« | Home | »

BP returns to the Gulf

Tags: | |

The Obama administration has agreed to let BP resume dipping its beak in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico. The prospect is called Kaskida, situated a few hundred miles off the coast of Louisiana, at a depth of 6034 feet. In the event of another Macondo-style blowout, BP has a contract with the Marine Well Containment Company, a joint nonprofit established by BP’s competitors ExxonMobil, Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Shell in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon disaster. MWCC say they can quickly staunch the flow of oil with a 100-ton capping stack. They say this containment system can handle spills of up to 100,000 barrels per day at a maximum depth of 10,000 feet. 

Why didn’t anyone think to have this system in place before BP’s Deepwater Horizon blew out? Why wasn’t Macondo plugged within the MWCC’s 24-hour response time, instead pouring nearly five million barrels of crude oil into the Gulf for three months? BP’s statement that they will meet or exceed tougher federal requirements for deep-water drilling is like adding airbags to already wrecked automobiles, or removing known terrorists from previously hijacked airplanes, a kind of muffled apology from a backwards-facing bureaucracy.

And what happened to President Obama’s promise, made after meeting BP’s chairman, Carl-Henric Svanberg, to ‘hold BP and all other responsible parties accountable’? That meeting ended with a commitment from BP to put $20 billion in escrow to compensate fishermen, shrimpers, restaurateurs and other Gulf residents whose livelihoods suffered because of the spill. Eighteen months later, only $5.3 billion has been paid out. Fewer than half of the 550,567 filed claims have been paid. This doesn’t square with BP’s assurance, trumpeted in full-page newspaper ads and prime-time TV ads while the oil was still flowing, that ‘all legitimate claims will be paid.’

BP’s Kaskida prospect is one of 165 permits issued for deep-water wells since February. The Obama administration ended its post-spill moratorium on deep-water drilling in October 2010. BP will also be allowed to participate in an auction of new deep-water Gulf leases to be held in New Orleans on 14 December, the first such auction since the Macondo spill. Another element of the spill’s aftermath is still playing out. The National Resources Damage Assessment will assign a dollar value to the plants, animals and water marred by the spill, all of which were theoretically held in public trust by the state and federal governments. The process could eventually lead to billions of dollars in additional damages.

Obama’s handing of the BP fiasco recalls his response to the financial crisis. In both cases, the failure of a complex system created a system-wide crisis and public outrage about a lack of sufficient government controls. And in both cases, the president failed to use this leverage. ‘My administration,’ he said in a 2009 White House meeting with top US financiers, ‘is the only thing standing between you and the pitchforks.’ What we got was 15 minutes of Congressional bluster, a few regulatory tweaks and two industries with the same bland faces at the helm and the same blind rapacity in their hearts. Perhaps one day the American public will vote in a president who can wield a pitchfork himself.

Comments on “BP returns to the Gulf”

  1. joncgoodwin says:

    I live in Lafayette, and it’s not on the coast. You should say “246 miles south of Lafayette, Louisiana.”

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement