« | Home | »

Nuclear Landscapes

Tags: | |


The modernist mantra that form follows function is best suited to industrial buildings. Even the great cooling towers of coal-fired power stations, visible for miles around like the funnels of land-locked ocean liners, can be celebrated as functional architecture. But the inscrutable form of the nuclear power plant gives nothing away. The events at Fukushima are a terrifying reminder of what those innocuous-looking boxes actually contain.

As a child on holiday in the Quantocks, I remember looking down from the moors towards the Bristol Channel and seeing the incongruous, blocky form of Hinkley Point A in the distance. On the east coast, closer to home, Sizewell was a dour counterpoint to the eccentric holiday village of Thorpeness. In the mid 1980s I attended one day of the interminable Sizewell B public enquiry – it ran for almost three years, taking the record for the longest planning enquiry ever. (One of the other journalists there had just returned from the Philippines, where a new nuclear power plant had been given the go-ahead after a public consultation that lasted three days.) Frank Layfield eventually found in favour of the new Pressurised Water Reactor: Sizewell B was built between 1987 and 1995. The latest generation of nuclear power stations have the letter C – it brings hurricanes to mind.

Buildings the size of nuclear power stations would normally only be easily accommodated within a city, or on its fringes, but for obvious reasons they have to be built as far as possible from populated areas, and beside large bodies of water. So, in Britain at least, that means in isolated places of natural beauty. The first fire at a UK nuclear reactor took place in 1957, at Windscale (later rebranded Sellafield), with a prevailing westerly blowing towards the Lake District.

The first generation of British nuclear power stations has been retired. Dungeness A, Sizewell A and Hinkley Point A are all beached whales: the last stage in the decommissioning process is currently scheduled for 2110. They will not, unlike sound mirrors or the detritus of Second World War defence systems, become weird and wonderful objects in the landscape. At best, they provide a sense of scale, as at Dungeness (see the picture above). Elsewhere, the immense structures provide welcome new habitats. The Bradwell-on-Sea plant, in the flatlands of the Dengie peninsular in Essex, was decommissioned in 2002. Its cliff-like walls are now nesting grounds for peregrine falcons.

Comments on “Nuclear Landscapes”

  1. Chris Larkin says:

    I used to visit Dungeness on a fairly regular basis when I was a child. My father was always drawn to it for the birdwatching opportunities. Being a small boy I was much more taken with the miniature railway and the striped lighthouse. The power station was always a presence but not one that I found weird necessarily. Although monolithic compared to the low lying surroundings its gentle hum was always quite comforting in an odd sort of way. Also Prospect Cottage – the former home of Derek Jarman – is nearby with part of this poem by John Donne painted on the side http://www.bartleby.com/105/3.html. A strange place for metaphysical poetry one might imagine, but it works rather well I think.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.

  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • name on Who is the enemy?: Simply stating it is correct doesn't make it so, I just wish you would apply the same epistemic vigilance to "Muslim crimes" as you do to their Hebrew...
    • Glen Newey on Unwinnable War: The legal issue admits of far less clarity than the simple terms in which you – I imagine quite sincerely – frame them. For the benefit of readers...
    • Geoff Roberts on The New Normal: The causes go back a long way into the colonial past, but the more immediate causes stem from the activities of the US forces in the name of freedom a...
    • sol_adelman on The New Normal: There's also the fact that the French state denied the mass drownings of '61 even happened for forty-odd years. No episode in post-war W European hist...
    • funky gibbon on At Wembley: If England get France in the quarter finals of Euro 16 I expect that a good deal of the fraternity will go out the window

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Edward Said: The Iraq War
    17 April 2003

    ‘This is the most reckless war in modern times. It is all about imperial arrogance unschooled in worldliness, unfettered either by competence or experience, undeterred by history or human complexity, unrepentant in its violence and the cruelty of its technology.’

    David Runciman:
    The Politics of Good Intentions
    8 May 2003

    ‘One of the things that unites all critics of Blair’s war in Iraq, whether from the Left or the Right, is that they are sick of the sound of Blair trumpeting the purity of his purpose, when what matters is the consequences of his actions.’

    Simon Wren-Lewis: The Austerity Con
    19 February 2015

    ‘How did a policy that makes so little sense to economists come to be seen by so many people as inevitable?’

    Hugh Roberts: The Hijackers
    16 July 2015

    ‘American intelligence saw Islamic State coming and was not only relaxed about the prospect but, it appears, positively interested in it.’

Advertisement Advertisement