« | Home | »

What all the world desires

Tags: |

When you pay with a fiver, a tenner or even a twenty, the chances are the shop assistant barely gives the banknote a glance. But hand over a fifty-pound note, and it’s half a ton to a pony that the recipient will make a show of holding it up to the light to make sure it’s genuine. Most people probably only look for the wire and the watermark. The Bank of England lacks complete confidence in these long-established devices, so it now includes many other security features. Without them, counterfeiting would doubtless be a bigger problem than it is: according to the figures for 2009, only one note in every 50,000 in circulation was a fake; 95 per cent of them were twenties. One-pound coins are much easier to forge: about one in 36 of the 30 to 40 million circulating is reckoned to be counterfeit.

The new £50 note was released on 2 November. Few high street banks have yet seen one, but information highlighting the security features was published in advance. Besides the ‘metal thread’ and the watermarks, the high quality printing, the complex patterning and colour modulation, the unique serial number (with numerals in various sizes and colours) and the microtexts, the notes have raised lettering, and a ‘see-through register’ – coloured shapes on each side that, held up to the light, combine to form a £ symbol. A ‘motion thread’ is woven into the paper, on which holographic representations of the £ symbol and the number 50 not only alternate, but appear to move in space. An ultraviolet lamp turns the five ‘window’ sections of this thread green, and makes an otherwise invisible ‘50’ appear in a bright red and green harlequin pattern, along with a random scattering of bright flecks. According to the Parliamentary Office for Science and Technology, the Bank of England is likely to have also included some covert features, which only key Bank personnel can verify: magnetic or even radioactive inks, or special spectroscopic or isotopic characteristics.

The new, reddish-brown note’s design closely matches that of the £20 note. A similar montage of pattern, ornament and pictorial elements is contained in a rectangular panel, with the watermark pushed into a largely blank side-margin. There’s a similar typographic mishmash too. The denominations on the £5 and £10 notes are in large sanserif figures; the £20 and the new £50 have Roman letter forms.

All four current banknotes use the same royal portrait, and are illustrated with historical figures from the 18th and 19th centuries: Elizabeth Fry (£5), Charles Darwin (£10) and Adam Smith (£20) are now joined by the industrial entrepreneur Matthew Boulton and James Watt, shown with one of Watt’s steam engines and the Soho Factory in Birmingham where they were produced. Boulton and Watt also manufactured a coining mill used by the Royal Mint and many other exchequers. Taken as a group, this selection of pioneering figures is clearly intended to represent social, scientific, philosophical, economic and industrial achievements that, 200 years after their time, still – or so it is hoped – reflect credit on Britain.

The microtexts that a magnifier reveals in the new banknote are limited to plodding repetitions of the initials BOE, the £ symbol, the figure 50 and the words ‘Fifty’ and ‘Pounds’. This dullness (compared with the microtextual surprises in the new UK passport) is partly made up for by the quotations associated with the historical figures in the two newer notes. On the twenty, Adam Smith’s words, superimposed on a scene from the early Industrial Revolution, have the form of a heading or caption, but read as an incomplete sentence waiting for its main verb: ‘The division of labour in pin manufacturing (and the great increase in the quantity of work that results)’.

On the new fifty, Boulton and Watt, provided with what might as well be speech bubbles, seem to be talking to each other about their engine – though the gaze of both is fixed firmly on you, the bearer.

‘I sell here, Sir, what all the world desires to have,’ Boulton says. ‘POWER.’

‘I can think of nothing else,’ Watt replies, ‘but this machine.’

Comments on “What all the world desires”

  1. bilejones says:

    What is the BOE but a counterfeiter?

    Second only to the Fed.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement