« | Home | »

Ed’s Enemies

Tags: |

Ed Miliband’s enemies in the Labour Party are indulging in luxury: a pointless, expensive thing that only people with four years to spend can afford. Up to a point, they resemble John Major’s enemies in the Tory Party – a chorus of Viv Nicholsons who spent, spent, spent down to the penury of 165 surviving MPs in 1997. Those Tories had a reason, if an absurd one. They were hung up on the EU as a conspiracy by the heirs of Hitler to abolish England. The other motive for hating Major was devotion (in the High Church sense) to Margaret Thatcher, Queen and Martyr.

Ed’s enemies have no discernible principle, however misguided. They dream only of David: limp, charming US conformist, token foreign secretary, but the rightful heir to the shining void of Blairism. Childish beyond words, their view is supplemented by the trivialist press. Sketchwriters, too idle to stay for any parliamentary business except the leaders’ set piece, expatiate on voice timbre, assurance quotient, facial appearance and high-profile oneupmanship. The government meanwhile is rolling over in contradictions, policy reversals and ‘clarifications’. The opposition won’t need a ‘stronger’ leader to defeat them at the next election. They might try calm or reticence or even unity – or that bit in the Brer Rabbit books about lying low and saying nothing.

Comments on “Ed’s Enemies”

  1. Phil Edwards says:

    This was a joke, but I think it would actually work – if Miliband dropped off the radar until six months before the next election, then gave a press conference announcing that the Labour party (a) still existed and (b) had policies different from the Coalition, they’d probably get a majority. It would certainly be better than his current strategy, which seems to involve asking himself what Blair would say, thinking of something slightly left-wing and splitting the difference. As for the neo-Blairites (post-Blairites? crypto-Blairites?), a period of silence on their part would be most welcome.

  2. Attrition says:

    Liarbour doesn’t have different policies, it’s the third tory partei of the coalition.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • Graucho on Rise of the Superbugs: Another part of the threat, highlighted in a recent Panorama program, is the excessive use of antibiotics in agriculture. This is an area where the EU...
    • Louis Amis on Trump’s Final Foxwashing: I’m pretty sure the “great writer” who called Trump to “congratulate” him was either Jason Horowitz or David Sanger, both of the New York Ti...
    • frmurphy98 on Labour’s Identity Crisis: Tristram's anguished prescriptions for "what Labour must do" and "what Labour must be" are clearly a moveable feast. But no matter how many nor how ra...
    • Phil Edwards on Labour’s Identity Crisis: Hunt also criticised Corbyn for having "cosmopolitan views", which he counterposed to the good honest English patriotism of the native working class. ...
    • JonathanDawid on Labour’s Identity Crisis: I have no particularly high regard for Tristram Hunt, but it is unfair to say that he is the "son of a baron" as if he were some aristocratic scion. H...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

Advertisement Advertisement