« | Home | »

Conditions of Sale

Tags: |

For most clubs in the NPower Championship, the football division below the Premier League, the season is now over. Cardiff City will be promoted as champions, along with Hull City, who came second. The next four teams are competing for the third promotion place. Leicester City beat Watford 1-0 in their first leg last night; Crystal Palace are playing Brighton and Hove Albion this evening; after the second legs on Sunday and Monday the winners will meet at Wembley.
 
Palace and Brighton have a longstanding rivalry. Violence between fans isn’t unknown. It’s standard practice with such ‘high risk’ matches for the police to make special plans. Police numbers go up, and more or less onerous restrictions are placed on fans: only season ticket holders may be eligible for tickets to away matches; trains to and from the match may be alcohol-free; movement outside the ground after the game may be limited.
 
But the restrictions on Brighton fans going to Palace tonight are something new. Anyone who bought a ticket had their personal details shared with Crystal Palace, the Metropolitan Police and Sussex Police. A ticket may only be used by the person it was issued to; fans must carry identification with them and be ready to produce it when asked, by any steward or police officer, in the stadium, or during some undefined period ‘en route to or from the stadium’. Failure to produce a ticket and ID will result in a ban from all matches for the rest of the season. Anyone found with a ticket that was issued to another person, or anyone found to have given or sold their ticket to someone else, will be banned for a year.
  
A barrister with experience in defending football fans told me that the restrictions almost certainly wouldn’t stand up in court. They are not being enforced with the threat of a Football Banning Order, because walking around without identification is not actually a crime, even if you are a football fan. Instead, the vague terms of the conditions of sale promise an ‘exclusion’, likely in practice to be enforced not by the courts but by the clubs. The police have long presumed all football fans are guilty; now it seems supporters’ own clubs are acting on the assumption too. Either Brighton or Crystal Palace may play in the Premier League next season, in which case I may try to catch the game when Manchester City come down south. I’ll bring a lawyer.

Comments on “Conditions of Sale”

  1. Harry Stopes says:

    This is a letter from barrister Alison Gurden to Bernard Hogan-Howe:
    http://alisongurden.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/signed-letter-to-commissioner-bernard-hogan-howe-on-police-restrictions-on-fans-at-the-cpfc-v-bhafc-matches-10th-may-and-13th-may-2013.pdf

    Key remarks:
    “There does not seem to be any provision for the situation where a fan refuses to produce their ID to a police officer, other than the fact that the football club will impose a year ban. THIS SMACKS OF THE FOOTBALL CLUB BEING USED TO ENFORCE A RULE WHICH THE POLICE, AS A PUBLIC AUTHORITY, CANNOT ENFORCE.” (Emphasis added.)

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement