« | Home | »

With Pussy Riot

Tags:

Two members of the Pussy Riot collective were in London last week to meet their supporters and discuss future plans. They had to keep a low profile for security reasons – the meeting I went to was in a room at the back of a nondescript café. The activists, who introduced themselves as Serafima and Schumacher, spoke about the difficulties they face in Russia. Four of their videos have been placed on the Federal List of Extremist Materials; though not officially banned, the group is a de facto underground movement; and of course two of its members remain in prison. There are currently eight people in the collective, flanked by a support group, which has been infiltrated by government spies.

Questioned about important artistic and political influences on Pussy Riot, Serafima and Schumacher said that the group ‘is against any personality cult and for equality’, and wouldn’t mention any names. ‘Early 20th-century Russian feminists’ was as specific as they were prepared to be. They see themselves as part of the third wave of feminism and hate the idea of a female face being used as a trademark. What about bright tights and balaclavas? That’s unacceptable too, as is the apparent product placement in the documentary Pussy Riot: A Punk Prayer, released in January. The activists also say it takes liberties with the facts. Talks are underway with the film-makers, who may agree to add ‘fictionalised version’ to the title.

People asked about ways of supporting Pussy Riot – Maria Alyokhina and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova in particular. Serafima and Schumacher urged us to write to the imprisoned women. Their contact with the outside world has been restricted, but the few letters they get mean a lot to them. We were also encouraged to protest, like the demonstrators at the G8 summit in Belfast who called for the Russian government to free the members of Pussy Riot.

I asked Serafima and Schumacher if they had a lawyer. They said it would be good to be able to afford one. A fund set up to support Pussy Riot, managed by the Voice Project, is divided between the two jailed activists, but the possibility of splitting it three ways is now being discussed.

Someone suggested that it may be time to celebrate Pussy Riot’s achievements, mentioning the surge of creativity the group has inspired all over the world. Serafima and Schumacher looked bemused: the interpreter had translated ‘celebrate’ as prazdnovat’, which primarily means ‘to have a party’. She tried rephrasing the question in several ways. When they finally understood what kind of celebration was implied, their answer amounted to: ‘Definitely not.’

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement