« | Home | »

In Carthage

Tags: | |

Earlier this month a double celebration took place at Carthage, once the greatest city in the Mediterranean, destroyed by the Romans at the end of the Punic Wars and now a seaside suburb of Tunis. The anniversary of Hannibal’s defeat of the Roman army at Cannae in southern Italy on 2 August 216 BCE could be commemorated on the same day (2/8) as the beginning of the 2828th year since the foundation of the city by the Tyrian princess Dido in 814 BCE. Scholarly talks on Carthage and its heroes were followed by a carnival, including a parade from the acropolis to the amphitheatre with Carthaginian and Roman soldiers.

The Tunisian embrace of Dido, Hannibal and their city might seem surprising. The Phoenician colony of Carthage was as much a foreign power in North Africa as Rome was, even if Dido is supposed to have won over the local population with trickery rather than war: promising to live on no more land than she could cover with ox-hide, she cut the animal skin into such thin strips it could encircle the entire hill on which she then built her city. But its earliest known invader has helped to define the nation of Tunisia since independence from France in 1956.

Under Ottoman hegemony, from the 16th to 19th centuries, Tunisia’s history had been presented as purely Arab. From 1881, the French Protectorate emphasised the Roman occupation of North Africa, presenting France as the inheritor of Rome’s imperial mission. But the independent state’s coat of arms featured a Phoenician ship as a symbol of freedom, and both Tunisia’s presidents between independence and revolution exploited the place of Carthage in the new nation’s past.

Habib Bourguiba built his presidential palace at Carthage, and encouraged Unesco’s archaeological campaigns of the 1970s that brought the ancient city back to light. State celebrations for Carthage’s 28th centenary in 1986 happily coincided with the 30th anniversary of independence. Bourguiba was particularly fond of Hannibal as a symbol of resistance to Roman, and therefore European, colonialism, and schoolbooks taught – not unreasonably – that Rome was the aggressor in the Punic Wars, forcing Carthage to resist. As the slogan went, ‘Hannibal was one of us.’

Under Zine El-Abedine Ben Ali, a ‘Carthageland’ theme park was built in a tourist resort an hour’s drive down the coast, ‘Hannibal TV’ was launched as the first commercial television channel, and the government sponsored foreign exhibitions about Carthage. In 1994-95 Hannibal’s march on Rome was recreated, though using buses rather then elephants, and presenting fancy-dress moments in Carthaginian history at stops in Tunis, Madrid, Cannes and Rome.

Carthage was used not only as a symbol of resistance to European colonialism, but also as a symbolic weapon in the hands of the secular government against the increasing popularity of political Islam, and the notion that Tunisia was a solely Islamic or Arab country. Tunisia on this reading had always been a Mediterranean society, a bridge between Eastern and Western cultures with multiple ethnic roots. Even reasonably peaceable Romans could claim a place in this national history, with St Augustine’s story taught in schools alongside Hannibal’s.

Despite its popularity with the old regime, this version of the nation’s past remains the most visible in post-revolutionary Tunisia, where the national football team is still known as the Eagles of Carthage, Hannibal’s triumphs are still celebrated, and even his Roman enemies are invited to the party.

Comments on “In Carthage”

  1. @joeplommer says:

    Recently read Edward Said’s ‘Covering Islam’; I think he’d have approved of Josephine Quinn on Tunisia: http://t.co/wZgBJlDjW2 via @LRB

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement