« | Home | »

Guns of Foxtons

Tags: |

Foxtons estate agents started out in Notting Hill in 1981, and opened their second branch in Fulham two years later. It was just the time for them. Large Victorian houses were being stripped down and redone, and in a recession London property still represented a good investment.

The Brixton branch of Foxtons opened last weekend. The windows are full of two-bedroom flats for 11 times the median London salary. Rents meanwhile keep going up – by as much as 15 per cent last year, according to the Standard.

Foxtons are probably no more cut-throat than any other large successful estate agents, but their marketing – down to the branded Minis – makes them the most visible and the most hated symbol of a London property market which never really had a crash.

Property prices in Brixton have been going up steadily since the post-riot low of the 1980s, but it’s visibly changed a lot since I first lived there in 2008. Two years ago the indoor markets Granville Arcade (rechristened Brixton Village in 2009) and Market Row were leased out by the freeholder, London and Associated Properties, to a subsidiary of Groupe Geraud, the largest market operator in Europe. LAP receive a base rent of £817,500 and a 50 per cent share of market profits over a certain level. To feed this deal, rents are going up.

A recent campaign to ‘Save Nour Cash and Carry’ from a 22 per cent rent hike has succeeded, for now, but it will be a temporary victory. The engines of neighbourhood change are the property market and the retail and leisure economy, and in the end they don’t defer to petitions. The urban experience is shaped by money, so the power to shape it isn’t evenly distributed. When politicians celebrate the ‘revitalisation’ or ‘regeneration’ of neighbourhoods without recognising this, they give up any prospect of managing change for the benefit of their poorest constituents.

The G-word is verboten for some Brixton-boosters, but gentrification has been going on for a long time, whatever the denialists may say, and the arrival of Foxtons and the battle over the market are more like the culmination of that process than the starting gun. The most recent arrivals are disliked by those who came just before them, but they – or rather we – are fooling ourselves if we think we aren’t part of the change. A 2001 study of two areas of Brixton near Brockwell Park, a street away from where I live, detected a gap between the professed tastes and the lived realities of middle-class Brixtonites:

There appears to be something of a gulf between a widely circulated rhetorical preference for multicultural experience and people’s actual social networks and connections… relations between different social and ethnic groups in the area tend to be of a parallel rather than integrative nature.

Comments on “Guns of Foxtons”

  1. Chris Larkin says:

    The spread of gentrification has been going on for a long time in South London. Though still seen by some as the place where black cabs fear to venture the reality couldn’t be further from that. Having lived in Wimbledon, Peckham, Stockwell and Brixton, where I currently am, over the last 5 years or so only the most blinkered could fail to see the changes to all these areas. It seemed to start in Clapham and move steadily through Balham and into Brixton and while it would be churlish of me to deny enjoying Brixton Village and the spate of new bars and eating establishments that have popped up over the last two years or so, the opening of Foxtons does have something of a fin de siècle feel about it (incidentally so did the opening of the new faux-run-down Effra Social, owned by the Antic pub chain). Whilst acknowledging the social integration problem highlighted, and being somewhat guilty of it myself, it does seem that Brixton is losing some of the character that makes it a unique place to live and it is a shame that small shops like Pempamsie and others may be forced to close if this trend continues. If the rental prices keep going the way they are however i’m almost certain I won’t be there to see it happen.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement