« | Home | »

The Mess Nigeria Is In


Were 276 girls abducted from a government secondary school in the town of Chibok in north-eastern Nigeria on 14 April? That anyone could ask the question, as the president’s wife allegedly did last weekend, says much about the mess we’re in. It took the president more than two weeks to call a press conference to tell the world: ‘I don’t know where they are… there is no confirmation of the location of the schoolgirls, you are a journalist, you know more than me.’ We are still none the wiser, even as Western powers descend on the country to help find them. We are not even sure of the numbers involved, which have fluctuated between 200 and 300; but the story seems to have finally woken everybody up – both in Nigeria and abroad.

This is not the first time Boko Haram has abducted girls, nor is it the first time they have publicly said what they would do with them: ‘Women are slaves. I want to reassure my Muslim brothers that Allah says slaves are permitted in Islam.’ But it is the first time that Nigerians have rallied around a common cause and stood their ground. People came out in large numbers two years ago, when the government raised the price of petrol overnight, but they were frightened away by the army. The army wasn’t called out this time, but two protest organisers were detained for several hours, for reasons that remain unclear. Their detention was widely seen as yet another example of the government’s hamfisted approach to a national tragedy of its own making.

President Goodluck Jonathan is not himself responsible for the emergence of Islamic terrorism, nor is he entirely to blame for the bungling way his government has gone about failing to address it. In 1980, a religious leader known as Maitatsine and his followers staged an uprising in the city of Kano, in the north-east, which lasted over three weeks and left more than 4000 dead. Maitatsine himself was killed and buried in a secret location. In those days Nigeria was ruled by men from the largely Islamic north – as opposed to the largely Christian south – so the violence was considered an internal matter between those who desired the strict implementation of shariah law and the decadent backsliders in power.

But now power has shifted south. Worse yet, Jonathan comes from the oil-producing Niger Delta, where all the money comes from. It’s possible that Boko Haram may have been initially encouraged by the northern ruling class as a way for them to wrest back power, which has now spiralled out of control. It is certainly true that the violence currently associated with the sect only exploded in late 2010, when Jonathan emerged as the leading contender for the 2011 elections following a series of unforeseen events, including the death of the serving northern president, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua.

Unfortunately for Jonathan, the long years of corruption which he inherited, and which he has himself deepened – ‘If you talk about ownership of private jets, Nigeria will be among the first 10 countries,’ he said last week, ‘yet they are saying that Nigeria is among the five poorest countries’ – have enfeebled every institution in the country, above all the military. The top brass – the ‘pepper-soup generals’ – loot the bloated security budget in order to entertain their girlfriends in plush Abuja hotels, while the rank and file are sent off to engage rebels who are better armed than they are. The Islamists, on the other hand, have ready recruits in the so-called Almajiris, the more than 12 million young men whose only education has been studying the Koran in Arabic, a language not spoken in Nigeria.

In 2005, an American think-tank, the National Intelligence Council, raised the spectre of ‘the outright collapse of Nigeria’ by 2015. The best-case scenario now is that we become another Pakistan where whole ‘tribal areas’ are out of bounds to all outsiders except American drones. But at least most Pakistanis are Muslims. Here in Nigeria we are now witnessing the rise of Christian fundamentalism in response to the Islamic threat. The Christian Association of Nigeria described the kidnapped Christian girls as ‘Daughters of Zion taken captive, to be treated as slaves and sold into marriage to unclean people.’

Comments on “The Mess Nigeria Is In”

  1. @StillSUDAN says:

    The Mess #Nigeria Is In http://t.co/4ik2XXfKe6 via @sharethis Some needed politics on #BokoHaram

  2. stettiner says:

    “but the story seems to have finally woken everybody up”

    Not everybody. Our hero, Glenn Greenwald has this to say on Twitter:

    “The ability to ignore virtually all history when advocating for The Next Western Intervention is as impressive as it is horrifying”

    • Harry Stopes says:

      In leaving out the context of Greenwald’s remark, you distort his meaning. He tweeted that phrase in reference to an article on Comment Is Free by Rhiannon Coslett which simplistically endorsed an unspecified, un-thought out “intervention” by the west. What is “horrifying” to Greenwald was Coslett’s amnesiac assumption that the west (specifically, western militaries) is so omnipotent as to be able to solve complex problems by simple means, with human cost or unforeseen circumstances. To imply, as you appear to be doing, that Greenwald simply doesn’t care about Nigeria or the abducted schoolgirls is a distortion.

  3. John Cowan says:

    Although Arabic is certainly not a dominant language of Nigeria, a variant usually called Shuwa Arabic or Chadic Arabic (though it is spoken in several countries) is spoken by about 100,000 people there. It is not mutually intelligible with Standard Arabic or the better-known Arabic varieties.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement