
Malcolm Deas is a fellow of St Antony’s College, Oxford. He spends his vacations in Bogotá.
MORE BY THIS CONTRIBUTOR
RELATED ARTICLES
17 June 1982
For ever Falkland?
20 October 2005
The Falklands War
3 March 1983
Politician’s War
3 March 1983
A military historian, Brian Bond, looks at the Falklands war
17 June 1982
Kelpers
20 May 1982
A Falklands Polemic
21 January 1999
Discusses the legal implications of the arrest of Augusto Pinochet in London in October 1998
RELATED CATEGORIES
Americas, South America, Argentina, Europe, Western Europe, UK, Current affairs, International relations, War, History
Vol. 4 No. 15 · 19 August 1982
pages 15-17 | 6126 words

Falklands Title Deeds
Malcolm Deas
- The Struggle for the Falkland Islands by Julius Goebel, introduced by J.C.J. Metford
Yale, 482 pp, £10.00, June 1982, ISBN 3 00 023944 8
- The Falklands Islands Dispute: International Dimensions edited by Joan Pearce
Chatham House, 47 pp, £2.75, April 1982, ISBN 0 905031 25 3
- The Falkland Islands: The Facts
HMSO, 12 pp, £50.00, May 1982, ISBN 0 11 701029 4
Territorial disputes are, in the Spanish phrase, matters de mucha teologia. These matters of much theology can easily cause violence; short statements about them are nearly always wrong; intensive study of individual problems can drive you round the bend. Experts in public international law, like theologians, frequently disagree, and like theologians they are not at all immune to national bias. There is also usually much mist surrounding what they are trying to get at. Arguments are frequently both inconclusive and unrewarding. Most editors in recent months avoided going into the background of the Falklands dispute in any detail – it would have taken up too much space. If one had to go into it at all, it was best to be brisk and muscular about it. On page 6 of Chatham House’s ‘Special’ The Falkland Islands Dispute – International Dimensions Professor James Fawcett agrees on line 3 that ‘the determination of territorial title, when it is disputed, is a complex issue of fact and law,’ and asserts on line 31 that ‘the territorial title to the islands... must be accorded to the United Kingdom.’ On this issue our public legal opinions have always been... robust.
You are not Logged In
- If you have already registered login here
- If you are a print subscriber using the site for the first time please register here
- If you are not yet a subscriber you can subscribe here
- If you are a member of a subscribing institution or University library please login here
- If you have an Institutional print subscription and online access is not included, find out about our Institutional online subscriptions
This article is also available for purchase from the London Review Bookshop. Contact us for rights and issues enquiries.
print this article
Letters
Vol. 4 No. 17 · 16 September 1982
From Andrew Graham-Yooll
SIR: I would like to add to Malcolm Deas’s excellent round-up of the Falkland Islands dispute (LRB, Vol. 4, No 15) the confirmation that Argentina’s claim against the United States, for damage caused to Luis Vernet’s settlement at Puerto Soledad in 1831, is still outstanding. Argentina’s protest was suspended, though not abandoned, circa 1890, when the State Department said it would not answer letters on the claim from Buenos Aires until the dispute over the Falkland Islands was settled with Britain. This is dealt with at length in the bilingual volume by the Argentine historian Ernesto J. Fitte: La Agresion Norteamericana a las Islas Malvinas (Emecé, Buenos Aires, 1966). Mr Deas is wrong to reject Hunter Christie’s assertion that Juan Peron revived the Malvinas issue. Although Argentina sent a written reminder of the dispute to Britain each year, as from 1946 Peron aroused popular feeling for the issue by, among other ways, introducing the history of the claim for the Malvinas to schoolchildren at a very early age.
Andrew Graham-Yooll
London NW11
Vol. 4 No. 18 · 7 October 1982
From Malcolm Deas
SIR: Andrew Graham-Yooll is certainly right that Peron increased the intensity of national feeling on the ‘Malvinas issue’ (LRB, Vol. 4, No 17). I just meant to say that Argentine claims to the islands had a long trajectory before he came to power.
Malcolm Deas
St Antony’s College, Oxford