« | Home | »

Get Your Authentic Hot Water Here

Tags: |

Pity the poor customers of Harris + Hoole, a new coffee chain, who discovered that Tesco has a 49 per cent stake in what they thought was an ‘independent’ business. One such customer told the Guardian that she felt ‘upset’ and ‘duped’, since she would never dream of patronising Tesco itself.

In one way this just demonstrates the omnivorous ingenuity of capital in appropriating and selling back to us what looked like a challenge to it. The ‘independence’ of an ‘independent coffee shop’ is now quite likely to be a corporate simulacrum. The manager of Harris + Hoole’s Crouch End branch is reported to have said that head office ‘had instructed her to make the store feel as independent as possible’, which is perhaps only superficially a paradox. ‘We try to be independent,’ she said. ‘We want to be independent. We want to have that feel.’ 

A rival coffee-shop owner fumed: ‘Tesco isn’t stupid. They don’t want their name to be part of the name [over the door of the coffee shop]. They know it doesn’t match with artisan values they are trying to make money out of.’ Presumably this man isn’t himself trying to make money out of the ‘artisan value’ of pumping hot water through ground coffee beans, instead selling his beverages at cost to his happy customers – though that does raise the question of why they would ever have dreamed of going down the road to Harris + Hoole instead.

But why should ‘artisan values’ be incompatible with corporate backing? The term ‘artisanal’ seems to have leaked into our catering culture from France, where it actually means something. A Parisian bakery offering artisanal bread is promising that it is made from scratch on the premises, rather than frozen elsewhere and finished off in the shop (that would be ‘pain industriel’).

But the unexamined British genuflection to ‘independence’ and ‘artisan values’ represents a vaguer dream of returning to an imagined cottage-industrial idyll, and is part of our more general veneration of the ‘authentic’ – a veneration exploited by such companies as Pret A Manger. Once a stringently demanding aspiration of existentialists, authenticity is now merely a desirable property of a commercial commodity, whether it’s a takeaway Americano or a head of heirloom chard.

Comments on “Get Your Authentic Hot Water Here”

  1. bluecat says:

    I’d like to know which companies are really Tesco, or largely owned by Tesco, the better to avoid them.

    But that’s got nothing at all to do with wanting some mystical authentic or artisanal virtue to be transmitted with my slightly-coffee-flavoured froth.

    I avoid buying from Tesco because of their flagrant abuse of the planning system, their behaviour in Thailand, their tax-dodging, and many other reasons.

    It’s about politics and ethics, not style and consumerism.

    • farthington says:

      Ditto with Bluecat.

      I’m staggered that one reads such tosh in the LRB.

      Tesco and its comparators (Walmart as the anti-Christ, Coles & Woolworths in my Australia – lovers of all practices and personnel Tescoian) are an engine for the accumulation and use and abuse of market power. The bankrupt tertiary economics syllabus has still to catch up. Check out the Competition Commission’s April 2008 ‘Supply of Groceries in the UK’ report, esp Ch.11, for a valiant attempt to gauge the abuse of monopsony power.

      Tesco’s equivalent in France (read Carrefour in particular) are now so powerful that they flout the law (esp re planning and building rules) with total impunity.

      “But why should ‘artisan values’ be incompatible with corporate backing?” Corporate backing artisan values is an oxymoron. “a vaguer dream of returning to an imagined cottage-industrial idyll” I live that idyll daily; it’s not a dream and it’s tangible.

      Isn’t ‘consumer sovereignty’ supposed to be a core principle of a workable market? Information is fundamental to that principle. Misleading information, strategically constructed, is not merely dysfunctional, but unconsionable. And it is actionable.

  2. Puck says:

    Actually the “rival coffee shop owner” puts a lot of care and knowledge into his coffee: he sells a diverse range of beans and the coffee is very good. So I can see what he means. Harris and Hoole is a cosy spot to hang out, though, and the coffee is much better than Starbucks next door.

    Crouch End must be one of the most highly caffeinated suburbs of London, with at least a dozen coffee places within a five-minute walk. I tend to walk to the shops and bounce back home.

  3. flannob says:

    Very easy to be romantic about corporate/independent, but my favorite Crouch End bistro always seems to have slightly sticky tables, another in Hackney proffered swarf with the excellent risotto, and two in less salubrious Holloway were tinned up after being found to be less than independent from non-corporate drug organisations. Personally,I look forward to a revival of record shops by imitations of e.g.Terrapin Trucking, very late of Crouch End (“we don’t sell CDs”illuminated by a dim lightbulb.) Who knows, we may witness design wars between corporate giants, fighting for the most quirky artists to serve the aesthetic requirements of flush flanneurs.

  4. upozi says:

    The last two paragraphs of Mr Poole’s post seem to have some meaning but having read them three times, I cant for the life of me think what it is.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement