« | Home | »

Academic Visa Requirements

Tags: |

In his recent piece for the LRB on university privatisation, Stefan Collini mentioned that the UK Border Agency sees ‘universities and colleges as an easy target in its efforts to cut immigration’. The ancient historian Josephine Quinn describes on her blog this week some of the often insurmountable hurdles facing academics from other countries invited to conferences in the UK. To get a visa, they have to ‘demonstrate’ they are not going to stay in the country, which means providing:

full bank statements for the last six months with explanations of any unusual deposits; a letter from their bank confirming the balance and the date the account was opened; documentation of the origin of any money paid into the account; payslips for the last six months; recent tax returns; and evidence of income from any property or land, including property deeds, mortgage statements, tenancy agreements, land registration documents and crop receipts. They also have to supply information on their visit, including travel tickets, accommodation bookings, and email correspondence about any planned trips or outings. ‘General visitors’ are also invited to submit documentation of the finances and immigration status of the person they are visiting, while ’business visitors’ have to provide ‘evidence of previous dealings with the UK company they are visiting’ – invoices, evidence of business meetings, email correspondence. All this, for a visit of perhaps 48 hours.

Read the full post here.

Comments on “Academic Visa Requirements”

  1. noel thomas says:

    Josephine Quinn shines a very necessary beam of light on the Border Agency’s attitudes to bona fide academic visitors. As the UK ‘sponsor ‘ of a Kenyan lady, invited to speak at a professional congress, I was recently obliged to provide six months of bank statements, letters from my solicitor and accountant and employer ( my self employed status was an almost insuperable obstacle ), confirming that I was not in debt, owned my house, no criminal record, and was compliant at work. Her application for a two week visa was turned down. The reason given was that I did not have a proven connection to the Kenyan organisation where she worked. The visa application papers had made no mention of this requirement.
    I happened to be in Kenya a month before the congress.
    We had paid for her return ticket to the UK, two months before that.
    A two day visit to Nairobi was therefore obligatory. No one conducts negotiations with a government dept in Kenya by phone , fax, mail or email. You take your concern to the Ministry, in Nairobi, in person, and join the queue.
    After a grim morning in the out sourced Visa dept, I asked to see someone in the adjacent UK High Commission. They had no visa dept, the armed gatekeeper assured me. We persisted, and after leaving all my belongings, apart from my clothes, outside the gate, I was allowed in. There was a huge, empty waiting room, beside the visa office, where I presented the evidence of my six previous extended visits to the Kenyan project.
    I left, thoroughly ashamed to be British.
    My colleague was given a visa with a week to spare.
    We had encountered dozens of visa applicants, from Somalia and Tanzania as well as Kenya. The application fee would have meant a few months pay for most of them. Many of questions asked were ambivalent to me – with a lifetime’s experience of forms to read and complete.
    I doubt if any of those other applicants were successful. No right of appeal, no telephone help line, and no one was allowed help from officials or outside agents, to complete the forms- on pain of instant disqualification.
    Why do Kenyans, and other Africans, continue to treat wazungos like me, with friendship and politeness, when they are subjected to such appalling treatment ?
    We talk of being citizens of a global village.
    Maybe we are, if we have a western passport.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Stephen W. Smith:
    The French Intervention in Mali
    7 February 2013

    ‘Depending on what counts as military intervention, France changed the course of history by force in sub-Saharan Africa about thirty times between 1945 and 1990.’

    Bruce Whitehouse:
    What went wrong in Mali?
    30 August 2012

    ‘The Republic of Mali has long been seen as the exception to the dictatorships or civil wars that have seemed the rule in West Africa since the end of the Cold War.’

    Jeremy Harding: Algeria’s Camus
    4 December 2014

    ‘Camus liked to hector the settlers, whose behaviour reflected the structural injustices of colonialism. All the same, he felt that certain misconceptions in metropolitan France needed straightening out.’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement