« | Home | »

BP returns to the Gulf

Tags: | |

The Obama administration has agreed to let BP resume dipping its beak in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico. The prospect is called Kaskida, situated a few hundred miles off the coast of Louisiana, at a depth of 6034 feet. In the event of another Macondo-style blowout, BP has a contract with the Marine Well Containment Company, a joint nonprofit established by BP’s competitors ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Shell in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. MWCC say they can quickly staunch the flow of oil with a 100-ton capping stack. They say this containment system can handle spills of up to 100,000 barrels per day at a maximum depth of 10,000 feet. 

Why didn’t anyone think to have this system in place before BP’s Deepwater Horizon blew out? Why wasn’t Macondo plugged within the MWCC’s 24-hour response time, instead pouring nearly five million barrels of crude oil into the Gulf for three months? BP’s statement that they will meet or exceed tougher federal requirements for deep-water drilling is like adding airbags to already wrecked automobiles, or removing known terrorists from previously hijacked airplanes, a kind of muffled apology from a backwards-facing bureaucracy.

And what happened to President Obama’s promise, made after meeting BP’s chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg, to ‘hold BP and all other responsible parties accountable’? That meeting ended with a commitment from BP to put $20 billion in escrow to compensate fishermen, shrimpers, restaurateurs and other Gulf residents whose livelihoods suffered because of the spill. Eighteen months later, only $5.3 billion has been paid out. Fewer than half of the 550,567 filed claims have been paid. This doesn’t square with BP’s assurance, trumpeted in full-page newspaper ads and prime-time TV ads while the oil was still flowing, that ‘all legitimate claims will be paid.’

BP’s Kaskida prospect is one of 165 permits issued for deep-water wells since February. The Obama administration ended its post-spill moratorium on deep-water drilling in October 2010. BP will also be allowed to participate in an auction of new deep-water Gulf leases to be held in New Orleans on 14 December, the first such auction since the Macondo spill. Another element of the spill’s aftermath is still playing out. The National Resources Damage Assessment will assign a dollar value to the plants, animals and water marred by the spill, all of which were theoretically held in public trust by the state and federal governments. The process could eventually lead to billions of dollars in additional damages.

Obama’s handing of the BP fiasco recalls his response to the financial crisis. In both cases, the failure of a complex system created a system-wide crisis and public outrage about a lack of sufficient government controls. And in both cases, the president failed to use this leverage. ‘My administration,’ he said in a 2009 White House meeting with top US financiers, ‘is the only thing standing between you and the pitchforks.’ What we got was 15 minutes of Congressional bluster, a few regulatory tweaks and two industries with the same bland faces at the helm and the same blind rapacity in their hearts. Perhaps one day the American public will vote in a president who can wield a pitchfork himself.

Comments on “BP returns to the Gulf”

  1. joncgoodwin says:

    I live in Lafayette, and it’s not on the coast. You should say “246 miles south of Lafayette, Louisiana.”

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement