
Timothy Garton Ash, a fellow of St Antony’s College, Oxford, was awarded the OSCE Prize for Journalism and Democracy in 1998. The File: A Personal History is available in paperback from Flamingo.
MORE BY THIS CONTRIBUTOR
RELATED ARTICLES
20 September 2001
On funerals, politics and memory in France
24 August 2000
On Marquis de Custine
10 June 1999
On the Cockney school
20 February 1997
At the Hop
2 January 1997
‘Famous for its Sausages’
21 May 1987
Pénétra
8 February 2007
Eighteenth-Century Surveillance Culture
RELATED CATEGORIES
Europe, 1700-1799, 1750-1799, 1780-1799, 1800-1899, 1900-1999, Censorship, History, Cultural history
Vol. 20 No. 6 · 19 March 1998
pages 18-20 | 3501 words

Comparative Horrors
Timothy Garton Ash
- Accusatory Practices: Denunciation in Modern European History, 1789-1989 edited by Sheila Fitzpatrick and Robert Gellately
Chicago, 231 pp, US $27.95, September 1997, ISBN 0 226 25273 6
I recently received a letter from a German theatre director, objecting to a passage of my book The File in which I wrote that, back in the Stalinist Fifties, an East German friend of mine had been ‘denounced’ by one Dr Warmbier, then a lecturer in Marxism-Leninism at Leipzig University. ‘It’s the word “denounced” that is wholly inappropriate,’ the director wrote, in defence of his old friend Dr Warmbier. He gave three reasons for thinking it inappropriate. Dr Warmbier had not, he argued, decisively contributed to my friend’s dismissal from the university; the letter in which Dr Warmbier criticised my friend had not been addressed to an official body; and Dr Warmbier had no selfish motives in lodging those criticisms. He was a Communist and was merely acting on his beliefs.
You are not Logged In
- If you have already registered login here
- If you are a print subscriber using the site for the first time please register here
- If you are not yet a subscriber you can subscribe here
- If you are a member of a subscribing institution or University library please login here
- If you have an Institutional print subscription and online access is not included, find out about our Institutional online subscriptions
[*] Stalinism and Nazism: Dictatorships in Comparison, edited by Ian Kershaw and Moshe Lewin (Cambridge, 381 pp., £45 and £15.95, 15 May 1997, 0 521 56345 3).
This article is also available for purchase from the London Review Bookshop. Contact us for rights and issues enquiries.
print this article
Letters
Vol. 20 No. 8 · 16 April 1998
From J. Elfenbein
Timothy Garton Ash (LRB, 19 March) points out how thin is the line dividing the denouncer of an individual to the state in a dictatorship and the whistle-blower in a democracy. In a recent Bundestag debate on ways to improve the efficiency of income tax collection in Germany, it was stated that the US Internal Revenue Service has a policy of openly encouraging individuals to inform on people they suspect of tax evasion, and that monetary rewards are promised in the event of the case going to prosecution. It was thought that this scheme might be useful in Germany, where tax-dodging is widespread; but the idea was quashed on the grounds that the results in the US are very meagre – ‘people denouncing their golf partners if they have an unpleasant golfing weekend’ – and are not nearly compensation enough for the encouragement of an informers’ society. A really effective informers’ society, it seems to me, needs a certain social discipline, such as that in Nazi Germany or the DDR. When such discipline is lacking, chaos results.
J. Elfenbein
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität<br />Mainz