
Adam Phillips’s On Balance, a book of essays, is due next year.
MORE BY THIS CONTRIBUTOR
RELATED ARTICLES
30 November 2006
Freud’s fan club
6 October 2005
Freud’s Free Clinics
29 November 2001
On ‘The Soul of Man under Psychoanalysis’
2 November 2006
How to Get on in the Literary World
19 October 2006
The Story of an English Family
23 March 2006
Mrs Freud
4 March 2004
Cannabis and empire
RELATED CATEGORIES
History, Cultural history, Psychology and psychoanalysis, Psychoanalysis, 1800-1899, 1900-1999, 1900-1945, Anti-semitism, Du Maurier, Daphne, Freud, Sigmund, Europe, Western Europe
Vol. 22 No. 10 · 18 May 2000
pages 8-10 | 4057 words

Unfathomable Craziness
Adam Phillips
- Svengali’s Web: The Alien Enchanter in Modern Culture by Daniel Pick
Yale, 284 pp, £19.95, May 2000, ISBN 0 300 08204 5
First of all we have to imagine a world in which people suffer and have no hope that anything or anyone can make a difference. Then we have to imagine what it would be like to live in a world of people who have no wish to help each other or to feel better. If we don’t do this, the history of medicine, and of its country cousin psychiatry, not to mention the history of religion, will hardly seem different from a history of quacks and con-artists ingeniously exploiting the hopelessly vulnerable. The question has always been: what, if anything, can be done? Only when we acknowledge the very real drawbacks of living in a world in which everyone’s unhappiness renders everyone else clueless, can we review our contemporary options and their histories with some sense of relief. We may have very real doubts now about, say, aromatherapy, or ECT, or cognitive psychology – or even about people having personal trainers – but we quite literally have to do something when we begin to feel in some way troubled. It is fortunate that pain has made us so inventive.
You are not Logged In
- If you have already registered login here
- If you are a print subscriber using the site for the first time please register here
- If you are not yet a subscriber you can subscribe here
- If you are a member of a subscribing institution or University library please login here
- If you have an Institutional print subscription and online access is not included, find out about our Institutional online subscriptions
This article is also available for purchase from the London Review Bookshop. Contact us for rights and issues enquiries.
print this article
Letters
Vol. 22 No. 12 · 22 June 2000
From Peter Breuer
For anyone who does not understand hypnosis, its craziness is certainly unfathomable. Adam Phillips (LRB, 18 May) writes: 'When Freud abrogates hypnosis as a therapeutic technique, psychoanalysis is born, and the 19th century begins to see sense, where previously there had only been the hocus-pocus of suggestion.' First, Freud did not abrogate hypnosis as a therapeutic technique. He abjured it, when he found that he did not have the ability to hypnotise some of his patients. Secondly, analysis was not born when Freud gave up hypnosis. It was born when Josef Breuer discovered that hysterical symptoms are induced by a repressed thought. Thirdly, there was no 'hocus-pocus of suggestion' when Breuer (and Freud after him) used hypnosis to carry out analysis, which is the opposite of suggestion. In suggestion you put an idea into a person's mind. In analysis you only seek to get out an idea, which is already in the person's mind.
Peter Breuer
Westcliff-on-Sea<br />Essex