« | Home | »

After the Eviction

Tags: |

On Tuesday morning, just a few hours into the post-eviction era of Occupy Wall Street, Nicholas Kristof of the New York Times tweeted: ‘Could #Bloomberg be a secret Occupy Wall Streeter? He seems to have just revived the movement.’ Official reaction in any form motivates and inspires the protesters. By driving them from Zuccotti Park, the mayor put OWS back into the news cycle, just when major media outlets seemed to be growing bored of the story. The eviction unintentionally pressed a giant ‘reset’ button, solving two intractable problems at once: the growing presence of homeless, mentally ill or unstable people in the park, and the lack of a graceful exit strategy in case the winter weather proved overwhelming.
But the first test was clearly going to be the demonstrations on 17 November. If participation was low, it would be spun as proof that the protests were dying out, aimless and unmoored without the home base of Zuccotti Park. In the event, of course, the turnout was massive, the mood buoyant and determined, the atmosphere electric.

This despite significant police misconduct and worse. Over the course of the day, I witnessed at least a dozen capricious arrests, a few unprovoked acts of violence, and constant intimidation. More than 25 journalists have apparently been arrested. The early morning action in front of the Stock Exchange led to stand-offs, beatings and arrests. Checkpoints sprang up around the financial district, and only people able to produce corporate employee IDs were allowed through to neighbouring streets or subway entrances. Later in the morning, the police cordoned off Zuccotti Park entirely, not letting anyone in or out until they had tracked down and bloodied a guy who had provoked them by kicking barricades. At around 4 p.m., cops blockaded protesters at 14th Street and 5th Avenue.
But then there was the march to Foley Square. The marchers split up to get around the police line at 14th Street. I was with a group of about 1000, walking against the traffic to prevent the cops from catching up with us. Almost every bus, truck or taxi driver honked or hooted support. A quick check on Twitter showed we were one of at least five splinter marches of the same size, and that 10,000 people were already in Foley Square. I’m ashamed to confess my political sentimentality, but the OWS chants – ‘This is what democracy looks like!’ and ‘Whose streets? Our streets!’ – never felt so cathartic.
The coming weeks will show what the eviction from Zuccotti Park will really mean for OWS. Though it hasn’t made for attention-grabbing headlines, there has been steady progress on organisation, infrastructure and planning. The meetings are long, and full of squabbles and all the usual sorts of frustration you get in any meeting. Euphoric skips down Canal Street notwithstanding, the future of OWS will be determined by the level of commitment to the issues, not the level of commitment to the park.
One can grieve for the destruction of the micro-society that the encampment represented, for the loss of the library, for the demolition of the kitchen, for the end of the carnival. A month ago it seemed that a sphere of genuine political possibility was opening up, where before there had been none. Now we appear to be witnessing something even more extraordinary: a previously passive population becoming politicised right in front of our eyes.

Comments on “After the Eviction”

  1. faiz says:

    Dear Annie, thank you for this blog post. I was in the parade myself. I just wished to add, that the New School building at the corner of 14th Street and 5th Avenue was occupied by students about the time that corner was being blocked by police, on the 17th. There seem other buildings of other universities that have also been occupied at present. regards, faiz

  2. bilejones says:

    And once again we are reminded of the central nature of Government: violence.

    We will, no doubt, have a number of “If the Tzar only knewers” decrying that we merely have the wrong people wielding the clubs.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement