« | Home | »

Preventable Harm

Tags: |

It’s increasingly hard to find anyone apart from Andrew Lansley and David Cameron who supports the Health and Social Care Bill. Most doctors, nurses and other NHS workers are against it. A Cambridgeshire GP who used to be the vice-chairman of his local CCG and an enthusiastic supporter of the reforms has written in the BMJ that GPs were ‘duped’ and the bill will ‘wreck the NHS’.

Lib Dems are speaking out against it, and even Tory cabinet ministers have said that the bill could make the party unelectable. More than 130,000 people have signed a petition demanding that it be dropped. Roy Lilley at nhsmanagers.net gives seven simple reasons why it should be.

A few days ago the Lancet published an article by Nick Black of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine disputing the government’s main justification for the reorganisation of the NHS: that it has suffered from falling productivity since it was given all that money by Labour 15 years ago. Black argues that this is a myth and, if anything, NHS productivity probably went up in that period.

Another piece in the Lancet warns that the bill as it stands will allow for the end of free healthcare for all in England:

The Government’s continued insistence on its structural changes and its failure to provide an adequate account of why they are necessary confirms concerns that the policy rationale has not been fully disclosed. The Government says that its changes are “vital”. But this is only the case if the object is to create a system that permits alternative funding sources for services currently provided free as part of the NHS.

Most damagingly, risk reports from the four regional strategic health authorities have found that the bill is likely to compromise patient safety: the London SHA identifies a significant risk of ‘preventable harm to children’ and of patients being ‘exposed to unsafe systems/processes which could cause them harm’.

But the Health Bill is by no means the only, or even the biggest, problem facing NHS staff. Funding cuts mean that hospital waiting lists are growing and Primary Care Trusts trying to stay within budget are increasingly restricting access to treatment.

Possibly the ugliest cost-saving measure, however, is the ‘list-cleansing’ exercise recommended by NHS Primary Care Commissioning. In order to eliminate ‘ghost patients’ from practice lists in line with government targets, NHS managers are being advised to write to patients over the age of 90, immigrants and people living in multi-occupancy households. If they do not respond, they will be removed from their GP’s list on the assumption that they are either dead or have moved away. Having fallen off the NHS radar, they will not receive follow-up care or be told about screening or other health initiatives unless they re-register.

Last year a similar scheme wiped 38,000 patients off practice lists in one PCT, leading to widespread outrage among GPs:

The very essence of the NHS is on the line here. If our most vulnerable in society cannot be protected and if we are excluding ethnic minorities by allowing this action to proceed unchallenged then the NHS really is in its terminal phase.

The whole point of these initiatives is not to produce validated lists, but to deregister as many patients as possible.

Meanwhile, doctors may soon go on strike for the first time in 40 years because of the threat to their pensions. The BMA is set to hold an emergency meeting on 25 February to discuss a ballot for industrial action if Lansley continues to refuse to reopen talks. The pension is the main financial incentive for doctors to work within the NHS. Take it away and many of them, already thoroughly demoralised, may well decide to work in the private sector instead. Even if the bill fails to go through, the coalition government may yet oversee the privatisation of healthcare and the end of the NHS.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • UncleShoutingSmut on Goodbye, Circumflex: Unfortunately this post is likely to leave readers with a very partial idea of what is going on. Firstly, there is no "edict": all that has happened i...
    • martyn94 on The Price of Everything: If it's a joke at anyone's expense, it's surely at the expense of any super-rich who take it seriously. I used to skim it occasionally as a diversion ...
    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement