the first debate.

So much for the difference between radio and TV. Looking up the commentary online, I see that this is exactly the same as what everybody else thought. My sense of it is that by not-losing this debate, Clegg will come out of it a winner, perhaps even a big winner, in the sense that the Lib Dems’ objective will have been not to cede any of their previous gains.

One other thing. I’ve supervised quite a few fraternal bathtime arguments – I’m the Don King of them, minus the hair and the manslaughter conviction and the money – but I’ve never witnessed one that was triggered by an allegation that the Tory’s lunatic-fringe affiliations in the European parliament would have weakened Interpol’s ability to co-ordinate action against paedophilia. If they’re kicking off about that, just wait and see what happens when Clegg gets shampoo in Cameron’s eyes on purpose.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Josef C. on At the Gogol Centre: Certainly Kurt Schwitters (* 1887, Hannover, Germany; + 1948 in Kendal, Cumbria, England) and his 'Ursonate' belongs to this artistic league of the pl...
    • Phil on Cold War Ghosts: The conclusion may or may not be a ghost. A USA-Russia propaganda alliance sounds like a weak force, compared to actual trends, which are internal and...
    • Doetze on Cold War Ghosts: It is not the present-day leftists who admire Putin, but the xenophobic ultra-right wing nationalists. Le Pen and Wilders got financing from the Kreml...
    • Alex K. on At the Gogol Centre: "Bo-beh-o-bi, sang the lips" and the following lines are metrically convenient but grammatically problematic translations. Khlebnikov is using a refle...
    • Simon Wood on At the Gogol Centre: I am baffled by politics now, when it used to be like table football with a blue team and a red team. This is, indeed, like being a small child, not q...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement