Common Ground

Edmund Leach

  • A Social History of Western Europe 1450-1720: Tensions and Solidarities among Rural People by Sheldon Watts
    Hutchinson, 275 pp, £7.95, October 1984, ISBN 0 09 156081 0
  • Kinship in the Past: An Anthropology of European Family Life 1500-1900 by Andrejs Plakans
    Blackwell, 276 pp, £24.50, September 1984, ISBN 0 631 13066 7
  • Interests and Emotion: Essays on the Study of Family and Kinship edited by Hans Medick and David Warren Sabean
    Cambridge, 417 pp, £35.00, June 1984, ISBN 0 521 24969 4

All three of these books exemplify a convergence of interest between certain brands of academic historian and certain brands of academic social anthropologist. For a social anthropologist of my age and background this is a surprising development, though the trend has been under way for some time. It is surprising because, although social anthropology, under the influence of Auguste Comte and Herbert Spencer, first developed as a kind of grand-scale, synthetic history in which the data of ethnography were used as illustrations of a priori theories of social evolution or historical diffusion, it later developed into a self-consciously non-historical field of study. The basis for this reversal was the argument that the intimate face-to-face, day-to-day interactions of the individuals living together in a local community which provide the basic subject-matter of social anthropological fieldwork acquire meaningful significance only when they are observed in great detail and analysed as a single synchronous set of data in their original context. While it was recognised that some of the documents available to historians – such as letters, journals, parish registers, court records – may contain bits and pieces of detailed material of this sort, they can never be fitted together into a single coherent whole. And it is no use guessing on the basis of analogy from present to past. ‘Conjectural history’ is a waste of time.

You are not logged in