« | Home | »

At the Korean Cultural Centre

Tags:

meekyoung_shin_cumberland

There is nothing obviously odd about the generic military-man-on-a-horse partly visible through the nearly leafless trees in Cavendish Square. He is William, Duke of Cumberland (1721-65), and the plinth would lead you to believe his statue has been there since 1770. It hasn’t.

It was there from 1770 until 1868, by which time ‘Butcher’ Cumberland, the man responsible for the English atrocities after the Battle of Culloden, was a much-hated figure. There was no dramatic demolition, indeed there is still some doubt about what happened to the lead original, whether it was removed for repair and tactfully not replaced, or whether the fifth Duke of Portland had it melted down.

What is certain is that it went and its plinth stood empty for 144 years. The figure that now turns its horse’s handsome rump on the 21st-century square, John Lewis, RBS and Pret a Manger, has been there since last June. It is the work of the Korean sculptor Meekyoung Shin and it is made of soap. Here and there a bit of a limb has dropped off, revealing the steel armature, but otherwise it is in good shape. The plan was for it to be there a year, but in a striking reversal of its predecessor’s fate it is staying on by popular request. The statue is a gentle intervention, subtler than anything that has yet been made of the empty slot in Trafalgar Square. Its implied critique of the heroic, of fame and history, civic space, political art and national memory is left to play itself out, or not, in the minds of passers-by.

In Shin’s exhibition Unfixed, at the Korean Cultural Centre in London until 18 January, there are similarly interwoven strands of history and iconography, as well as a powerful smell of soap. The show is in three parts. The first and largest consists of vases and jars, standing on packing cases. They imitate ceramic, cloisonné and jade, and their transitional, intermediary nature is reinforced by the delivery labels and ‘FRAGILE’ warnings stencilled on the crates. The theme has an autobiographical quality – Shin has lived in London since 1995 and says she no longer feels ‘strictly Korean’ – but there are also, as with Cumberland, meditations on international history, as well as on exiles and exports.

Western Europe’s quest for the secret of hard-paste porcelain manufacture became a mania in the early 18th century and while the hunt was on the rich relied on oriental imports. These were duly tailored to the buyers’ expectations. Noble families sent copies of their coats of arms to China to have blank dinner services decorated (one set is said to have come back with the motto ‘Think and Thank’ rewritten ‘Stink and Stank’). In time, a repertoire of decorative motifs evolved, different from Eastern tradition, to suit the foreign taste. It is all here: the carp and the pagodas, rippling dragons, samurai and jasmine, as well as one sepia scene of a little Dutch fishing village, its gabled church, unfamiliar to the hand that painted it, waving as if underwater. The details of form, the lips, lids and lugs, are precisely reproduced. Like the originals they mimic, Shin’s works are vessels that offer the eye what it wishes to see, and hold their other meanings in reserve.

Unfixed is a reverberating pun on taste and materials. It plays with conventional East-West contrasts – tradition v. innovation, craft v. free expression – and questions them with work that is technically immensely accomplished, but also ephemeral, inventive and personal. In the second part of the exhibition soap becomes glass: jars, jugs and vases of every sort from the finest Austrian ruby to the thickly speckled bottles of the ancient Greeks and Romans. Vividly coloured they sit in rows, as if smiling at the various conceits they embody. For the final section the soap turns into stone and marble in pieces copied from antique statuary. They bear the marks of time intact, the missing noses faithfully unrestored.

Translation Series, Soap, dimensions variable, installation view at 'Unfixed', KCCUK

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement