« | Home | »

Assessing Atos

Tags: | |

‘We have come to assess you,’ the crowd in Triton Square chanted, outside Atos’s London headquarters. The French IT company is under contract to the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) to carry out Work Capability Assessments on everyone applying for Employment and Support Allowance. A ‘disability analyst’ asks a ‘claimant’ a series of questions and enters the answers into a computer: if you score fewer than 15 points you are considered fit for work. There have been more than 1.2 million appeals against Atos’s assessments, 38 per cent of which have been successful. Atos’s blunders include the cases of Linda Wootton, who had a heart and lung transplant and died nine days after her allowance was withdrawn, and Mark Evans, a brain-damaged amputee who lost most of his benefits. Protests were held yesterday outside the company’s offices across Britain. The slogans in Triton Square included ‘Atos don’t give a toss’ and ‘Atos £500m contract killer’: that’s the estimated cost of the appeals; the company’s government contracts are worth a total of £3.1 billion.

Joyce Drummond, a nurse who used to work for Atos, gave evidence to the Scottish Parliament in 2012, describing the company’s methods. If you waited a long time to be called that means you can sit at a desk; if you were reading a paper the assessor ticks the box that says ‘able to concentrate’. If you look smart, that’s evidence of manual dexterity; if you smile you can’t be depressed. If you turn up for your appointment unaccompanied, greet the assessor with one hand and proffer a bundle of supporting evidence from your GP with the other, your chances of qualifying for benefits are slim.

Nearly 1500 people have completed a questionnaire called ‘Assessing the Assessors: Are Atos fit for work?’ Anyone who has had a Work Capability Assessment has till 10 March to fill it out. On 21 March the data will be submitted to a parliamentary select committee. The campaigners have also secured a House of Commons debate on 27 February. One of them, Ian Jones, who went through three appeals to get his benefits, told the crowd yesterday about a man with a severe mental disorder who was assessed by a physio nurse.

Last May a judicial review found that the existing process put people with mental health problems at a disadvantage; the DWP appealed the ruling, but lost in December. Yet the system is still in place. According to DWP statistics, 10,600 people died in 2011 within six weeks of their benefits being stopped. One of the protesters yesterday told me that his partner tried to kill herself shortly before she was due to attend her renewal appointment with Atos.

For all the anger at the company, most demonstrators agreed that the real culprit was the DWP. The original contract between the DWP and Atos included percentages of applicants likely to qualify for benefits, estimates which Atos seems to have been treating as targets. If Atos loses the contract there is every chance that its successor will be just as bad. ‘Next time we’ll just have to sit outside some other office,’ said Lisa, a wheelchair-bound activist who, after being assessed at an Atos centre, had to prove she really was there.

Comments on “Assessing Atos”

  1. BBeckett says:

    When you enter the maze, the thread is essential to survival.

    Please provide an easy print function on discourses such as this.

    If we are prepared and provided with {non-device dependent archival material} ie. paper printouts, we may be able to “deal/engage”

    and a chronologically identified archive record (ie. printed page) allows a return to what may have been a more civilised regime

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement