« | Home | »

In Tbilisi

Tags: |

The moon rises behind the Presidential Palace in Tbilisi

I arrived in Tbilisi in the small hours of the night. (I was on my way to the Tusheti to go trekking, partly in aid of the Roddy Scott Foundation.) The road from the airport passes a blazing, undulating glass building. My taxi driver made me guess what it might be. A skating rink or art gallery, perhaps? But no, it was the new Interior Ministry and Police Headquarters, which, for all the symbolic transparency, has a solid, blocky core.

Next, on a hilltop dominating the Georgian capital, comes the Presidential Palace: a crude White House lookalike topped by a glazed dome borrowed from the modern Reichstag. Even at 4.30 a.m. Mikheil Saakashvili’s official residence shimmers with superabundant power. Then, heading over the river towards the Old Town, an exploding pea pod of twisted glass and metal, kinetically lit, comes into view: the Bridge of Peace. All three, designed and built between 2006 and 2010, are the work of an Italian architect, Michele de Lucchi.

In daylight, Tbilisi is revealed to be in need of urgent (but careful) repair and a reliable water supply. The city mixes unassuming vernacular buildings with substantial stuccoed mansions, embalmed during the Soviet years. Extravagant art nouveau houses, their febrile iron balconies clinging tenuously to crumbling façades, are a reminder that oil money once flooded in from Baku. The so-called Lermontov House in Gudiashvili Square, with its fretwork balconies, has become the emblem of an increasingly desperate rearguard action to save the remnants of the town from the all-consuming alliance of voracious redevelopment and heavy-handed reconstruction.

This has been the best ever year for tourism in Georgia, as peace returns after the 2008 war with Russia. Saakashvili may not like old, but visitors, bringing in their much needed foreign currency, do. How to convince him and his compliant city officials that if the Old Town is razed to make way for global shopping outlets and brash reconstructed streets and squares that would disgrace a Hollywood film lot, they – we – may stop coming?

Comments on “In Tbilisi”

  1. outofdate says:

    You don’t really get countries vying for the 20 dollars a day independent travellers with an interest in architecture and trekking (ugh) grudgingly spend. There are two kinds of tourist worth having, mass and high-end, and obviously there’s not going to be any high-end tourism to Georgia for the next 97 years, so that leaves package tours. Europeans are now mostly allergic to them, but Asians aren’t, and they really do love nothing better than to travel vast distances to identikit shopping malls. That that’s insane is neither here nor there: it’s how they ‘realise’ themselves, so who are we to quibble.

    Plus from the point of view of your high-ranking-Georgian-official-who-asked-to-remain-anonymous, you get twice the kickbacks for tearing something down and then building something else there.

    • Geoff Roberts says:

      I see what you mean. There must be some oil money floating about that could be invested in some careful renovation. Maybe they could revive the ancient craft of flower smuggling – I spent an alcoholic evening in Moscow once with some flower smugglers from Georgia, and they weren’t short of money.

      • outofdate says:

        I love stories like that. Time was the New Yorker would give someone $5,000 and tell them to go away for six months and investigate Georgian flower smugglers, but now it’s all Obama-pop science-Obama-pop science…

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement