« | Home | »

Smithwick’s or Guinness?

Tags: |

Large-scale electoral meltdowns are relatively rare. In Italy in 1994 the Christian Democrats went from having been the biggest party in every election since the late 1940s to virtual wipe-out. In Spain in 1982 the Union of the Democratic Centre, which had dominated the first parliament after the transition to democracy, fell from 168 seats to just 12, and effectively ceased to exist. The biggest single defeat for any party was probably that of the Progressive Conservatives in Canada in 1993, who fell from 151 seats to just two, though they later recovered.

By all accounts, Fianna Fáil, the ruling party in Ireland, is facing electoral meltdown on Friday. The party first came to power in 1932, and has governed with an overall majority or as the leading party in a coalition for nearly 60 of the last 80 years. Only twice in that time has their vote fallen below 40 per cent, and then by a hair’s breadth: 39.1 per cent in 1992 and 39.3 per cent in 1997. The party has never lost two elections on the trot, and in 2007, the last election before the collapse of the Celtic Tiger, they won 42 per cent, just 3 per cent less than they had won in 1932. This is an amazing record, but it’s about to end.

The latest polls suggest that Fine Gael, the long-term Laurel to Fianna Fáil’s Hardy, will be the biggest party and may even win an overall majority. This would also be a turn up for the books. The last time Fine Gael (or its predecessor, Cumann na nGaedheal) was the biggest party in the Dáil was following the 1927 election, and they have never recovered that position since being knocked aside by Fianna Fáil. In 1932, they won 35 per cent of the vote; in 2007, they won 27 per cent. Labour, meanwhile, the third party in the system, winning 8 per cent in 1932 and 10 per cent in 2007, now looks like gaining a lot, but not as much as had been hoped for at the beginning of the campaign. Three weeks ago there was much media speculation that Eamon Gilmore, the Labour leader, might become taoiseach. Now, with Fine Gael winning big, it is not even certain that Labour will be part of the coalition.

Most observers of Irish politics, as well as most rational Irish voters, have always puzzled over the real extent of the differences between Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael. They have their origins on opposite sides of the 1922 civil war, but these days both are centre-right parties with a populist touch and privileged access to the Catholic hierarchy, and it’s difficult to distinguish their policies. Their cultures are far apart, however – or used to be. Fine Gael has tended to be favoured by old money, Fianna Fáil by new. Fine Gael was traditionally supported by professionals – doctors, lawyers and anybody else who could put a brass plate outside their offices – while Fianna Fáil has been favoured by the property developers and the men in mohair suits. Fine Gael notables used to go to fee-paying schools, Fianna Fáilers to the Christian Brothers. Fine Gael supporters are more likely to drink Smithwick’s; Fianna Fáilers, Guinness. Fine Gael was the party of Garret FitzGerald – or Garret the Good, as he was known. Fianna Fáil was the party of the late Charles Haughey, or Charlie the Corrupt. Fine Gael has gone into the present election with a pledge to scrap the requirement to take Irish as an exam in the school Leaving Certificate. Fianna Fáil, one of whose stated aims is to restore Irish as the vernacular, disagrees.

Fine Gael’s great strength has always been that it was not Fianna Fáil, and that it was better at not being Fianna Fáil than any other party. Now that Fianna Fáil, in coalition with the Greens, has led Ireland into economic disaster, this is a great advantage. If Fianna Fáil goes into electoral meltdown on Friday, however, and if it then disappears from the Irish political landscape, there will be nothing left against which Fine Gael can define itself. Unless, that is, it can take advantage of the newly created gap on the Irish electoral market and become Fianna Fáil.

Comments on “Smithwick’s or Guinness?”

  1. criticalbill says:

    Meet the new boss, same as the old boss

  2. Niall Anderson says:

    I’m not sure the FF wipeout will be as comprehensive as some are predicting. The sheer fact that there’s barely a cigarette paper between the policies of the two main parties means that there are a lot of floating voters, and most hereditary Fianna Fáilers will end up voting for the tribe (with however heavy a heart).

    There’s also the fact that while the parliamentary party is disgraced (and not before time), Fianna Fáil remains a national organisation with a strong local base. There are many constituencies where Fine Gael will never win, and where there isn’t a viable Labour or independent candidate I’d expect FF to hold almost all of them. The sheer social reach of Fianna Fáil is likely to mean that any wipeout will be temporary.

    I doubt Fine Gael will get in with a clear majority, but the scenario is depressing whatever FG’s eventual performance and whoever joins them in government. FG’s policy with regard to the ECB/IMF bailout is only slightly less craven than Fianna Fáil’s, and the country is more or less inflexibly committed to a certain financial policy till 2014 (and beyond, presuming the state doesn’t default). And while one crisis has informed another, it’s a shame that the financial crisis is likely to take away from the more deep-rooted problem: Irish political culture in general, with its cronyism and hereditary blackguardism, the cosy rewards for the already well-rewarded, its financial and legislative casuistry, its real and metaphorical bankruptcy.

    From that standpoint, perhaps the best thing that could happen is a Fianna Fáil wipeout. The new government might not be any better, but a wipeout would signal a change in the culture and make room for something new.

  3. donalod says:

    The best description I’ve heard of the difference between FF and FG is that FF tends to the Italian model and FG to the German of European Christian Democrat parties.
    Class difference between FG and FF was always narrow, and never fixed. Early FG and CnG leaders like WT Cosgrave and John A Costello were Christian Brothers educated while Dev was a creature of the ubber posh Holy Ghost Fathers’ schools.
    Many of our now outgoing FF cabinet including Brians Cowan and Lenihan are products the most expensive private schools in the country.
    It is probably true that historically FG tended to get the backing of people who worked for themselves, whereas FF support tended to come from employees and managers in large scale enterprises, though you couldn’t swear by that.
    The Irish class system can be tricky to figure out but as a rule of thumb the difference is not between people who drink Guiness or Smithwicks it is (or was) between men who drink beer and men who take a drop of whiskey.

  4. pscully@redact.ie says:

    It is quite lovely to see the old stereotypes persisting. Yes indeed, Irish politics really does all revolve around what beer you drink. Could Peter Mair not have thrown in a few few auld leprechauns and begorrahs to liven things up a bit? We really are such charming people though, even if we’re a bit fond of the drop. As my teenage friends would say: PLEEEAASE.

    On a more serious note, Peter Mair is wrong about the beer. As everybody in Drumcondra knows, Bertie Ahern’s favourite tipple was/is Bass.

Comment on this post

Log in or register to post a comment.


  • Recent Posts

    RSS – posts

  • Contributors

  • Recent Comments

    • mideastzebra on Swedish-Israeli Tensions: Avigdor Liberman was not foreign minister November 2015.
    • lars hakanson on Exit Cameron: Europe will for good reason rejoice when the UK elects to leave. The country has over the years provided nothing but obstacles to European integration...
    • Michael Schuller on Immigration Scandals: The Home Office is keen to be seen to be acting tough on immigration, although I'm not sure that the wider project has anything to do with real number...
    • Geoff Roberts on What happened in Cologne?: The most surprising thing about the events in Cologne (and the most disturbing) is that some 600 incidents of theft, harrasment and rape were reported...
    • EmilyEmily on What happened in Cologne?: The author's argument is straightforward: Sexual violence is one beast; fears about migrants is another - let's not confuse the two. Alfalfa's poin...

    RSS – comments

  • Contact

  • Blog Archive

  • From the LRB Archive

    Chris Lehmann: The Candidates
    18 June 2015

    ‘Every one of the Republican candidates can be described as a full-blown adult failure. These are people who, in most cases, have been granted virtually every imaginable advantage on the road to success, and managed nevertheless to foul things up along the way.’

    Hugh Pennington:
    The Problem with Biodiversity
    10 May 2007

    ‘As a medical microbiologist, for example, I have spent my career fighting biodiversity: my ultimate aim has been to cause the extinction of harmful microbes, an objective shared by veterinary and plant pathologists. But despite more than a hundred years of concentrated effort, supported by solid science, smallpox has been the only success.’

    Jeremy Harding: At the Mexican Border
    20 October 2011

    ‘The battle against illegal migration is a domestic version of America’s interventions overseas, with many of the same trappings: big manpower commitments, militarisation, pursuit, detection, rendition, loss of life. The Mexican border was already the focus of attention before 9/11; it is now a fixation that shows no signs of abating.’

    James Meek: When the Floods Came
    31 July 2008

    ‘Last July, a few days after the floods arrived, with 350,000 people still cut off from the first necessity of life, Severn Trent held its annual general meeting. It announced profits of £325 million, and confirmed a dividend for shareholders of £143 million. Not long afterwards the company, with the consent of the water regulator Ofwat, announced that it wouldn’t be compensating customers: all would be charged as if they had had running water, even when they hadn’t.’

Advertisement Advertisement