« | Home | »

Boris Johnson’s Great and Glorious Future


The mayor of London riding sidecar to the Polish foreign minister

The mayor of London riding sidecar to the Polish foreign minister

The text of Boris Johnson’s speech at Bloomberg headquarters on Wednesday has the following helpful subheadings: ‘The European Nightmare’, ‘The Solution – Reform and Referendum’, ‘But Be Prepared for a New Future’, ‘The Dream’. The first part of the speech is devoted to the nightmare of EU health and safety regulations (truck drivers must not drive for more than nine hours a day etc), but Britain could have ‘a great and glorious’ future if it leaves the EU. London is already ‘the America of the European Union’ (because it’s a place of ‘massive opportunity’, not because it’s one of the most unequal cities on earth).

Johnson mentioned that he’d recently been in Bydgoszcz, and praised Poland for having kept out of the euro. Oddly, he didn’t mention seeing his old friend Radek Sikorski, the Polish foreign minister and former Bullingdon Club member who tweeted pictures of them together at the weekend. It’s hard to believe they didn’t discuss the part of Johnson’s speech of most interest to some of their fellow Bullingdonians: ‘So, let me put it this way – I have not got any particular seat lined up but I do think in all probability – since you can’t do these things furtively, I might as well be absolutely clear – in all probability I will try to find somewhere to stand in 2015.’

The Conservative Party has already chosen 74 of its prospective parliamentary candidates. Whether unaligned voters would want Boris Johnson to be their MP is beside the point. The only thing that matters is his appeal to a local Conservative Association, and for the last paid-up members of a dying grassroots party, Johnson would be irresistible: imagine the attendance at the next summer fete.

There’s speculation that Johnson might look to be selected in Uxbridge and South Ruislip, whose longstanding MP (majority at the last election: 11,216) is retiring. This would present a staggering conflict of interest for a mayor of London who is pushing for a new airport in the Thames Estuary to replace Heathrow – and makes all Johnson’s pronouncements on the subject even more suspect than they have already been. He may have local support for the move – the current Conservative leader of Hillingdon Council has campaigned against a third runway at Heathrow whenever it’s been suggested.

There are plenty of powerful arguments against HS2, but when Johnson has weighed in locally, he’s attacked the proposed connection from the high speed line at Ickenham to Heathrow: it’s ‘a ludicrous waste of money and should be scrapped’. Howard Davies, the chairman of the Airports Commission says that the coalition has asked him to delay his report on the future of London’s airports until after the election. Johnson has called the commission’s approach ‘gloopy and tangled’. Davies accused of the mayor of ‘vulgar abuse’.

There’s an orgy of interest in what Johnson will do and where he will stand. One option that doesn’t appear to be on the table is his stepping down as mayor to take up a seat outside London. Still, north-west Londoners desperate to have an old Etonian and Bullingdonian for an MP need only move north across the boundary to Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner, which has been represented since 2010 by Nick (son of Douglas) Hurd.

Comments on “Boris Johnson’s Great and Glorious Future”

  1. streetsj says:

    Where is the conflict of interest? Electors know where he stands on the issue before they vote. What am I missing?

  2. Harry Stopes says:

    The conflict is that as Mayor he’s supposed to take decisions for the benefit of London as a whole. At the same time though, Boris qua Boris (as opposed to Boris qua Mayor) may be inclined to favour a particular set of Londoners, those whose parliamentary votes he may want. A possible seat in Uxbridge and his opposition to Heathrow expansion makes this a real possibility.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement