« | Home | »

Second Rank

Tags:

The government’s fifth columnist at the Guardian, Julian Glover, is to be David Cameron’s new chief speech writer. He has apparently ‘impressed the Downing Street team with his passion for the Coalition over the past year’. (His assessment of Cameron’s conference speech a year ago could have been mistaken for a job application, displaying broad enthusiasm tempered with a few minor criticisms to show how he could improve things.) In the wake of Wednesday’s blustery performance you might think that the prime minister’s office should be looking for someone who wasn’t already such a fan to sharpen the metaphors and hone the soundbites. Indeed, rumour has it that Glover may not have been Downing Street’s first choice, but Glen Newey turned them down.

Comments on “Second Rank”

  1. outofdate says:

    Yes, isn’t he wonderful? The gormless mug alone. The Guardian lists among his most recent entries a piece headlined ‘Cameron’s best hope now is to be dull,’ suggesting they got the the right man after all.

    Then again, does anyone remember John Major? He was prime minister at one time, total disaster, yet he was so boring, as a person if you like, that in cityboy pubs up and down the country as late as May 1997 you’d hear people braying, ‘Safe pair of hands, safe pair of hands.’ You never know…

  2. NM says:

    How interesting. I’m quite surprised, simply because Glover’s Guardian pieces always struck me as so very second-rate, from the recurrent (and slightly odd) food metaphors to the consistently shallow analysis. Isn’t there anyone more capable around? Or have I missed something about Glover’s writings?

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • andymartinink on Reacher v. Parker: Slayground definitely next on my agenda. But to be fair to Lee Child, as per the Forbes analysis, there is clearly a massive collective reader-writer ...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: And in Breakout, Parker, in prison, teams up with a black guy to escape; another white con dislikes it but accepts the necessity; Parker is absolutely...
    • Robert Hanks on Reacher v. Parker: Parker may not have the integrity and honesty of Marlowe, but I'd argue that Richard Stark writes with far more of both than Raymond Chandler does: Ch...
    • Christopher Tayler on Reacher v. Parker: Good to see someone holding up standards. The explanation is that I had thoughts - or words - left over from writing about Lee Child. (For Chandler se...
    • Geoff Roberts on Reacher v. Parker: ..."praised in the London Review of Books" Just read the article on Lee Child in a certain literary review and was surprised to find this rave notice...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement