« | Home | »

Assessing Atos

Tags: | |

‘We have come to assess you,’ the crowd in Triton Square chanted, outside Atos’s London headquarters. The French IT company is under contract to the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) to carry out Work Capability Assessments on everyone applying for Employment and Support Allowance. A ‘disability analyst’ asks a ‘claimant’ a series of questions and enters the answers into a computer: if you score fewer than 15 points you are considered fit for work. There have been more than 1.2 million appeals against Atos’s assessments, 38 per cent of which have been successful. Atos’s blunders include the cases of Linda Wootton, who had a heart and lung transplant and died nine days after her allowance was withdrawn, and Mark Evans, a brain-damaged amputee who lost most of his benefits. Protests were held yesterday outside the company’s offices across Britain. The slogans in Triton Square included ‘Atos don’t give a toss’ and ‘Atos £500m contract killer’: that’s the estimated cost of the appeals; the company’s government contracts are worth a total of £3.1 billion.

Joyce Drummond, a nurse who used to work for Atos, gave evidence to the Scottish Parliament in 2012, describing the company’s methods. If you waited a long time to be called that means you can sit at a desk; if you were reading a paper the assessor ticks the box that says ‘able to concentrate’. If you look smart, that’s evidence of manual dexterity; if you smile you can’t be depressed. If you turn up for your appointment unaccompanied, greet the assessor with one hand and proffer a bundle of supporting evidence from your GP with the other, your chances of qualifying for benefits are slim.

Nearly 1500 people have completed a questionnaire called ‘Assessing the Assessors: Are Atos fit for work?’ Anyone who has had a Work Capability Assessment has till 10 March to fill it out. On 21 March the data will be submitted to a parliamentary select committee. The campaigners have also secured a House of Commons debate on 27 February. One of them, Ian Jones, who went through three appeals to get his benefits, told the crowd yesterday about a man with a severe mental disorder who was assessed by a physio nurse.

Last May a judicial review found that the existing process put people with mental health problems at a disadvantage; the DWP appealed the ruling, but lost in December. Yet the system is still in place. According to DWP statistics, 10,600 people died in 2011 within six weeks of their benefits being stopped. One of the protesters yesterday told me that his partner tried to kill herself shortly before she was due to attend her renewal appointment with Atos.

For all the anger at the company, most demonstrators agreed that the real culprit was the DWP. The original contract between the DWP and Atos included percentages of applicants likely to qualify for benefits, estimates which Atos seems to have been treating as targets. If Atos loses the contract there is every chance that its successor will be just as bad. ‘Next time we’ll just have to sit outside some other office,’ said Lisa, a wheelchair-bound activist who, after being assessed at an Atos centre, had to prove she really was there.

Comments on “Assessing Atos”

  1. BBeckett says:

    When you enter the maze, the thread is essential to survival.

    Please provide an easy print function on discourses such as this.

    If we are prepared and provided with {non-device dependent archival material} ie. paper printouts, we may be able to “deal/engage”

    and a chronologically identified archive record (ie. printed page) allows a return to what may have been a more civilised regime

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement